[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Was Euromaidan a popular revolution or a CIA coup?
>>
Ukrainians love the CIA and American semen so I think it is entirely plausible for it to be both at the same time
>>
>>17431589
How?
>>
>>17431606
The CIA was involved and Ukrainians enthusiastically went along with it
>>
>>17431606
Chuds think that the CIA just whispers sweet nothings into people's ears and then they try to overthrow their government that they would otherwise completely adore. It's a very low IQ way to view the world.
>>
>>17431612
I do not believe that the Ukrainians would adore their government, but government do not spontaneously get overthrown just by being disliked, especially in the modern day
>>
File: w068kwuvkwd51.png (866 KB, 4500x5524)
866 KB
866 KB PNG
>>17431612
I'm not a chud, I'm a commie
>>
>>17431646
Literally the Same thing
>>
>>17431585
yeah, the CIA must have bribed all those people
>>
>>17431617
It wasn't overthrown spontaneously though
>>
>>17431646
Even your retarded map doesn't mark Ukraine
>>
>>17431585
Not history yet but it was popular and Zelensky ran for president on pro western platform
>>
Was Yanukovich based or cringe? I've also read somewhere that he wasn't pro-Russia, just "neutralist". Is that true?
>>
>>17431757
If he was based, he wouldn't have fled the country the second the situation got too hot to handle.
>>
>>17431585
It was a fight between one faction of oligarchs and another with the help of popular discontent. Nothing more, nothing less.

The CIA theory is equivalent to the delusion that the Russians did January 6, when in fact it's just Republicans fighting with Democrats.
>>
>>17431757
>he wasn't pro-Russia, just "neutralist"
Yes. He tried to play both sides, but at the crucial moment chose Russia
>>
>>17431585
Both, in a sense that it was popular enough to not cause much resistance from the 90% of population in the western part that didn't care about it but it's also not a secret that it was directly funded by us state dept and EU
>>17431757
In ukraine they call eachother "Pro Russian" even if none of them really are, he was more anti Russia leaning president who played with idea of joining EU and fucked over gas pipe
>>
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/494344521



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.