Is it time to bring back monarchies?
>>17438589There was never a time to get rid of them
>>17438589Why?
yes. but monarchy alone to get brought back as a national symbol is imperfect.we need the surrounding nobles as well from the military fields (including military medicine and weaponry development), so that their culture would be sustained with much involved population.
14 year old ahhh post
Fuck no. I would rather my tax money going towards state funded things than towards a king to live a lavish lifestyle
Did King Charles get deposed?
>>17438607Because it's a larp. People imagine their lives would be better with a king in charge. Until that king decides to fuck them over then it's "what the hell we need a system with checks and balances on power where people choose the sovereign!"
>>17438636Your taxes already go to cretinous “democratically elected representatives” so they can live a lavish lifestyle. I’d rather have it at least go to a Christian monarch.
>>17438636Your taxes already go to cretinous “democratically elected representatives” so they can live a lavish lifestyle. I’d rather have it at least go to a Hellenist monarch.
>>17438697Monarchies ironically have better checks and balances than republics because if he fucks up everyone knows who to blame, whereas democracies can operate as a hydra of corruption where someone else can always take the fall while the deep state continues to pull the strings. Ten corrupt people can operate much better than one tyrant. Also,>people choose the sovereignImagine wanting this.
>>17438589only if we agree the mandate of heaven is a better idea than the divine right of kings. otherwise get fucked retard.
We need recall for every politician after 6 months in power for first timers and 1 year in power for second+ timers. Direct democracy, people don't trust you anymore? Out.
Nothing wrong with monarchies but christcuck monarchist is utterly braindead and as long as Christianity exist everything is garbage.btw the Kingdom of Spain is more secular than the American and Italian Republics.
this >>17438712modern materialist ideologies are so vacuous and meaningless, apparently the most pressing concern in society is trans rights, BLM and covering up crime rates to promote "diversity"
>>17438910Most christians are brown and black
>>17438697>Until that king decides to fuck them overKill him and get a new one. Can't do that in democracies because the power is divided between hundreds of politicians.
>>17438832That's fucking bullshit, historically divine right of kings meant that any questioning of the kings rule was a statement that God himself had fucked up by letting him get near the throne. People will just blame literally everyone around the king for 'giving him bad advice/counsel' (and not the mentally ill manchild wearing a crown)
>>17439008>Kill him and get a new one.Which entails years of civil war. There's a reason we did away with absolute monarchs.
>>17438589Yes. Most men are too stupid for politics, which is precisely why democracy was imposed on us. Control without the appearance of control is the greatest trick of all.
>>17439032>Which entails years of civil warBetter years of civil war than a century of a cabal having absolute control over your country.
>>17438589The United States and Russia are monarchies and look how well they are doing.
>>17439120China too.
>>17439085>cabal ruling my country: : />cabal (related by blood) ruling my country: : O
>>17438832>hydra of corruption where someone else can always take the fall while the deep state continues to pull the stringsLike a royal court of scheming nobles and advisors.
>>17439160Most modern oligarchs today inherited their status. They just wear suits instead of robes.It's all about aesthetics.
>>17439021>>17439203I personally believe in enlightened absolutism. Even Arab Monarchies are a better model than Western Democracy.
>>17438589do you trust the monarch? because I don't, one bithierarchical assembly direct democracy, I say
>>17439160>cabal (related by blood) ruling my country: : O
>>17439160>cabal ruling my country: : /
>>17439346>Government: Unitary parliamentary republic (1875–1940)
>>17439348>Government: Unitary semi-presidential constitutional republic
>>17439349>>17439352Nevermind how volatile the Third Republic was and all the violent protests and strikes there, or the monarchy before that.It's all about aesthetics and monarchists would gladly live in a state with more pretty buildings and less human rights.
>>17439349>>17439352>voters in 1902>>17439346>voters in 2025>>17439348
>>17439386>NOOO NO ONE HAS EVER LIVED IN A HIGH TRUST LOW CRIME COMMUNITYif they could see the future they'd all unite
>>17439386It's not even that. It's christcuck larping as THE TRVE TRAD CHRISTIAN WEST™
Look at the history of the British monarchy. Full of mentally ill psychopaths. Why should one family rule all others? You desire to be ruled is very telling, have some fucking independence you poofta
>>17439388>>17439400You remind me of people who view the entirety of interwar German history as being the red-light district of Berlin everywhere at all times.
>>17438589Yes
>>17439418>Noooo, you don't understand! This tiny Upper Bavarian village of 79 people is as degenerate as the brothels in Berlin!
