Post artists/drawings you find have great anatomy/skill to study and share methods of drawing anatomy in perspective
>>7080052man I remember that thread... how many years has it been?
>>7080056do you have a warosu link?
>>7080097It may have been during the time warosu was down. 2 or 3 years ago. Lots of redliners came to play that day.
>>7080127too bad
>>7080052But why? That picture is awful. It doesn't "read" as a human body. Even if it is technically, optically correct, it looks wrong, and that's what matters. I will never understand this board's obsession with violent perspective distortion, as if some perceived "difficulty level" is what gives a work of art its value.Anyway, if you want to see difficult foreshortening done well, check out Michelangelo's Last Judgement, or some of the engravings by Hendrick Goltzius.
>>7080160kek. looks like a bag of walnuts or bunches of radishes.
>>7080166Maybe so (this is actually one of the less egregious examples of Goltzius "walnuts anatomy") but nonetheless the foreshortening is effective and it you can tell even in thumbnail that it's a human figure seen from above.
>>7080097>>7080127https://warosu.org/ic/thread/6205206that sure was difficult to findliterally three clicks
>>7080052abandon realitytake the hogarthpill
>>7080177thanks. 3 clicks? teach me. reverse search/saucenow didn't link to warosu.
>>7080167I'm thinking it's seen from under and behind him
>>7080185bruhopen this thread in the current warosu ic catalog and click on view same
which animu artists draw cool poses like that
>>7080052>>7080177I remember this
>>7080052holy kekwhat are some more hilarious examples of turd polishing?
>>7080052
>>7080227kek
>>7080052pose 3d model. pose it and adjust light and camera. trace. WOW AMAZING NIPPON JEAN S
>>7080052>https://warosu.org/ic/thread/6205206>that sure was difficult to findI like the mouth and I'll use it as a reference.
Dynamic poses are such a paradoxOn one hand, dynamic poses showcases an artist's skillOn another, it turns off viewers precisely because it look strange and weirdThe views that these poses gain does not justify the difficulty of making themThe only time Dynamic poses are welcomed is during action sequences. Dynamic poses are welcomed because it produces slick angles but even then, do it too much and it becomes dizzying
>>7080178HOGARTH IS MY ART DAD
How do you learn to use perspective and do dynamic pics like this? Loomis doesn't teach that.>>7080204Garrett hanna does cool poses like that
>>7081520>Loomis doesn't teach that.He kind of does, he goes over camera lenses and distortion briefly. It takes non-retard IQ to truly understand his books.
>>7080160
>>7081520Experimenting
>>7081437A pose can be dynamic without crazy foreshortening and bodily contortions.Drawings like these are just about doing difficult shit for the sake of doing difficult shit. And as >>7080160 states often without regard for readability or aesthetic appeal. Though perhaps as you get better it might be helpful doing a few of these if only to challenge and to prove yourself.
>>7081520Garrett has such a great sense of composition along with anatomy/perspectiveReally solid skills, will be studying, thanks Anon
>>7081540Another great artist is Toriyama, no extreme perspective but still clearly convey's depth
loomistards will never understand
>>7081525>he goes over camera lenses and distortionwhich book?
>>7081562I made it up
>>7081546How does he do it?
>>7081546Toriyama is THE best when it comes to action scenes with dynamic poses. Goku vs Piccolo Jr is peak DB.
>>7081710Stop pretending to be me fag.>>7081562I'm just saying that he does mention it, he doesn't tell you how to use it in the way you want but that's how art books are. They give you concepts of things and then it's up to you to run with it. This requires mid-/int/ level at the minimum.
>>7080056>>7080127>sfvi Juri??? its been less than one
>>7081437>Dynamic poses are such a paradox>turns off viewers???
>>7081554Based bad faith poster.
>trace a model>people redline your anatomyyou can't win
>>7082397Source picture then?
>>7081520>How do you learn to use perspective and do dynamic pics like this? Loomis doesn't teach that.tell me you never read a single loomis book without telling me you never read a single loomis
>>7081520Damn anon you got mogged>>7083298by the weakest loomis enjoyer
>>7083298>>7083313>dunning krugers can't into obliques
>>7083324>"dunning krugers">Can't write a coherent sentenceanon...
