[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Thoughts on Jung?
>>
>>17429092
Satanist
>>
>>17429092
a fraud, charlatan, sham (see also: freud, marx)
>>
>>17429095
>>17429133
Jung had absolutely nothing to do with Marx, and broke with many of Freud's most fundamental theories. Jung was certainly not a Satanist by any metric either, and was deeply attached to both his European-Christian heritage, and the non-dual religious philosophies of Asia.
>>
>>17429092
sodomite
>>
>>17429164
He was known for numerous affairs with WOMEN, not men, you retard.
>>
>>17429173
he sodomised women
>>
>>17429092
Child rapist.
>>
>>17429196
No such thing. Every woman's orifices are technically part of the vagina.
>>
Nazi
>>
He said a lot of bullshit but also some profound stuff. Freud overall was more wise, but Jung was more in touch with the subconscious. This is of course a double edge knife and if you have read the Red Book you know what this means and how hard it is to keep it together in a coherent narrative for yourself.
>>
>>17429226

Also got involved with a patient, never get involved with patients because you lose yourself.
>>
>>17429173
>>17429203
fornication is a ruinous sin
>>
>>17429226
He's a retard that only convinces even more retarded people that he's not a retard.
>let me make up some shit about a shadow-self
>it'll convince people decades in the future that it's really deep
>never prove anything
>everything gets disproven
>>
Tax cheat
>>
>>17429092
Interesting but largely untestable ideas. Kinda similar to Joseph Campbell in a sense.
>>
>>17429356
>untestable ideas
Why?
>Kinda similar to Joseph Campbell in a sense.
How do you mean?
>>
>>17429092
Makes more sense when you realize the archetypes are patterns in brain structure rather than Platonic forms emerging out of some mystical higher plane of existence. A few years before he passed away, he said this:

>I have long thought that, if there is any analogy between psychic and physiological processes, the organizing system of the brain must lie subcortically on the brain stem. This conjecture arose out of considering the psychology of an archetype [the Self] of central importance and universal distribution represented in mandala symbols. … The reason that lead me to conjecture a localization of a physiological basis for this archetype in the brain stem was the psychological fact that besides being specifically characterized by the ordering and orienting role, its uniting properties are predominantly affective. I would conjecture that such a subcortical system might somehow reflect characteristic of the archetypal form of the unconscious.

In other words, the older parts of the brain (e.g., the brain stem) contain older archetypes from our evolutionary history, which also means that archetypes aren't solely human either.
>>
filthy pervert.
>>
cancer enabler
>>
Bump.
>>
>>17429092
He's a fascinating figure. I enjoy learning about him the same way I enjoy learning about people like Agrippa or John Dee.
>>
>>17429198
?
>>
He was based.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLr0wsqIKluluuAB0Qckixb70D3K1kePoE&si=-iLYUNRFELoZ9376



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.