What to do with the growing afrocentrism and blatant misinformation on social media?
>>17272418Remember when Egypt sued Netflix over Cleopatra? Maybe cucked out Scandis should do the same.
It was actually Finns.
>>17272423Yes. N1a-L550>Y4341>Y4339 identified in sample ful001, 314 AD, Fullerö, Sweden.A richly furnished inhumation male chamber burial, placed in a mound. Although the grave had been robbed, it was still remarkably richly furnished and unique. The burial chamber is the largest of all known in northern Sweden from CE 200–700. The gold finger rings, one of them the largest gold finger ring ever found in Sweden, were probably military honours; the chain mail, belt and the boar-like tusks, and canines from pigs, probably for a horse fitting, may indicate that the man had been in Roman service. In the grave was a worn gold coin used as a pendant, struck for the Roman emperor Maximian Hercules 291CE. Bear skin was placed with the deceased.
>>17272418Just laugh at them for being retarded. Mockery is the best antidote for asinine opinions.
>>17272418I like it because it gives you a taste of your own remedy since you love to we wuz as Greeks/Romans and other ancient people as well.
>>17272434It's not "wewuzzing" if you actually are European, Gomez.
>>17272434It is historically accurate to say that Greeks and Romans were white, Egyptians too. Modern demographics ≠ ancient demographics in the transition zones between the native ranges of different races.
>>17272438
>>17272418Why do you care exactly? Why go on twitter or Facebook and post cropshots on 4chan?
>>17272418Niggers wuz first you can't deny it. They wuz the Ancient Egyptians who enslaved the Black Hebrews and they wuz the Black Jews & Black Arabs/Moors who enslaved Black Africans. Riddle me that Negro.
>>17272440>It is historically accurate to say that Greeks and Romans were white, Egyptians too."White" didn't exist back then in the modern sense.>Modern demographics ≠ ancient demographicsThere's a pretty huge continuity
>>17272421That suit went nowhere.
>>17272441isn't the ugly person supposed to be on the left, not the right?
vikings were just conscripted minions working in favor of venetian interests and venticians were black, the mentioned dynamic therefor presets itself
>>17272418Maybe black Vikings ruling Scandinavia might be a bit of an exaggeration, but there were plenty of powerful black nobles in Muslim Sicily and Iberia as shown by DNA analysis, and a half black girl has been found in Early Medieval England too
>>17272458*therefor presents itselfthe pirates life is the life for me
>>17272434>black wewuzzing is okay because nordcucks do it too
>>17272453>"White" didn't exist back then in the modern sense.Semantic garbage. They knew they were white and used white to describe themselves even though they had other descriptors like Athenian, Aryan or European which were more descriptive.
>>17272472fake news
>>17272418This is probably a bait account and if you look at the reactions, mostly everyone's laughing at it with their wignat friends on that likely mostly white userpage. Imagine being so obsessed you think about Black people even when you're alone with your caucasian friends.
https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/A-PH4980/treeSomeone got blacked in ancient Scandinavia. They're not entirely wrong.
>>17272434>>17272441lmao no we dont. Literally no one is saying they were scandinavian. lmao what are you on?
>>17272418>>17272421>>17272431>>17272450>>17272459>>17272482Africa will be relevant again in the 2040s-2050s, maybe 2060s. What's being done now is that, we're going through the social engineering phase for that period by our “elites”. That's what happening. Also, substitute “black” with “ancient Egyptian pharaohs” and it starts to make more sense, doesn't it...
>>17272434>mexican pretending to be roman>youre stealing my culture ese!
>>17272418Nordicism on twitter is objectively worse, and more widespread.
>>17272966define 'nordicism'
>>17272969something that i don't like
