why is the book of eunuch not considered biblical canon?
>>16891294Because there is no 'book of eunuch'.
The Bible was put together by people inspired by the holy Spirit. They already decided what to put in it and what not and the holy Spirit can't be wrong. Read a little if one of those lost books and it was some weird shit that somewhat contradicted books in the Bible.
>>16891294because phone posters weren't around yet.
>>16891294Jesus referred directly to the material in Enoch during his preaching. Much of his behavior and positions can not be explained unless he knew it was true. Some anon smarter than me did a write up of it once here with specific references to what verser where.
>>16891332I’m interested to know more if you can.
>>16891294it's a weird fanfic written like 200 years after the parts of the bible it's about (genesis)it was influential around the time jesus lived which is why its referenced in the nt and part of the ethiopian biblesome other jewish fanfics did make the catholic bible but not the jewish bible like the book of tobit
>>16891362But the book of Enoch in its bulk was originally written in antediluvian times (same as Job). It was written before the events of Genesis 6 ended
>>16891415source: trust me dog
I'm more curious that the Shepard of Hermes did not remain Canon for most Churches.>>168913151st Enoch doesn't contradict the Bible though.>>16891362Isn't the 1st Enoch was actually written before Daniel thought?
>>16891294>thou shalt not have balls