[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: opium war.jpg (198 KB, 1040x681)
198 KB
198 KB JPG
Would another Opium war fix relations with China?
>>
>>17282841
Relative to whom desu?
>>
>>17282841
Yes china btfo the west would make them calm down and also make the west more humble too.
>>
China is the North mate.
(Northern Hemisphere)
>>
>>17282841
The modern opium war happened, its called the Korean war, and the combined strength of the west was unable to dislodge China from North Korea
>>
File: mighty shills.png (1.6 MB, 1042x1006)
1.6 MB
1.6 MB PNG
>Would another Opium war fix relations with China?
>>
>>17283318
>the combined strength of the west was unable to dislodge China from North Korea
Neither could China remove Americans from South Korea. So stalemate, but do you really want WW3 over Korea in the 1950s?
>>
>>17283318
Korea war has nothing to do with Opium retard
>>
File: korean war victory.png (1.84 MB, 1112x1598)
1.84 MB
1.84 MB PNG
>>17283318

The combined strength of China, North Korea, and the Soviet Union could not expel American forces from South Korean, Taiwan, or Taiwan.
>>
>>17283646
>The combined strength of China, North Korea, and the Soviet Union could not expel American forces from South Korean, Taiwan, or Taiw-ACK

Preach, shill, preach.
>>
File: Massari.jpg (57 KB, 640x640)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
Uhh... Fentanyl?
>>
>>17283683
>North Vietnam only fully invaded South Vietnam when most US troops already left the region after the peace treaty was signed
>>
>>17283318
Resident Schizo
>>
>>17282841
I dont think england is winning this time
>>
>>17283566
>do you really want WW3 over Korea in the 1950s?
In 1860 and 1900 European expeditionary forces effortlessly marched right into Beijing, without fearing a "great war". In 1950 a similar western alliance showed up near the Chinese border but this time were never able to breach it, let alone reach any Chinese city. Your argument that ww3 was not worth it is already a concession, that a modern day opium war is similarly impossible.
>>
>>17283783
They couldn't even keep Hong Kong, and now they're afraid of even bringing up Hong Kong



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.