Why are Hindu gods aesthetic more congruent with space and QM?
>>17278342The indo-european religions in generally are far closer to truth and the correct understanding of reality than the abrahamic or semetic religions
>>17278342>>17278395Oh my Vishnu!!! Let's celebrate with some cow dung cookies and cow piss cola!!!
>>17278452The indo European religions are closer to truth than abrahamic ones>Verification not required.
>>17278460Agreed Saar yummy cow shit mmmm
>>17278472I'm not Indian.The indo European religions are closer to the truth than abrahamic ones.
>>17278481*sips gau mutra*
>>17278342Geography mostly. You notice the Aryan practices deviate once the migration to the west occurs.
>>17278452Thirdies arguing over whether camel piss and prophet shit or cow piss and shit is better to eat will never stop being funny to me
>>17278452ad hominem dumbassery. drink bleach
>>17278342Dharmic cosmology is bigger in that it incorporates numerous physical and spiritual realms and states of existencesAbrahamic religions in contrast, focus on a divide between the physical world and the spiritual world (heaven, hell)
>>17278494I'm not hindu or Indian.The Indo European religions are closer to truth than the abrahamic ones
>>17278342You worship a blue elephant, how is that any less retarded than worshipping a flying jew?
>>17279477The wisdom is another level up
>>17278395>>17278481>>17278342Well no. The Hindu cosmology aligns with a cyclic cosmology and god being synonymous with the self. Both of which are very up for debate and would imply a 1 electron universe >>17279303No the dharmic religions focus on your plane of existence being in accordance with your karma or ability to transcend samsara while the abrahamic religions focus on how knowledgeable you are of god dictating where your at. Think in Vedic cosmology the metric is good or evil that puts you higher or lower while in abrahamic religions the metric is closeness to god
>>17279498>Well no. The Hindu cosmology aligns with a cyclic cosmology and god being synonymous with the self. Both of which are very up for debate and would imply a 1 electron universeThis all closer to truth than the abrahamic conceptualization
>>17279512The Abrahamic (Christian specifically) aligns with the multiverse. Cyclical and multiversal are both valid interpretations of QW
>>17279521QW?
>>17279554QM* my bad, a dyslexic typo. Tho desu, if you couldn’t glean that from context clues you not be ready to talk about these ideas anyhow
>>17279521Indo European theology also works with a multiverse
>>17279602Jacob Barandes falsified the Schrodinger equation as well as Hilbert spacesas descriptions of quantum phenomena
>>17279617Not really but I’d love to hear why you think so?>>17279622Lmao no barandes didn’t, he has a theory of how classical physics magically mimics the Schrödinger equation but you can never prove him wrong cause he’s a pseud. Also no one thinks “hilbert space” is an exact 1 to 1 with physical reality but that’s only because of the nuance found in the astounding amount of possibilities of the natural world emanating from a 0D point and Hilbert space is a huge grouping of those possibilities.Barandes is a paid shill via his tenure (even if he’s not aware of it yet) for a power structure wanting an atheistic materialistic “scientific” worldview to easily shove down peoples throat given current understandings point to much toward god. I wouldn’t listen to this largely untalented physicist
>>17279715>Lmao no barandes didn’t, he has a theory of how classical physics magically mimics the Schrödinger equation but you can never prove him wrong cause he’s a pseudHis derivation is correct. Where are you claiming the flaw is?>Barandes is a paid shill via his tenure (even if he’s not aware of it yet) for a power structure wanting an atheistic materialistic “scientific” worldview to easily shove down peoples throat given current understandings point to much toward god. I wouldn’t listen to this largely untalented physicistDelusional cope and seethe
>>17279718Flat out no it’s not. He has put forth no lowest unit of quanta and all he has proposed is something that maybe could kind of mimic the Schrödinger equation if you don’t look at how horrible its predictive capabilities are in comparison to standard QM theory in relation to the natural worldIs that you barandes? Listen to me brother, we both know why you got the contract for that BS and it wasn’t because of your brilliance. It’s because it falls in line with an orthodoxy that is slowly losing the battle to more enlightened minds. Get back to your coils bro
>>17278395>>17278460>>17278481>>17279318>>17279512Why do you think its true?
