all the grobgerman fags always insist that germany had all these incredible military minds, always innovating.okay germboos.>exactly who>exactly what did they invent/innovateyou are now realising all the greta military inventions in history are in fact British, or sometimes French, which means inspired by British. Britain, or England, has had consistently the strongest land army in history since around the 11th century.
>>17274502Maurits of NassauWallensteinGrosse Kurfurst & Friedrich der GrosseScharnhorst & GneisenauLudendorffGuderian, Model, DoenitzMeanwhile the British have...Uhhh...
>>17274515The british have the guy shrapnel was named after
>>17274515>bunch of random names>doesn't say what a single one of them didthis is what always happens. naming random germans, pretending they invented stuff.>meanwhile the british have>uhhhhhPioneered just about every modern naval strategy there is. Mastered trench warfare. Radar. Sonar. Percussion caps. Torpedos. Longbows.We have been fighting armies bigger than us and winning for a thousand years because we actually invent stuff instead of pretending to kek
>>17274515Moltke, Manstein, Clausewitz.Don't forget all the best tank and plane aces were Germans.The greatest guerrilla warfare warrior was Lettow Vorbeck
>>17274524>best tank and plane acesSo you get some fancy boys doing tricks then you lose the war anyway.>best guerrilla warfarethis one I concede is not a british thing because we fight in the open, but this obviously goes to french resistance
>>17274522Scharnhorst was a military commander that reformed drills and practices iirc during the 18th and 19th century, serving Prussia
>>17274536>uhh...uhhh..he said soldiers should...le train!true german brilliance
>>17274522Maurits pioneered combined arms warfare, modern logistics & drillWallenstein did economics of warfareFriedrich & his father drills, training and total warScharnhorst & Gneisenau did the reserve system and AuftragstaktikMoltke for the timetablesLudendorff for KesselschlachtGuderian for Modern combined arms, communication, exploitationModel for defense in depthDoenitz for commerce raidingand of course Clausewitz for theory of warTrench warfareRohr for stormtroopers>mastered trench warfareThey could only block the stalemate through american bodies and were not better at trench warfare than anyone else, noticeable worse than germans desu. No storm troopers, no deep shelters, retarded assault tactics>radarliterally based on research by Herz & Huelsmeyer, developed independently by Germany, Japan & the soviet union>sonarCanadian, French, Russian & German>torpedosLiterally invented by a Dutchman, Cornelis Drebbel>percussion gapFrench discovered it concurrently>longbowsIrrelevant mostly used in your backwater>be british>get conquered by saxons>get conquered by danes>get conquered by normans>get conquered by hollanders
>>17274573>UHH ACTUALLY THEY ALL INVENTED TRAINING AND UH CLOCKS>AND>UHHH>YOU'RE A BACKWATER, OKAY?Britain hasn't been successfully invaded in the last one thousand years. Everything you mentioned there was likewise used by English armies, likely under a different name.a LARP
>>172745811066 was less than a thousand years ago?1688 was less than a thousand years ago?British education is truly shining through isn't it?I also like how you refuted literally zero (0) of my points, yet I refuted all your bullshit.And it was all later adopted by British armies indeed, because they tend to bow and adapt when faced by German superiority.
>>17274502Are you only now realizing that shitposts are shitposts? And I know that you OP is a shitpost as well. >>17274520Shells filled with dedicated fragmentation pieces have been in existence since the 16th century. Henry Shrapnel just invented a design that worked slightly better.
>>17274530>this obviously goes to french resistanceYou can't be serious lol, the French resistance was just a minor inconvenience.
>>17274596>you said 1000 years instead of 958 years you horrible amoeba cunt
>>17274661Why do you post a false statement and then cry when called out on it?
>>17274693I'm not him
>>17274596>1066 was a thousand years agoobviously I was rounding up, retarded mick>1688>williamite warliterally not an invasion, he was invitedGermans are not superior to Britain in wars because in every war Britain fought Germany in Britain won. retard>>17274631>half of france literally called free france>le resistance was...le pointless>>17274661exactly
>>17274605>shitpostingThe German genius is not a meme, nor is the idea behind it originated in 4chan. It is an acknowledge fact
>>17274722>1668>dutch come over with an army numbering 40 000 and the largest fleet ever up until that point>depose the king, install dutch stadholder as a king>this is not an invasion to the british mindSo what exactly is an invasion?
>>17274748Were they invited?
>>17274748>government deposes an unjust king>asks a relative to come help get rid of him to restore british justice and institutions>he does sowoah I guess people coming on holiday here to spend money is an invasion to you fucking paddy retard
>>17274753>>17274754https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Russian_invasion_of_HollandAnglos invade Holland when asked to do so by the Dutch stadholder.Dutch do not "invade" England when they do the exact same thing some 100 years earlierCurious isn't it? Only the Dutch were actually succcesfull lmao
lol I just read wikipedia of the dutch invading the anglos. they killed less than fucking 50 anglos in the whole thing. what the fuck was everyone doing if they had numbers of nearly 50-60k people total invovled? raping catholic choir boys?
>>17274774Anglos are so weak they didn't even dare to resist.They also invited the anglo-saxon invaders, the vikings & the normans, it is in their nature to grovel and beg for servitude
>>17274774it actually sounds based. the king was captured by local fishermen. fuck catholics
if someone actually gave an indepth rundown of an individual epic german military mind and exactly what he did AND why it mattered, maybebut it's all just>name>some random shit everyone else has anyway
>>17274722"Free France" was a handful of irrelevant shithole colonies, everything else was only retaken thanks to the British and the Americans.
>>17274774Many people were neutral or receptive of the idea of William. That combined with the limp response from James made it relatively bloodless. It makes me laugh imagining him turning up as a foreign royal at some shitheap english coastal town and nobody being sure what to make of him. If the average person is a mong in the information age now, the peasants must've been turbo mongs.
>>17274870Here you go little niggerRothenberg, G. E. "Maurice of Nassau, Gustavus Adolphus, Raimondo Montecuccoli and the 'Military Revolution' of the 17th century" in P. Paret, G.A. Gordon and F. Gilbert (eds.), Makers of Modern Strategy (1986), pp. 32–63.
>>17274903>little niggerI'm white british protagonist of history krautlet>JUST READ THIS ENTIRE BOOK BROjust tell me
>>17274907Can you fucking read?It's just thirty pages, if you're too daft to read even that why do you even bother posting at all?
>>17274921non-british historians can't really be trusted
>>17274934The author literally served in the British Armed Forces you absolute mongoloid
>>17274921could you read it to me? I'm all tucked in bed and toasty
>>17274955>rothenBERG
>>17275071I hate france too, don't worry
cool men:franceportugalgay:germany spainnetherlands
>>17274502>Britain, or England, has had consistently the strongest land army in history since around the 11th century.lmao what
>>17275318>what is the SAS
>>17275321The SAS is a tiny special forces unit
>>17275321Scandinavian Airlines?
>>17275337yeah and they beat every single land army they ever fought. just as a small squad. bet you don't even know sbs or srr. same story real men.
stands for Super Army Soldiers
>>17274502Like all infantry tactics, division of labor in a tank, chemical weapons, rocket artillery, terror bombing. There's more, but what people actually do is underestimate how much innovation countries like Britain and USA also made during the same era or slightly after it.Take submarines for example, germans had amazing snorkels and torpedo tech, but their radar was so so and they completely deglected oceanography. No point in a ship that can go -600 feet if you don't know that heat pockets can hide you.
>>17274573Holy shit angloid btfo'd lmao
