[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1709686291151675.png (304 KB, 602x379)
304 KB
304 KB PNG
Who accomplished more / was the Greater figure?
Who would have accomplished more had neither met an unfortunate death that was largely beyond their control (illness vs treachery)?
>>
>>16889767
>Who accomplished more / was the Greater figure?
caesar/alex
>>
>>16889767
politically and militarily speaking, caesar

culturally and legacy speaking, alexander
>>
Caesar broke down and cried over the fact Alexander was better than him.
>>
>>16890824
Caesar was like 30 at the time. He had spent the previous time climbing the hierarchy of Rome; he wasn't born a prince like Alexander.
>>
>>16889767
Alexander, if for nothing else than how widespread and far his reach was.
Caesar is the Alexander of Europe
Alexander is known from Europe to Japan
>>
>>16889767
Caesar because his legacy actually succeeded. Augustus his chosen heir actually got to rule Rome, and so did his family and their adopted heirs for a few centuries. He also wasn't born a Prince, didn't have a father that militarized his state for him. While he died because of retarded decisions like Alex, his name survived far longer, and was respected as a title of rulership for centuries until this day while Alexander has no similar legacy except his generals and friends murdering his children and cutting up his empire to forget about him. Arguably Ptolmey could be considered more accomplished than Alexander.
>>
>>16890824
Alexander became king at 20 years old giving him a 21 year head start to Caesar's closest equivalent in his first consulship(or a further year for proconsular) and as the other anon said had a lot of the footwork all ready to go for him(not that it should be a knock against him in general, though Phillip really doesn't get enough credit. On the flipside Alexander did all that in a brief 12 years which is where most of his credit truly belongs, however the biggest bulk of Caesar's accomplishments are in the last 14-15 years of his life. It's an interesting to make with Caesar having the extra time but Alexander the circumstance. Either way both would probably be tickled their given names show them first in a google search.
>>
As a pious non-European Catholic, these are my worst mortal enemies.
>>
>>16889767
Alexander accomplished more, and would have accomplished more still had he lived longer. He had an immense head start though. While far more mercurial, I feel like Alexander was the greater of the two. Both messed up their succession in my opinion, although both died quite suddenly.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.