[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Is Dunkirk proof WW2 was rigged?
>>
>>17275441
no just bad history anon
>>
Hitler should've done an amphibious landing at Dunkirk to capture all the Bongs.
>>
>>17275497
Hitler didn't have dick for amphibious capabilities, especially not for a heavily contested beach like Dunkirk, I mean his planned invasion of Britain was gonna rely on converted River barges
>>
>>17275497
Agree. Then they should have been enslaved to work on the Atlantic Wall, would have been built even faster. And with the total loss of the BEF Britain would have surrendered. But the POWs should not be returned for a decade at least, that is what happened to Germany irl.
>>
>>17275441
No, but it seems like it’s the new basement dweller internet person’s version of history, though. Been seeing it spammed a lot this past year.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.