Whats the difference between Yamnaya, Sintashta, Abashevo, Samara, Fatyanovo, Catacomb, Poltavka, Corded Ware, Bell Beaker, Srubnaya, etc
>>17434120Many differences...Cultural differences, linguistic differences, features differences etc etcThey were so distant to each other like a Spaniard is from the Finns for example.But they all had some things in common:Barbaric stone users
>>17434136Which of them came to Europe? Did different European regions get completely genetically different Indo European tribes from each other?
>>17434138>Which of them came to Europe?Mainly the westen CWC, and and later, the bell beakers who are the origin of 1/3 of all European groups we know. yamnaya set foot in the Balkans and the Aegean, but it was not very significant. it is their source.>Did different European regions get completely genetically different Indo European tribes from each other?Yes. As we enter Europe, we have a massive increase in ANF ancestry, averaging almost 50/50.and in the eastern branches, we have an increase in Bmac and Asian ancestry. and the lifestyle changed drastically, with only the Scythians being pastoralists and the Indo-Europeans of Europe basically adopting large-scale agriculture. but as I said, "purity" only remained for at least 1000 years. see Indo-Europeans like the Spanish, colonizing various locations and intermarrying with native women.and don't buy the idea of genocide caused by a bunch of 1.50 tall and weak Turks... no. It's like saying that the natives forced the Spanish and gave away their women. it was a spontaneous mix.
>>17434144>50/50I was wrong More like something between 40% and 40%. But yeah, they weren't "pure"
>>17434120Samara doesn't belong here. They were hunter gatherers from Volga, who knows if they were even Indo-Europeans. The PIE genetics starts with Khvalynsk and related cultures.
>>17434120 At the same time yamnaya was 50 50 CHG/EHG similar to daghstanis today
>>17434150>>17434151EHGs did look nothing like modern eastern-Europeans. EHG and CHG_Iran mixed yamnaya would have looked nothing like modern Europeans.CHG_Iran constitutes 40% of Yamnaya genome, while the majority is EHG (a mix between WHG and ANE). EHG would have looked very Asian before they mixed with CHG_Iran and became Yamnaya. I believe Yamnaya practiced early on selective breeding in eastern-Europe, DNA results from early Corded Ware culture shows little signs to blond hair and blue eyes, it’s seems that it was developed during the Bronze Age in the Baltic and Northern countries, after the Yamnaya invasion.
>>17434120ANE came from South-East Asia before R and Q split as a haplogroup.
>>17434120
>>17434120Aryans=Indo-European They were all Europeans
>>17434161Shitty chart. Very anachronistic >>17434162Buddy ur a deracinated amerimutt with no concept of which plague ridden ghetto in Europe ur landless peasant ancestors fled from Don't have the audacity to talk abt the migration of my ancestors when your ancestors were steppe pastoralists, not aryans who split off early on
>>17434165> Shitty chart. Very anachronisticwhyexplain
>>17434120Its annoying as fuck because shitty "cultural anthropologists" have designated the same three groups of people in europe each with over a dozen different names. I think they do it to try and make their own contributions to the field of research seem more important, like they discovered something special when all it really does is convolute what is actually a relatively simple story about what the white people all did in europe, the near east, and north africa.
