[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 254654765867679.jpg (90 KB, 601x505)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>history only remembers the kings, not the warriors

was he right?
>>
>>17275980
There is a slight anachronising feel to that quote. Were they really writing much, at that stage? How extensive would their histories have been? He's talking like he had access to read of centuries of history.
>>
>>17275995
I imagine he's referring to oral story retellings or songs.
>>
>>17275980
Most of the time yes but there are exceptions where certain commanders on the battlefield were praised too. It's almost impossible to see any mention of the soldiers themselves until very recently and even now nobody cares about them
>>
>>17275980
Considering that Achilles is more famous than Agamemnon, no.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.