Catholicism is based on a LIE. The lie is that Peter was the supreme leader of the church. This is not apostolic tradition, and even goes against the Bible, the infallible written record of the apostles, which refuses to centralize Peter in the leadership dispute of 1 Cor 1. Repent of your western errors and become Orthodox.
Orthodox portray Jesus and Mary as brown/swarthy. Catholics knew Jesus was white (yes he was literally a white man, a Persian Essene magi descended from Scythians)
>>17410551But didn’t Jesus build his church on Peter the rock? St. John of Damascus, Homily on the transfiguration #9, Patrolgoia Graeca, 96:560>But why did He [Jesus] take along Peter and James and John? Peter, because he wanted to show him that the witness, which [Peter] had truly borne, was now confirmed by the witness of hte Father, and to make credible His [i.e. Jesus’] own statement that the heavenly Father had revealed this to him [i. e. Peter]; and because as president he was also receiving the oars of the entire Church>>17410619I’m not sure about this, do you have any proof of it?I will talk about the filioque in the next post if you are interested.Also just a question, does orthodoxy teach that there is no salvation outside of the Eastern Orthodox Church?
>>17412116Are you seriously claiming that Peter had supreme, full, immediate and universal authority over all Christians? Or did this doctrine “develop”?
>>17413084So over how many Christians did he have authority? And what do you mean by authority?
>>17414051He didn’t have authority over the other apostles, authority was collegial and shared.
>>17413084Jesus would have known how his words would be interpreted, and that this would lead to the papacy.
>>17415363God would have known that his Torah would lead to rabbinic Judaism. So what?
