>>17273801Except that Taforalt isn't mulatto, it had unknown "sub saharan" admixture (30%) that doesn't match any archaic or modern sub saharan dna population, but it showed some proximity to some sub saharan african populations with R1b of Lake Chad, so they assumed that it is ssa. It was more eurasian than ssa (even if their assumptions are right) but another study suggested that this unknown ssa admixture might be just another archaic north african population and that the gene flow might be in the opposite direction. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/423079v1.full>>17274032Basal eurasians weren't a real population. What is real is that Caucasoids are descendant from Aterians, the original SSA population which you confuse with the Negroids who are a later modern offshoot, who later mixed with Australoids. Australoids are actual basal eurasians who likely mixed Asian homo erectus and left African much earlier than Aterians. Mota seems to belong to extinct proto-Bantu expasion African subrace that was ancestral to Australoids (who seem to be most basal eurasians other than actual basal eurasians) and maybe all Eurasians. Basal eurasians predated the split of eastern eurasians and western eurasians, when Eurasians migrated out of africa, they passed through the arabian peninsula and/or iranian gulf, in that place some group of people separated and became basal eurasians, the main group remained together, fucked with Neanderthals of Zagros Mountains and separated arround the caucasus/india/nepal, the ones that moved through caucasus and anatolia into europe and siberia became Western eurasians, the pnea that plunged into india southwards onto southeast asia and so became East eurasians.https://anthrogenica.com/archive/index.php/t-6165.htmlhttps://anthrogenica.com/archive/index.php/t-12080.htmlThe truth is that Basal Eurasian are a statistical concept. It exists to explain the reduced Neanderthal ancestry in ancient and modern West Eurasians.
>>17274376You again...I hate the fight between you and that useless italian
So to speak. East and west eurasians (pure) should be more related to each other than either is to basals. But modern west eurasians are the result of a West eurasian + basal admixture, older and purer ones such as Gravettians, kostenki14, sunghir, ANE, WHG, aurignacians, etc lacked this "basal" component as evidenced by Zagrosian neanderthal DNA and other signatures. Dzudzuana was mutted probably.>Aterians, the original SSA population which you confuse with the Negroids who are a later modern offshootWest africans, who diverged from east africans AFTER eurasians left, mixed with the mutts of west african pygmies (that had diverged 100k years into the past) and basal west africans (that had diverged 300k years into the past), the last of whom had mixed with another human species (not erectus because they didn't exist in africa anymore), which caused WEST africans to have around 7% 18% tops of ghost DNA.
>>17274376spaniards calling Italians "brown" or "browner" is idiotic.Subsaharians are literally black hominids monkeys.Even taking south italians, what do south italian have?Natufian which is a component of ANF?Excess CHG that is a component of Steppe?Excess Iran N which is similar to CHG?I'm sorry but once they found out Greeks were basically swarthoids this "westernist g25 nordicism" is just ridicolous.Swarthy Greeks were the peak of civilization while Scandinavians were... Idk what they were doing.Are estonians more historically relevant than spaniards because they are light skinned? They have no natufian doe masterrace masterrace!
>>17274380I accept your defeat.
>>17274386>I'm sorry but once they found out Greeks were basically swarthoids this "westernist g25 nordicism" is just ridicolous. Swarthy Greeks were the peak of civilization while Scandinavians were... IdkThe Mediterranean was superior because of the MENA influence. >Yamnaya Culture (origin of Indo Europeans) was a mix between European-Middle Eastern people>European cultures between 7000 to 1500 B.C were done By Levantine Neolitic Farmers>Middle Eastern Civilizations (Mesopotamia, Egypt and Anatolia) invented for the Mediterranean: Writing system, Alphabet, Numbers, Mathematic, Medicine, Agriculture, Geometry, Laws, City-states, Empires, Currency, Centralized Government, Astronomy, Sociology, Wheel, Calendar system, Organized religions, Division Labor Universities, Glass, Copper,...>Early Greek Civilizations (Like Minoan/Pelasgian) were done by people of Levantine and Anatolian origins, later Greek civilizations were influenced by the Middle Eastern one>The word Europe came from «Europa», a Phoenician Princess and a lot of European Gods have Pelasgian/Middle Eastern origin or were influenced by MENA mythologies (Aphrodite comes from Astarte, Apollo comes from Aplu Enlil/Nergal, Hercules comes from Ninurta,...)>The world dominant religions (Islam, Christianity, and Judaism) are Middle Eastern>Roman and Byzantine Empires had more emperors from MENA than any non-southern European region: Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Marrinus, Elegabalus, Severus Alexander, Philip the Arab, Aemilianus, Gordian 1. Gordian II, Marenties Isaurian (Syrian) dynasty, Mhephurlan dynasty, the Amorian dynasty, Leontios (Twenty Years Anarchy),...Even the delicious European PAWGs come from MENA as the origin story of the Venus Callipyge cult implies (she is Sicilian). All the Nords' resentment against the Meds in this forum is because they founded the first nation-states/empires of Europe (Portugal/Spain, France, Italy,...) while Germany only became a real country in fucking 1871.
