>what if we banned all political parties except for ONE>and what if this one political party controlled every aspect of government, and what if this government controlled all aspects of the economy>And what if the head of this political party was the dictator of the whole operations with no term limits or separations of powers or breaks on his power>Oh, and theres zero input from the people at large as to who this dictator is going to be, its basically just back room dealings by the oligarchy of the party elites>But we have some sort of elections for local offices for the people>they get once choice of a candidate that the all powerful party selects for them>this is "real democracy" How the fuck do people still defend this shit?
>>17270465But enough about Nazism
>>17270468
>>17270465Jews are god tier masters at scamming vulnerable people and communism was one of the biggest
>>17270465>>this is "real democracy"judge not by selection of the officers but by the outcomescommunist states, for all their flaws, had significantly flatter wealth distributions than the west, which suggests far greater levels of democratic control over the economy.I still don't like the party-state idea though, and especially don't like institutionalizing it after the revolution/civil war ends. I think it ultimately led to 1989.
>>17270508Cont. Communism is no different to other snake oil scams, like 3rdoid scam callers guilt tripping and gaslighting old people to give them their life savings or 99$ alternative medicine BS like Colloidal Silver and Kale smoothies, its just enacted on a grander scale. Give people an ideal utopian future that is impossible to realise realistically any time soon, instead of a more practical but racist and conservative path to utopia which is uncomfortable, and they lap it up and change the power structure of society so all the decisionmaking and asset control goes to you. Stupid goys are so gullible, teehee! Average South Shitalian / Jüden machiavellian mindset.
>>17270512Why is a flatter wealth distribution more "democratic"? If most people want income inequality (i.e. because they realize being well-off and unequal is better than everyone being poor), or even just policies which lead to inequality (e.g. freedom to open a business, strong protections for private property, and few regulations) then is that society less democratic than a dictatorship which imposes equality as a consequence of its oppression? Also, how is control of the economy by one political party in anyway more democratic than control of the economy by elected officials, a semi-politically-accountable central bank, and whoever happens to have money? Even if Fortune 500 companies were the only entities in the US that have leverage over the economy that's still a power 500 times more dispersed than control by an unelected central committee.
>>17270512The party elites had more of a monopoly on power than any political faction in the west specifically because they used the state to outlaw any rival parties. Communist wield the state like a kid who found his dads gun. Their sense of democracy is basically just a strong sense of righteous indignation where they get to define whats "fair" and carry it out.
>>17270512Communist state all eventually liberalise to avoid collapse, so you end up in the same place
>>17270512>significantly flatter wealth distributions than the westEveryone being equally on the verge of subsistence is not the win you think it is.
>>17270465Idk, ask americans who handled all three rulling branches to one man
>>17271419Americans elected all of those members in an election with other parties though. A party losing in an open election is not at all comparable to one political party using the state to ban all other rival parties and then having a cable of insider party elites make all the decisions you stupid animal.
>democracy copedemocracy leads to one party control. True democracy is a tyranny of the majority. Marxism-Leninism employs a one party dictatorship of the working majority.
>>17271429we all know American democracies are so free and fair... didn't the asshole who got voted in say that he was cheated out of a win last election?>>17272503It's funnier when you realize all the real examples of Socialism we have are basically the First French Republic and fucking Haiti; Socialism hasn't had its America yet, and hell, in a sense it hasn't even had its Bastille nor its James to the Western World. The best analogy for America with its successful display of what a post-Feudal/Capitalist nation can do is currently China, being a great display of what a post-Capitalist/Socialist nation can do.Cope all you want, but all our cheap and expensive shit is now made by China, designed by Chinese engineers who are making the inflow of new Chinese liveleak videos plummet. Meanwhile America is still currently stuck on... trannies, or something.
>>17272588We have multiple tech companies that are worth more than entire countries.
>>17270465>>what if we banned all political parties except for ONE>>and what if this one political party controlled every aspect of government, and what if this government controlled all aspects of the economy>>And what if the head of this political party was the dictator of the whole operations with no term limits or separations of powers or breaks on his power>>Oh, and theres zero input from the people at large as to who this dictator is going to be, its basically just back room dealings by the oligarchy of the party elitesIgnoring the image and everything below that: and?
>>17270465This is literally El Salvador and everyone praises it.
>>17272811your country is ruled by indian h1b saars on crack, and homosexual hapa ideologues who would laugh their assess off if they seen you starving on the street because you got laid off.americans need to stop bragging about how beautiful the boots that stomp them and get shoved up their ass are.
>>17270465In capitalism, the proletariat chooses which colour of capitalist will oppress him. This is not true democracy because the few exploit the many; a democracy for the rich but not the poor. Communism is true democracy because it brings power back to the many, that being the power to end capitalist exploitation in which the few exploit the many.Because the capitalist will seek to regain his power to exploit the many, this requires a ruthless attitude toward that class - the oppressor class - which takes the form of outlawing any party that wishes to return to the old, unequal, exploitative system. You have been brainwashed by bourgeois propaganda.
>>17272852NOOOO YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU'RE JUST AN UNFREE UNMANLY SLAVE LIKE ME- I MEAN LIKE, UH, UH, YOU... UH... NO WORK, NO BURGER OR IPHONE IN VUVUZEALA!!
>>17270469Pol-ack seethe forever
>>17272842>ummm that doesn't counthaha ok. silicon valley is worth more than your entire country btw
>>17272944Oh no, that DOES count. It counts 100%. What does it say about your nation?
>>17272976That we're the wealthiest nation on earth responsible for the best tech.
>>17273002Missing the forest for the trees
>>17273017>i-its just bad ok?whatever device you're using to post here has american tech in it whether you like it or not
>>17273019Sure, but now your ability to get pussy is determined if the Tindr algorithm is feeling particularly generous to your poorfaggot ass.Shall we go on? Replying will only let more people see this, btw.
>>17272836No, it isnt at all.
>>17272829>Ignoring the image and everything below that: and?
>>17272588>we all know American democracies are so free and fairYeah they are. Saying the statement back, but in a sassy tone isnt an argument.
>>17273117
>>17273095>you're not allowed to have sex unless tindr says soIs this what third worlders think america is like? What the fuck?
>>17273113I'm still waiting for your point.
>>17270465You just mostly described LDP as a party and Trudeau as an leader
>>17270465HOLY SHIT ITS LITERALLY AMERICA
>hehe achuawy people were freer under the communismYou faggots are lucky you’re allowed to breathe
>>17273216You didnt make any points to refute bootlicker. You just said how much you enjoy licking your masters boots like a good cuck
>>17273307>You didnt [sic.] make any points to refuteAsking "and?" was the point. Can you provide an answer or not?
