>professor fails me for using BC and AD in my paperfucking godless assholes love to flaunt their atheist religion
>>17430730so did this actually happen to you or are you making this up to feel oppressed, because in the rare case it did happen you could easily appeal to the collage board if that really is the only reason your professor failed you
>hurr ima be a contrarian edgelord like I was in HS and do something I was instructed not to do and own da libs.I hope they expel you.
>>17430730I actually failed you because your mother gives toothy head
I get asking you to conform to the standards of your particular field but failing you for that?Your professor is like that angry atheist professor in God's not dead who just hates God and is triggered by themI suggest you make a complaint
>>17430792he could have very well failed for other reasons, just the BC/AD thing is what he chose to post about. I had professor who dock you points for not using BCE/CE but they you could still get a good grade using them if your paper was well written.
>>17430730They are still using Christ's birth as the basis of their dating system, schuffling the letters around doesn't change that, pick a better hill to die on
>Tiw>Woden>Thunor>Frig>Saturn>I guess the sun and moon could be debatable>Janus>February's name originates from a religious festival>Mars>etymology of April is debated but may or may not be a deity too>Maia>Juno>Julius Caesar and Augustus were both deifiedIf Christians didn't care enough to remove all the pagan names for two thousand years I really don't see what difference one more deity makes.