>>17438589You couldn't even if you tried, people have too many rights and technology has advanced too much, you could only impose a China-type dictatorship.
>ugggghghhhhh I NEED to see some rich ponce faggot in a fancy outfit...UUUGGGGGHHHyou are a homosexual
>>17439537>ugggghghhhhh I NEED to see some rich ponce faggotEvery ruler is rich, retard.>in a fancy outfitWe can change the outfits to something more modern.
>>17439085How many wars have you fought in anonEveryone's a fucking tough guy in their heads, but when the situation gets bad they always wish there was an easier wayCivil wars to change leaders would absolutely suck
>>17439085It would be exactly the same as trying to overthrow the cabal that rules the country now anon.You ain't revolting now and you wouldn't revolt against an unlawful king.
>>17439549>nooooo the moanrch would magically be based and talented and would agree with all my views and would make sure they are imposed and that society would run the way I specifically like ityou are a retard
>>17439625He would be raised and educated since birth to be a good ruler, yes.Or you think that whatever dumbfuck being able to rise to power if he tricks enough idiots to vote for him is a better system?
>>17438832>Monarchies ironically have better checks and balances than republicsHow are you operationalizing that?
>>17438832Everytime the lower classes rebel against their kings you people condemn them as part of some judeo-masonic conspiracy.
The Kings of Britain, Spain, Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Norway haven't lifted a finger to prevent their countries form turning into this: >>17439348 >>17439400If that doesn't condemn monarchy, I don't know what does.
>>17439664What do you want them to do? None of them have barely any power left because republicans have taken it all away from them.
>>17439679The very least they could do is voice their opinions, actively criticize their governments, refuse to recognize new ones they don't like, rally the people around them.And if no one were to listen to them, or even care if they were to be removed from their positions, that'd be just another nail into the coffin for monarchy
>>17439702>he thinks monarchs care enough about their people to do the bare minimum
>>17439702>The very least they could do is voice their opinions, actively criticize their governments, refuse to recognize new ones they don't like, rally the people around them.Even that alone would probably be enough to make the uppity peasants throw a fit. They're all one step away from outright abolishing the monarchy.
>>17439714Sounds to me like people don't want kings then.
>>17439718The people are retards and don't know what's good for them.
>>17439723But you do.
>>17439727On the matter of governance, yes.
>>17439702What does a peasant know about geopolitics? We need a feudal system, peasants have a say in how the sheep are shepherded and the best season to trim the hedgerows, the local pastor, merchant and gentry discuss trade and local ordinances, the barons, mayors and bishops debate taxes and law, the king, dukes and archbishops handle diplomacy, war and policy.
>>17438589Wow, how controversial. Never heard that before on this website. Surely you didn't just get an aesthetic attachment to monarchies from playing Paradox games?
>>17439731Maybe you should be a monarch then.
>>17438715/thread
>>17438589Considering how the British monarchy seems to be deliberately trying to destroy the British people I doubt that's a great idea.
>>17440596Then overthrow the monarchy and install Sargon of Akkad as the new English King.
>>17438715>I’d ratherWhat you want doesn't matter.Know your place.
Notice how he said that to you >>17438715 but not >>17438712
>>17438832thisalso look at bell curvea 100iq ain't much imo and half the population is bellow thatit divides the people and makes them feel responsible for living under tyranny(just voote harder)the psychological effect of those 4 years cycles also takes it toll, it kind of makes people legit insane
Government.. for the people. Of the people. By the people.But the people are retarded.
>>17439706they do thougha strong people is a strong kingdomno dying for isreal here, and just fuck around and find out, when it comes to foreign occupationand it becomes about protecting and promoting the good life, instead of the forever growth of the 1%
>>17439535Even then China is struggling to keep that since the younger generations don't think exactly as they do.
>>17439627If every ruler is raised and educated since birth to be a good ruler, then why is every ruler not a good ruler?
>>17440814And now that the Western Zoomers have uploaded data into the Chinese zoomers.. China revolution soon.
>>17439723You are part of those "people" and I deem you a retard.
>>17440817You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.You can teach a kid in the best way possibly, with the best tutors. The kid can still end up a fucking retard. >t. Crusader Kings enjoyer
>>17440802>no dying for isreal here?????????? and what makes you think a monarchy would somehow prevent a US/israel foreign policy scenario? if anything, a king with absolute power would make it EASIER for them to conscript you and send you off to war or else you get sent to prison and there's NOTHING you can do about it because you have 0 civil protections.you monarchy incels are so fucking painfully and insufferably retarded.