[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2436.jpg (326 KB, 1179x1640)
326 KB
326 KB JPG
Did any group in history have better drip than the Puritans?
>>
>>18379423
>no belt buckle on his hat
no drip at all
>>
It's all downhill after 1648
>>
File: IMG_1886.jpg (44 KB, 250x415)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>>18379423
18th century noblemen. Puritans are just boring post great male renunciation fashion before it was cool.
>>
>Not going out to battle covered in a mosaic of iridescent, color changing feathers
>>
Puritans were famously anti-"drip." That was basically as sober as it was possible to look in the early 17th century.
>>
>>18379423
I'm quite a fan of traditional west slavic fashion. Puritan men look pretty cool but their women's fashion wasn't that great.

>>18379790
>fursuits
okay bud, back to >>>/trash/ with you

>>18379805
>Puritans were famously anti-"drip."
Very true. You were only permitted to dress in "sadd colours" which were colours that the puritans themselves considered to be ugly and not attention grabbing.
>>
File: alexander dumas.jpg (318 KB, 1320x2000)
318 KB
318 KB JPG
>>18379423
1820s romantic male fashion
alexander dumas is /fa/ af
>>
File: HC6N55tWEAAui2p.jpg (151 KB, 1557x756)
151 KB
151 KB JPG
16th century portuguese drip
>>
File: feather mosaic redownload.jpg (2.71 MB, 2112x1712)
2.71 MB
2.71 MB JPG
>>18379838
When the fursuits are made like this they get a pass
>>
>>18379636
fpbp
>>
>>18379845
>/fa/ af
fat african, yes
>>
>>18379423
Yes. The Puritans were drippy, but not compared to the Landsknechts, Hussars (especially Polish Winged Hussars), Renaissance Florence and Venice, the Samurai, and the French Court under Louis XIV at Palace of Versailles. So yeah, the Puritans were great, but far from the drippiest.
>>
>>18379423


IS THAT REALLY YOUR IDEA OF PERFECT FASHION?
>>
>>18379790
lmao what
>>
>>18380112
What part of the image are you "what"ing at?
>>
>>18379959
Ottoman janissaries also had drip
>>
>>18379959
>Landsknechts
The best looking soldiers of the european peninsula
>>
>>18379643
I like Landsknechte too but their distinct fashion was already gone by the end of the 16th century - so long before the 30 Years War started.
>>18379636
Those "hat buckles" were an invention of the 19th century.
>>18379873
How were the feathers sourced? Did they really catch and kill thousands of small birds to have material for one or two pieces?
>>
Non Puritan Elizabethan, Jacobean and Restoration /fa/, the kind of foppish excess they were rebelling again, was far better.
>>
>>18380245
I haven't come across publications which talk about how feathers were physically collected, but there are some about it more in terms of which species of birds were used from which parts of Mexico, especially based on the study of some surviving Aztec shields by Dr. Nadal

Here:

- Various publications by Dr. Laura Filoy Nadal (EX: Sept-Oct 2019 Arqueología Mexicana issue, anything on her http://academia.edu, researchgate, book chapters she's published like "Feathered Objects in the Codex Mendoza and Their Extant Representatives", and so on)
- journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/1447
- vistasgallery.ace.fordham.edu/items/show/1721
- vistasgallery.ace.fordham.edu/items/show/1722
- youtube.com/watch?v=NgUw8JEnb5U
- Youtube.com/watch?v=BwvxzXv=BwvxzXv=BwvxzXv=BwvxzX7S1iM
- Youtube.com/watch?v=DO9_lfv=DO9_lfv=DO9_lfv=DO9_lfrxLes
- arqueologiamexicana.mx/mexico-antiguo/el-cuexyo-chimalli-del-castillo-de-chapultepec
- arqueologiamexicana.mx/mexico-antiguo/las-plumas-del-cuexyo-chimalli
- arqueologiamexicana.mx/mexico-antiguo/chimalli-escudos-mexicas-emplumados
- noticonquista.unam.mx/amoxtli/2860/2860
- americae.fr/en/special-section/technologies-en/cadenas-operatorias-production-objetos-emplumados-mexicas/
- https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6148cc814957ab5ff0e98e85/t/619565a4f79a303b0d3c80fb/1637180838659/FILLOY+-+CUEXYO+CHIMALLI.pdf
- nahuatl.historicas.unam.mx/index.php/ecn/article/download/9337/8715/9121

To try to answer your question directly though, Spanish descriptions of markets mention animals being sold both dead or alive, including birds, so presumbly some of the feathers were sourced from killed birds, yes. Though Diaz in his description of the royal Aviary in Tenochtitlan states that feathers were plucked from the birds in such a way/at the right time so that it didn't injure the birds and they would grow back. I would assume that naturally shedded feathers were also collected
>>
>>18379423
They looked good but tons of other cultures dressed better. Puritans did have among the best costumes of their time tho.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.