Why isn`t this possible?
>>17316981Because Easterners refuse to acknowledge the primacy of the Pope.
>>17316983the popes in question
>>17316987Those are only a handful of popes, and none of them delegitimize the office that Christ has established on earth.
>>17316992The Pope RIGHT NOW
>>17316994>that must not resemble marriage.
>>17316995>Sodomy is le good
>>17316996>Source: my ass.
>>17316995>still waiting for the pope to excommunicate Fr. James Martin.It’ll happen any day now.It’s not like he is a close friend of the pope and is in good standing with the church
>>17316999Again, none of this delegitimizes the Church that Christ has established.
>>17317001>cognitive dissonance
>>17317002Francis has made mistakes, James Martin is a wicked man.Neither of them will make me lose faith in Christ's Church.
>>17317004Who are you with your fallible mind to say the pope has made mistakes. The magisterium can’t make mistakes. Truth is relative to what the church says. >more cognitive dissonance There is no hope for you.
>>17317007>Who are you with your fallible mind to say the pope has made mistakes.The pope is not infallible. Only when he's speaking Ex Cathedra.>The magisterium can’t make mistakes.Why are you bringing up the Magisterium? What do they have to do with Francis?
>>17317012There is no infallible list of ex cathedra statements. If I ask 1000 papists how many ex cathedra statements there are, I will get 1000 different answers. So what you’re saying is meaningless. Also fidducia supplicans is official church doctrine. This has nothing to do with ex cathedra statements. The church cannot err on doctrine. You are being a schismatic for saying it the pope has made a mistake and James Martin is wicked. >why are you bringing up the magisterium?The pope is part of the magisterium.
>>17317030>There is no infallible list of ex cathedra statements. If I ask 1000 papists how many ex cathedra statements there are, I will get 1000 different answers.There's two.> This has nothing to do with ex cathedra statements.You're the one who brought up papal infallibility.
>>17316987It's funny because orthodogs were fine with the first 3, they didn't excommunicate them or anything.
>>17317034>there’s twoDo You claim to have infallible authority that there has only been two ex cathedra statements? You’re no better than a strawman sola scripturist. Other papist will say the pope has spoken infallibly 10 times, 9 times, 8 times, etc, so your infallible pronouncement that there is only two is meaningless. The magisterium hasn’t created an infallible list of ex cathedra statements. If there is no list then you can’t say there is only two. >You’re the one that brought up papal infallibility. You’re the one saying the pope has erred on doctrine with fidducia supplicans.
>>17317054>Do You claim to have infallible authority that there has only been two ex cathedra statements?No, I'm just stating a fact. The first one was her Immaculate Conception, declared by Pope Pius IX in 1854And the second one was her bodily Assumption into heaven declared by Pope Pius XII in 1950>ou’re the one saying the pope has erred on doctrineNever said either of this, I only say that Francis has made mistakes. One of which were his statements while in Indonesia.
>>17317061>Im just stating a fact>no infallible list providedCool. just like another papist will just state the fact that the people has spoken infallibly 5 times. Or when 20 gazorpillion protties say their interpretation of scripture is just stating facts. Until you find the infallible list you can be filtered.
>>17316994>he takes what a Jesuit says at face valueLol, lmao even
>>17317081>>no infallible list providedI already gave it to you.1. Immaculate Conception, declared by Pope Pius IX in 18542. Her bodily Assumption into heaven declared by Pope Pius XII in 1950>just like another papist will just state the fact that the people has spoken infallibly 5 times. Tell me, is this papist with us in the room right now?>Or when 20 gazorpillion protties say their interpretation of scripture is just stating facts. You have neither, the Orthodox church has been fragmented for centuries.
>>17316981Could someone give me the link for Orthodox chud in the centreI can't find it on the 'roo
>>17316999>2 more monthsthe pope is trans+
>>17316996>Ezekiel 16:49-50>49 Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had arrogance, plenty of food, and carefree ease, but she did not help the poor and needy. >50 So they were haughty and committed abominations before Me. Therefore I removed them when I saw it.>Genesis 19:5-9>5 and they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them.” >6 But Lot went out to them at the doorway, and shut the door behind him, >7 and said, “Please, my brothers, do not act wickedly. >8 Now look, I have two daughters who have not had relations with any man; please let me bring them out to you, and do to them whatever you like; only do not do anything to these men, because they have come under the shelter of my roof.” >9 But they said, “Get out of the way!” They also said, “This one came in as a foreigner, and already he is acting like a judge; now we will treat you worse than them!” So they pressed hard against Lot and moved forward to break the door.You bear false witness regarding the meaning of the word.
>>17317085>I already gave it to you. Your opinion is not the infallible list. >is this papist with us in the room right now?There are many papists that will say the pope has spoken infallibly more than twice. Feigning ignorance won’t help you. https://x.com/whpub/status/1782539911738036697
>>17316981Well, the Eastern Orthodox are is schism and have questionable Trinitarian theology, and the Protestants just believe in straight up heresies like Sola fide, Sola Scriptura, etc.
>>17316981the ortho catho schism is the strangest one...revising the theology such that the spirit comes also from the son was necessary because some bullshitter monarchies in europe were claiming that they were literally descendants of Jesus and so their "spirit" made them being king of the other "spirit" acceptable. of course you almost never hear it discussed anymore in that context
>>17319236>Protestants just believe in straight up heresies like Sola fide,>pope Francis-all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err.Submit to your bishop larper.
>>17319242
I just don't get how you can look at Rome and go like: Yeah, this is the stuff, this is what Jesus was talking about
>>17316981It seems like Catholics are doing the bulk of the shitflinging desu
