Giant elaborate churches are a substitute for faith and an overcompensation for a lack of faith.>but muh beautyIrrelevant>muh feelingsYou're feeling the demons possessing the idols there.
>>17430069By your logic, humanity shouldn't do *anything* cool because it might be construed as showboating.
>>17430069You are correct that building and maintaining beautiful churches is not a substitute for faith, but to suggest it is idolatry is absurd.
This is just done to keep the peasants busy and in awe and the tradesmen happy.
It is my opinion the tech these churches used to have could heal. Not only through music but whatever else there was that was powered through the aether.
>>17430069It is the house of God, a fortress for his respite and for him to deliberate regarding his will for the earth, a bulwark against the dark which seeks his destruction.
Protestants now have to claim the Middle Ages lacked faith because admitting to how much their movement secularized Europe would be too much for them to handle.
>>17430069God is beautiful Beauty is an attribute of GodIf churches are beautiful people think of beauty...
>>17430069>Beauty is irrelevantDie.
>>17430108>but to suggest it is idolatry is absurd.Nobody in their right mind suggested that.
