https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1919Parisv01/d35>In regard to Bulgaria our greatest asset is the possibility of satisfying her just claims>No just or lasting settlement of the tangled problems confronting the deeply wronged peoples of the Balkans can be based upon the arbitrary treaty of Bucharest. That treaty was a product of the evil diplomacy which the peoples of the world are now determined to end. That treaty wronged every nation in the Balkans, even those which it appeared to favor, by imposing upon them all the permanent menace of war. It unquestionably tore men and women of Bulgarian loyalty from their natural allegiance.>Certain broad considerations, however, may tentatively be kept in mind. They are in brief these: 1) that the area annexed by Rumania in the Dobrudja is almost surely Bulgarian in character and should be returned; 2) that the boundary between Bulgaria and Turkey should be restored to the Enos-Midia line, as agreed upon at the conference of London; 3) that the south boundary of Bulgaria should be the Aegean Sea coast from Enos to the gulf of Orfano, and should leave the mouth of the Struma river in Bulgarian territoryAll true by the way.
Bulgaria is the cradle of Slavic identity. Bulgarians invented Cyrillic. They were the Prussia of the Balkans.They were conspired against by the eternal Serbs, Greeks, Romanians, and T*rks. They were 100% correct to wage the Second Balkan War, and could have won if they actually had a plan rather than just a general impromptu attack. Bulgaria was the main reason the Balkan League won the First Balkan War, and could have easily taken Serbia, Greece and Montenegro on their own. But Ferdinand I failed to secure his flanks or even formulate a proper plan.
>>17278289Pfft, stay mad Krum
