>the west started the cold war. The ussr imposing its form of government onto eastern europe was a response to western actionsDo retards really believe this crap?
>>17437961Yes, especially the faculty of the University of Wisconsin-Madison during the CW.
>>17437961I mean to be fair the west did intervene in the Russian civil war on the side of the white army and there were tons of generals like Patton who wanted to destroy the Soviet Union while WW2 was still going on.
>>17438073Besides the japanese They were mostly just sitting at ports guarding weapons storages and watching the battle from afar.Also the reds started the civil war by being cunts against the Czech legion
>>17438233>""""""""""""""czech""""""""""""" legion>in russia for """"""""""""""no reason"""""""""(shut up we did not make it off with their gold)The Eternal Bohemian Strikes Again.
>>17438277Stalin made off with Spain's gold so it all worked out in the end.
>>17437961>The ussr imposing its form of government onto eastern europe was a response to western actionsBetter than that, they gained these territories by might, right after having fought in the greatest war in history with unprecedented loss of life, and many eastern Europeans fought besides the fascist Reich in its mission of annihilation of the Russian people. Imperialists in London and Washington giving moral lessons about Soviet "imperialism" will always not be funny
>>17438696Lmao, they would have gotten rolled over without support from the "imperialists". Soviet "might" without outside help can be seen in battles like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bia%C5%82ystok%E2%80%93Minsk
>>17437961>the soviet union should have defacto given the westerners eastern europe because erm... they just should have!
>>17438804And how did the battle of France go, anon?
