A hardened knight, having fought battles a hundred times over on horse in on horse lance and trusted knightly sword, and having taken a pilgrimage to attend mass in Rome, has found cause to challenge a local nobleman to a duel. In response, the nobleman requests a duel with blades only and no armor, to first blood. He also calls upon an ally to fight in his stead. The man is said to be a fighter from Florence, and wields a thin and long blade he has never seen before, and is he holding his cloak in his other hand?Who is likely to win such a fight
>>17438418Rapiers are self-defense weapons.The Knight already fought against spears, estoc, and halbergs this is a sissy fight
>>17438418The Rapist obviously. The knight never fought against rapiers before and reach is king in an unarmored duel.Also i feel like if he fought over a hundred battles he would outright be maimed or limp.
>>17438418>to first bloodThe knight loses in one pass.
