Every dualistic ideology reveals itself as an intellectual crutch for minds too fragile to face reality without training wheels. These childish divisions of existence into opposing forces - whether moral, political, or metaphysical - are nothing but comfort blankets for those who can't handle complexity. What arrogance, to think the vast cosmos conforms to your simplistic categories, your playground notions of teams and sides. Those who peddle these binary worldviews are either deluded or manipulative, selling easy answers to difficult questions. The universe simply IS - raw, undivided, utterly indifferent to human attempts to sort it into convenient boxes. Every prophet and ideologue who pushes these dualistic fantasies exposes themselves as a philosophical infant, still needing the safety rails of false dichotomies rather than confronting existence in its overwhelming totality.

>>17430142
Covered by the blood of God, all which preserves his people from death may be done in his name. God is bias in that his own he loved most and for them perfection was his sacrifice. It was done so that all of God would be brought back into one body to do his will, resurrected upon the earth the God which was always the only true God.

>>17430157
Why is it that whenever someone posts something contrary to Christianity, Christians come out just to post the gist of their religion and add nothing else to the conversation? Is it just to reassure themselves?

>>17430157
Holy fuck the state of christcucks and their turbosperg writing style. Every single post reads like they think they're dropping the most profound philosophical truth bomb ever conceived by man. Pure cringe watching them try to sound deep with their flowery emotional language and gay-ass metaphors, like some 14-year-old who just discovered their first bible verse. These absolute mouthbreathers really think adding seven adjectives about "divine celestial blessed holy sacred pure truth" makes their room temperature IQ takes sound intelligent. Pure second-hand embarrassment watching them type like they're writing fucking Shakespeare every time they regurgitate the same NPC programming they've been spouting for centuries. Imagine being such a turbosperg you can't make a single point without turning it into some overwrought emotional sermon complete with dramatic pauses and rhetorical questions. Maximum kek at these subhumans thinking their purple prose makes their medieval fairy tales sound more convincing.

>>17430168
It is best to answer the question which provides the truth than to engage with false assertions that lead into darkness. You are welcome for you have received the answer to the question you should have asked.

>>17430174
I didn't ask a question in the OP, I was just telling you how it really is

It very clearly says in the Bible that after we ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil that we became like God (בראשית 3:22).

This implies that God had knowledge of good and evil, which could mean that he has the capacity to actualize evil (ישעיה 45:7)

As we can see in the verse from Genesis, the only thing that separates man from God in the Biblical narrative is the fruit of the tree of life, or immortality.

But altogether I suspect that if we were to come to our potential as Gods with knowledge of primordial good and evil that we would shed morality. From our perspective here we would be utterly terrifying beings of pure free agency.

If you read the early Biblical narratives closely, it's apparent that the God character is very afraid of us as well. Ever wonder why?

The Lord said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them." (11:6 בראשית).

>>17430168
Yeah, it's well known Christians are very insecure.