Is Europe as culturally unified as it seems to be?
>>17277990Europeans have no culture
>>17277990Europe is the most diverse "global region" in the sense that everything else has one big group>East/SEA - China>Mena - Arabs>SSA - Bantu >South Asia - Indians/Hindooz>Latam - mestizos>North-America - Anglo-Germanic Americans >Austria - Anglos >Central Asia - Turkics Whereas Europe is pretty evently divided between Germanics, Latins, and Slavs. So it is more diverse than the other "great regions" of the world. Another schema: The UN geoscheme is pretty good to define world regions in an "officially recognized" albeit loose sense.
>>17277990Anglos making maps is cringe as fuck
>>17278191Pretty muchAt the same europe is still sufficiently culturally distant from north africa and west asia that exclusive clubs like the EU form.
>>17278191>Mena >South Asia My nigga you can't actually believe that Germanics and Latins are anywhere as different as for example a Northern Pajeet and a Southern one And the Maghreb don't even speak arabic, their "arabic" is arab in name only, this is without mentioning Iran and Turkey
>>17278191Europeans are genetically closer than the Pajeet ethnic groups and even in China there is more genetic distance than between an Iberian and a Finn. The race of Europe is Europoid and they are genetically and culturally connected.
>>17278219Genetically they're close. Culturally way different.
>>17278210Northern and Southern Pajeets are both Hindu whereas Britain is Protestant, Italy is Catholic, and Romania is Orthodox.
>>17278222There are also cultural differences between the Japanese and Chinese.
