Why does Galicia have more “North African” admixture than southern Spain even though the former was occupied the least, and the latter was occupied the most by Al Andalus?So Al Andalus is not responsible for the “North African” component in Spaniards?Ive heard about it being from the Neolithic and Roman Era, so how much is it from each era?Is it true that they are 11% North African, and 5% of that is Iberomaurusian from the Neolithic?
>>17436578The inquisition was less in Galicia. How does Galicia compare to Extremadura?
How much "north african" is iberian?
>>174365961-6%, Highest levels are in the western half of Iberia, Portugal and Galicia>>17436578It has to be ancient Ibero-Maurician, the Arabs who conquered and ruled Spain had little nafri dna with Berbers serving as cannon fodder
>>17436596But if you were asking how much Iberian DNA nafri's have, then it's usually up to around 15%, most of this is "recent" as it came from Arab appointed Iberians governing North African holdings for the Moors and the fact of Iberia have multiple times the population of Morocco and Algeria
>>17436578>>17436586>>17436615extremadura has more
>>17436628What am I looking at here? The lower number the higher the admixture?
>>17436638He's cherry picking a badly sourced study that uses a small handful of genetic samples to create a general dna consensus, still doesnt change it's Portugal
>>17436646i'm not cherrypicking anything and the study has a good amount of samples>>17436638extremadura: 5.9% nafri, galicia 5.8%
>>17436659What are the other two sources
>>17436578I’ve heard the argument that Galicians used to launch raids against Muslim areas and take slave women back with them to mix with for centuries but I’m not sure. This would be the reason why
>>17436667it's written there IA iberian and imperial roman
>>17436688Oh.Whats IBS, P value and SE
>>17436688>>17436691And whats Iron Age iberian? Celts/Celtiberians? Roman is what? Italic?
>>17436691IBS means "Iberian populations in Spain", p value is for checking how good the fit is, the higher it is the better, se is the standard errorhere is the study where you can check the details youselfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221003493
>>17436596Depends on where in Iberia
>>17436578>>17436619>But if you were asking how much Iberian DNA nafri's have, then it's usually up to around 15%, most of this is "recent" as it came from Arab appointed Iberians governing North African holdings for the Moors When is people going to realize that the ""northafrican"" in Iberia is the same as the "English" in Denmark, the Finnish in Korea or the "amerindian" in Scandinavia??It is DNA companies MIXING UP groups that some times in the past shared ancestry (without considering the direction of the movement). All that """northafrican""" is NEOLITHIC IBERIAN DNA that crossed to NorthAfrica and now is labeled as """northafrican"" so Iberians get ancient Neolithic DNA named as "northafrican"That is the reason why it is stupid to think that people in the top NW corner of Spain have the highest northafrican when there were NEVER any settlement (not prehistoric not in medieval times with the fake AlAndalus) related to northafricans there. At least the south should have a lot more (after 700 years) but they don´t, so it is fake.Galicians are more isolated and that is why they retain the old components better (old neolithic DNA). Do people realize that Danish people get a 10-15% of "English" DNA?? NO. It is not English, it is old Anglo-Jutes DNA from Denmark to England but DNA companies mix everything up and that is why they say stupidities.
>>17436945It is because the Moors fled to Moortugal and Galicia used to be part of the Moortuguese kingdom.
>>17436990A half nafri wouldnt look like this
>>17436990>>17437003Completely indistinguishable from a moor
>>17436578The spanish were always mulattos. The current breed of new spanish(immigrants from subsaharan africa soon to cross 98% of the population, because having kids isn't fashionable for spanish women anymore) are just returning it to back to what it was. Europe after all ends at Loire.
>>17436578what about Italian? What's their Nafri admixture number?
>>17436578After the War of the Alpujarras, many captive moriscos were sent to the north, to be settled and work the land. And Galicia was their main destination
>>17437043Only Sicilians and Calabrians have it in any significant amount, but still much less than Moorberians. Iberians are literal negro rapebabies.
>>17437077>negro rapebabiesDelusional nafri
>>17437062In the Alpujarras barely 5-10.000 berebers lived. They are tiny villages. They were provisionally sent to certain places in Castilla (some cities) where they were controlled and pointed out. BUT in 1609 ALL of them were taken to the ports of Valencia and were also kicked out. They were not trustable. All of those that were sent to Castilla (a few thousands) were kicked out.Any single day Spain is receiving more muslims (3000 last week) than what the Revuelta de las Alpujarras did. There are more muslims in Paris alone today than in the whole 700 years of all muslims in Iberia combined. Probably x50 more.
The new argument of the contrarian is denying the deportation of moors and moriscos by saying it was only a few people and that most moors joined christianity in the reconquered territories before the fall of Grenada.I found zero evidences of it, on the other side I found evidences that Moors from other parts basically joined the emirate of Grenada.where are these famous evidences of Mudejars converting to christianity before the end of reconquista? I do not find it anywhere.This phenomenon exist for Jews who started to convert before the end of reconquista but it has happened because of some traumatic pogrom.
Most moors were kicked out in 1492. Just a few of them (probably no more than 5-10.000 stayed in Alpujarras (Granada). Since they revolted they were dispersed to certain cities in Castilla. Since they did not integrate (they were crypto muslims) they were kicked out between 1609-1612 through the ports of Valencia as this picture represents (there are dozens of contemporary pictures of this events).No muslim converted to christianity. Only some jews did.
>>17437120Not him but all iberians have negroid autosomal admixture
The most recent and comprehensive genomic studies establish that North African genetic ancestry can be identified throughout most of the Iberian Peninsula, ranging from 0% to 12%, but is highest in the south and west, while being absent or almost absent in the Basque Country and northeast.[66][18][19] Hernandez et al. (2020) identified 11.17±1.87% North African ancestry in southern Portuguese samples (from a population similar to modern northern Moroccans and Algerians), 9.28±1.79% of such ancestry in western Andalusians, and an average of 1.41±0.72% sub-Saharan ancestry in southern Iberians (using Yoruba as a proxy source).[54] Lazarids et al. (2014) detected 12.6±2% North African ancestry and an average of 1.5±0.2% sub-Saharan ancestry in the Spanish population.[67]
>>17438275name of the papers?
>>17436990>>17438275Seethe you faggot. Iberians cluster with all other Europeans. Feels good to be white.
>>17438505his 3:30 am, get a life, Toni
>>17438505iberians were originally basque like. Also, you can still be Euro w/ minor admixture.
