Thoughts on Jung?
>>17429092Satanist
>>17429092a fraud, charlatan, sham (see also: freud, marx)
>>17429095>>17429133Jung had absolutely nothing to do with Marx, and broke with many of Freud's most fundamental theories. Jung was certainly not a Satanist by any metric either, and was deeply attached to both his European-Christian heritage, and the non-dual religious philosophies of Asia.
>>17429092sodomite
>>17429164He was known for numerous affairs with WOMEN, not men, you retard.
>>17429173he sodomised women
>>17429092Child rapist.
>>17429196No such thing. Every woman's orifices are technically part of the vagina.
Nazi
He said a lot of bullshit but also some profound stuff. Freud overall was more wise, but Jung was more in touch with the subconscious. This is of course a double edge knife and if you have read the Red Book you know what this means and how hard it is to keep it together in a coherent narrative for yourself.
>>17429226Also got involved with a patient, never get involved with patients because you lose yourself.
>>17429173>>17429203fornication is a ruinous sin
>>17429226He's a retard that only convinces even more retarded people that he's not a retard.>let me make up some shit about a shadow-self>it'll convince people decades in the future that it's really deep>never prove anything>everything gets disproven
Tax cheat
>>17429092Interesting but largely untestable ideas. Kinda similar to Joseph Campbell in a sense.
>>17429356>untestable ideasWhy?>Kinda similar to Joseph Campbell in a sense.How do you mean?
>>17429092Makes more sense when you realize the archetypes are patterns in brain structure rather than Platonic forms emerging out of some mystical higher plane of existence. A few years before he passed away, he said this:>I have long thought that, if there is any analogy between psychic and physiological processes, the organizing system of the brain must lie subcortically on the brain stem. This conjecture arose out of considering the psychology of an archetype [the Self] of central importance and universal distribution represented in mandala symbols. … The reason that lead me to conjecture a localization of a physiological basis for this archetype in the brain stem was the psychological fact that besides being specifically characterized by the ordering and orienting role, its uniting properties are predominantly affective. I would conjecture that such a subcortical system might somehow reflect characteristic of the archetypal form of the unconscious.In other words, the older parts of the brain (e.g., the brain stem) contain older archetypes from our evolutionary history, which also means that archetypes aren't solely human either.
filthy pervert.
cancer enabler
Bump.
>>17429092He's a fascinating figure. I enjoy learning about him the same way I enjoy learning about people like Agrippa or John Dee.
>>17429198?
He was based.https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLr0wsqIKluluuAB0Qckixb70D3K1kePoE&si=-iLYUNRFELoZ9376