[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>>
>>17317167
>>
>>17317020
charlemagne = dutch
HRE = greater dutch empire
Habsburgs were dutch, hohenzollerns were dutch, dutch was the main language of commerce and science
>>
>>17317865
Maybe you're right about Dutch people but that doesn't prove my point wrong. Did Germany have any other great leader who succeeded in the long run apart from Frederick II? Didn't Bismarck fail almost as bad as his Prussian successors? Isn't it true that both Habsburgs and Carolingians regardless of whether they were Dutch or something else were certainly not related to modern Germans?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.