[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Nietzsche.jpg (1.84 MB, 1956x2940)
1.84 MB
1.84 MB JPG
Does /his/ think there is anything beyond the physical universe? Or is the physical world the only world? To me, the only real tangible thing we can point to that potentially posits the existence of "something more" is consciousness itself. Regardless whether free will exists or not, the fact that you are not just some biological automaton machine but are actually a "thing" that experiences things doesn't seem to have any explanation in the material world, but beyond that I can't really think of anything else. The seeming "order" of the universe can be considered as well but who knows what the fuck that actually means.
>>
>>17282934
I have no idea and I am sceptical of all positive assertions for or against the matter
>>
the "physical universe" you speak of is just an idea we use to explain our phenomenological experiences

that alone disproves materialism
>>
Guys like Rene Guenon and Evola talk about the world of Being which is counter to presocratic philosophers notions of the world being in Flux.
>>
I think the will to power is Nietzsche's on vision of metaphysics that touches upon the notion that "true" knowledge comes from intuition or intuitive knowledge similar to how a lot of Perennial thinkers like Evola talk about the "supra-rational". The difference between the two seem to only be in one having root in a naturalist worldview and the other in a metaphysical but both representing the same thing.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.