Why weren’t Arabs able to create art like Persians and Turks?
Early Seljuk statue from 1038 AD
>>17091067Palestinians are great artists, you are just thinking of the criminal clique which constitutes modern Jews.
>>17091021Islamic iconoclasm
The only decent scans of Palestinian art that I have so far, more contributions would be greatly appreciated, I want to catalog their art before they get exterminated and their culture and history digitally is scrubbed from the internet by Jewish AI.
>>17091067Not to do whataboutism but the same can be said about Germanics. Seljuk despite being nomadic peoples were able art in less 50 years of being settled while it took Germanics around until 1000+ years to do it
>>17091147>The only decent scans of Palestinian art that I have so far, more contributions would be greatly appreciated, I want to catalog their art before they get exterminated and their culture and history digitally is scrubbed from the internet by Jewish AI.Thanks for preserving the history. Someone should make a Reddit thread with the same blurb if it doesn't exist already.
>>17091276* and Reddit sub.
>>17091093>>17091099>>17091106>>17091112>>17091116>>17091121>>17091130>>17091136>>17091141>>17091147I'm pro-Palestine but this is slop, people need to stop pretending artists are good just because they agree with them lol
>>17091021Semites suffer from low iq, inbreeding etc
>>17091021>turksTurkic people are nomadic, they don’t have that type of art, if you’re talking about art done by people in the ottoman era they’re just locals who speak Turkish, I’m guessing that most of this good looking Persian art came in 1500s, at that same time the Arabs didn’t have a cultural power house and were under the ottomans, before that Arab and Persian art wasn’t much different
>>17091743cope see >>17091028sythicans also had art and were nomadic nomadic people can produce many things
Ben Garrison absolutely mogs all of them.
>>17091021why does that muslim art always look chinkish
>>17091276Jews flood every space that has powerful and meaningful representational art with meaningless abstract culture-jamming. I try to collect notable Palestinian pieces while cataloging for the Aryan Art threads on /pol/ but I can only do so much.
>>17091028This isn't exactly high quality art
>>17091743>good looking Persian art came in 1500syup
>>17092102It depicted Turkic ruling class. Seljuks, Ilkhanids, golden hordes and early Ottomans look like >>17091021 But overtime native admixture become more dominant and they started to look like >>17092724
>>17091093>>17091099>>17091106>>17091112Those are some pretty mid paintings. I didn't even bother to see the rest of the stuff you posted.It's also from just one artist. This doesn't tell anything about their people's artistic tradition (especially considering that this paintings are pretty westernized in style).
>>17091119Iconoclasts can still make "icon-less" art, like abstract geometric art. And even in this kind of art the Persians brutally mogged the Arabs.
>>17092102Because it is.
>>17092750Df? Are we suppose to assume that every 1 in 10 combatants were having their heads cleanly sliced off on the battlefield, aside from all having the same hair and moustache styles.
>>17092102>>17091021The Arabs did have illustrations and were original in its' conception, unlike the Persian imitation of Chinese art brought on especially by the Mongol Ilkhanids. The Arabs create, the Persians imitate.
>>17091021Groan... not again
>>17091021You're not very smart, are you?
>>17091021>>17091028You're.. not very smart... are you?
>>17091021Yeah sure those Arabs were so primit-*gulp, I take that back!
>>17091743>if you’re talking about art done by people in the ottoman era they’re just locals who speak TurkishThe Turks didn't just brainwash the locals, they mixed with them too
>>17091021Yeah bro, those fucking cavemen!
>>17091021Sure... they were such cavemen...
>>17091021Such hateful despicable creature, those Arabs...........right?
>>17092779Ilkhanids and golden hordes are mongols
>>17094581>>17094587>>17094593those aren’t arabs you fuctard
>>17094766yeah they're nordic.weird how nordics did everything except europe
>>17094777> The Sabaean language and similar languages used in some of the rival kingdoms were, like Arabic, Semitic languages. But they were not Arabs, differing in distinctive ways, according to Christian Robin, Director of Ancient Semitic Studies at France’s National Center for Scientific Research in Paris. Though the Sabaeans and others in the region are referred to today as South Arabians in the geographical sense, Robin says they cannot be considered, nor did they consider themselves to be, Arabs, as this implies that they spoke Arabic, which they did not.neck yourself retard. also wasted digits
>>17094794So Yemenis are not Arabs?
>>17094794That fresco is Nabatean, clown
>>17094810Ancient Yemenis weren't. They were South Arabians, who are just another branch of semites, more closely related to Ethiopian semites than to Arabs. Modern Yemenis are arab mutts however, but that art is ancient.There's a distinction between "Arab" (an ethnic group speaker of the Arabic language) and "Arabian" (the ones who inhabit the Arabian Peninsula, regardless of ethnicity). For example: Modern Egyptians are Arabs, but not Arabians; Saudis are Arabian Arabs; Ancient Yemenis are Arabians, but not Arabs.
>>17094810ancient yemenis in fact hated arabs and genocided them
>>17095055>more closely related to ethiopniansno south arabians are still more related to northern semites even linguistically but they’re not exactly arabs that’s true
>>17095081Both South Arabian and Ethiopian Semitic are part of the Southern Semitic branch. So at least linguistically they are closely related. Genetically they are indeed closer to Arabs though.
>>17095055>Ancient Yemenis weren'tSo what happened that made the new Yemenis?>Modern Yemenis are arab muttsWhen did that happen? What about the Yemeni tribes that moved to Oman, hijaz, nejd, Syria and Iraq before Islam?>Modern Egyptians are ArabsAt least half aren’t>Ancient Yemenis are Arabians, but not Arabs.This sounds extremely retarded
>>17094605>>17094587You're posting pre-islamic or shia shit.
>>17095430So? Fatimd Arabs are still Arab. Pre-Islamic Arabs are still Arab.
>>17095519The vast majority of Arabs are sunnis who hate art. You coping with shia and pre islamic shit doesn't change that
>>17095386>So what happened that made the new Yemenis?Migration>When did that happen?Some time between the last 1400 years>At least half aren't You get my point >This sounds extremely retardedIt does, but it's true. I don't make the rules.
>>17091021They did develop forms of art that were geometrical and calligraphic
>>17095127no linguistically sabaean is more similar to aramaic than ethiopic
>>17096145despite ethiopic coming from it
>>17096145If you say so... It's not what every linguist working on the field says about it.
>>17096303not up my ass, i remember reading something about don’t know what it was https://www.jstor.org/stable/43782852maybe it was related to this i haven’t checked just sabaean tho not all south arabian languages
>>17091021Look up Abbasid and Umayyad artThey used to have better art then contemporary Franks
