>we know subjective experience exists>it seems impossible to derive it from purely non-experiential properties>therefore, it must be fundamental in some wayQED
>>17275553>it SEEMS impossible to derive it from purely non-experiential properties>therefore, it MUST BE fundamental in some wayDoes not follow. Your conclusion should be "therefore it seems to be fundamental in some way".
>>17275572you're right, should've double checked what I wrote, but my point still stands.