Fighting spearthrowers with firearms isn't a big accomplishment. Spain and Portugal couldn't conquer North Africa.
>>16882127The French, Italians, and British, though...
Give me a single good reason to conquer North Africa(not counting Egypt)Also the colonization of Africa wasn't a fight against spearthrowers, it was a fight against mosquitoes.
>Fighting spearthrowers with firearms isn't a big accomplishmentIberians couldn't even do that. They only "beat" Aztecs who ran in terror at the sight of horses. When they fought actual warriors they lost and had to beg them for peace.
>>16883157I wonder which first language and which haplogroup the descendent of these people have
>>16883157lol chichimecs were good but they still lost, most people in the bajio region descend from tlaxcaltecs and not chichimecs on their indian side
>>16882127Portugal has a pretty good track record with naval warfare going up against all the sultans and naval empires in the East, including other Europeans, Ottomans and the Ming. These were far from spear chuckers, and Spain had one of the most effective land armies in Europe for a while.
>>16883215>replying seriously to a shitty bait
>>16883196>>16883207They could only "win" the same way Pakis are winning in Britain now
>>16883157They completely subjugated the Aztec midgets.Chichimeca terrorized the proto-Mexica people for centuries. We have the data on Chichimeca samples, they were close to North East Amerinds and so completely dominated the jungle-adapted squat goblinos that the Spanish enslaved and raped and used to form the basal component of modern day Latwinx.
>>16883229Not really because they were severely outnumbered.
>>16883103OP confirmed for peak brainletism
