Can you be loyal to the Quran and the Constitution? Or does following the Quran effectively make you an enemy of the Constitution?
>>17278339>Can you be loyal to the Quran and the Constitution? No.>does following the Quran effectively make you an enemy of the Constitution?Yes.>55. Your allies are God, and His Messenger, and those who believe—those who pray regularly, and give charity, while bowing down.>56. Whoever allies himself with God, and His Messenger, and those who believe—surely the Party of God is the victorious.>57. O you who believe! Do not befriend those who take your religion in mockery and as a sport, be they from among those who were given the Scripture before you, or the disbelievers. And obey God, if you are believers.>3. Follow what is revealed to you from your Lord, and do not follow other masters beside Him. Little you recollect.Glad I could help.
The Quran says to violently subjugate non-Muslims and make them pay higher taxes. The constitution says freedom of religion is gurantee.
The Muslim presence in the US predates the Constitution by centuries.>>17278533>The constitution says freedom of religion is gurantee.The US Constitution allows others to believe what they want (within parameters). It's literally the First Amendment. Ever read it? Burning the flag or pissing on the Constitution is protected by the Constitution.>The Quran says to violently subjugate non-MuslimsNo, that's not a command.>>17278339>Can you be loyal to the Quran and the Constitution? Or does following the Quran effectively make you an enemy of the Constitution?The Constitution doesn't demand "loyalty". The premise of your question is fallacious. The two people who took the bait just outed themselves as retards, kek.Even the founders of the US and subsequent governments didn't follow the Constitution like it was meant to on paper, nor did every founder like it. There was a whole faction that opposed it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Federalism
>>17279394>kekNigger retard muslim calling pagan gods.Watch out, the big space arab is displeased with you.
>>17279413Why yes, the early Muslim Americans were indeed Black. Now they fuck your mom.
>>17279394>The Muslim presence in the US predates the Constitution by centuries.not an argument kek
>>17279394>The Constitution doesn't demand "loyalty".Of course it does. There is a Republic and its Constitution. If you follow a book with commandments that contradict the commandments of the Constitution, that makes you an enemy of the Constitution.
>>17279394>The Muslim presence in the US predates the Constitution by centuries.How many centuries? Are you referring to African slaves or are you suggesting that Muslims got there before Columbus? I remember seeing a post several years ago about the Puritans being "crypto-Muslims", I don't buy it.
>>17280002>are you suggesting that Muslims got there before Columbus?There's a schizo theory from some muslim woman "historian" that american tribes had been contacted by muslim sailors and converted to islam. I even brought her book when I was a muslim.
>>17280932bought*
>>17279394This anon is retarded
