how come there's no society that developed to be polyamorous or even swingers in general? why has the nuclear family always cropped up everywhere? other animals are not like that, they couple up with different partners to reproduce.
>>17430974Because men fucking hate cuckshit
>>17430976One man and two women?
>>17430974Because you won't convince men to feed and shelter a woman or whatever slides out of her innards unless he is reasonably confident that he's the one responsible for it.
>>17430986Numerous societies are polygynous though, in fact historically speaking worldwide societies with it are probably more common than without.
>>17430974There actually is though. It’s called the Trobriand islands. Children literally engage in intercourse with their siblings while the parents watch. It is Sodom and Gomorrah
>>17430997examples? anyway it didn't develop into modernity at all. the nuclear family really is the top evolutionary choice.>>17431064never heard of them will take a look.
>>17431304Go to marriage customshttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trobriand_people#:~:text=Trobriand%20children%20as%20young%20as,They%20change%20partners%20often.
>>17430986Thats unsustainable because the anger of surplus males will eventually be harnessed by sociopathic demagogues who direct them to burn everything down in an attempt to size power for themselves.
planet isn't wealthy enough, yet. i have a theory that affluent families that can afford 5+ children produce far more girls than boys. i saw that shit all the time when i was mormon. once (IF) we progress out of capitalism into some form is quasi post scarcity the male to female ratio will skew to 1/2-1/3 then every guy can have a small harem and probably share harems.
>>17431312I've read it. doesn't seem as crazy as what you said. didn't see anything about having sex in front of parents or Sodom and Gomorrah. they start having sex younger, sure, but that's about it. and lest be honest if we could get pussy by 14-15 we would've.
>>174313251) the only way for that to happen is through a super intelligence ai. And even then it is doubtful, capitalism really seems invincible.2) There's literally zero proof rich people or populations have more female kids lmao. wtf.seems like a cool scenario tho.
>>17430974>how come there's no society that developed to be polyamorous or even swingers in general?Because it's genetic suicide for males.Do you not understand how evolution works?
>>17431355Losing your virginity between 14 and 16 is common in the entire third world