>>7085425>he's a newfag toooh nononono
>>7085457explain yourself oldfag
>>7085469lurk moar beggie
>>7085508wtf does "can'tintoobliques" mean?
>>7085555you'd know if you had learned perspective, you dunning kruger
>>7085564>can'tintoobliquesPYW also explain my nigga EXPLAIN enlighten me oh wise one this is your chance to flex your oldhead knowledge
>>7085596I'm not rewarding a dk for memeing like a retarded faggot lmaofuck off to your containment threadlast reply, apply yourself
>>7085600>doesn't actually know anything>making shit up to sound smartok oldfag i see how it is
>>7081437Just because a pose is dynamic doens't make it appealing or inherently good.There are objectively bad dynamic poses as there are objectively bad standing/idling poses.Just because you picked a pose with lots of movement, you didn't win the pose picking phase and aren't entitled to praise for your dynamic pose pick.Pick better poses.
>>7085856mad city
>>7081546Rip to the GOAT
>>7085555Well I dunno
>>7094522Between the sheets.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNDb8qKZEX8
>>7081554if it looks cool, fuck it
>>7081554you do realize you can actually make the camera have that fish eye lens, you don't have to actually stretch the 3d model
>>7081520Hogarth
>>7080052He made her calf muscle way too thicc, bitch got two thighs on one leg.
>>7080052it looks like she has no kneejust straight calf connecting to a deformed attempt at a thigh which connects to the hip
>>7102381source?
>>7102892and people still haven't figured it out
>>7102892>>7104669She does. It's just facing forward while her foot is facing 90 degrees away from it. The problem is the bottom leg being broken.
>>7080052It looks like we see that we shouldn't see at this angle. Instinctively I'd move the leg a little to the right
Ogure Ito is one of my favs when it comes to this kind of stuff
>>7083298>thinking that diagram has fuckall to do with what he's talking about That's drawing basic figures in realistic perspective. He's talking about making exaggerated "comic perspective" drawings in a way which still look believable. As in, if you were to extrapolate a 3D model from the drawing and look at it from a different angle, it would look all fucked up despite appearing correct in the drawing. Like the what 3D animators sometimes do to the 3D model to get the shot they want - as in pic.
>>7107177>>7107155>>7081554>get a grasp of basic perspective and figure drawing>study photos with lens distortion/fisheye>study 5 point perspective>learn to push your gestures to the extreme without being afraid if the proportions are correct>copy other artists who've done these types of drawings >wing itThe reality is there's no technical way of doing this correctly, because it is inherently incorrect. It's like looking at a flat, graphical Total Drama Island character and trying to draw their head using traditional Loomis construction. You just need to get a feel for it and a sense of when what you're doing looks good and when it doesn't.
>>7107155Reminds me a bit of this action shot from Bouncer I really like
>>7107155>>7107359the moment someone gets confused while trying to follow your work, you fucked up.
>>7107155brooo air gear that's a blast from the 2000s past
>>7102381Is that last pose actually possible? Feels like the balance is off.
>>7110712ah yes, i see that you know your judo well
>>7113188>>7107197>>7107155EVERYBODY WAS KUNG-FU FIGHTINGhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiznIkHQ9sQ
Nobody STILL can’t refute this juri
>>7080258>>7114813Kinda true looking at this anatomy
it's just a super leg
>>7116770SUPER DUPER LEG
>>7118213Never skip leg day
super duper sumos
>>7119540which is it
>>7119540SO MUCH FOR YOUR PROMISES
>>7114917nobody
>>7123612I don't understand this post
>>7119540the feet are wrong. such a simple mistake
>>7080052bros I wanna cum deep inside juri's pussy if you know what I'm trying to say
>>7127024i don't
>>7127024we just gotta refute the drawing
coomerbait
>>7080052the problem here is not the anatomy but the fat distributionthose are the legs of a 200 kg personand the left boob is double the size than the right boob
>>7080052>ITT: begs too stupid to know where they belong
>>7119540You could probably skip a few days of rimlighting here and there.
>>7110712It's how I draw
I think I'm done. I don't want to measure and calculate and study anatomy. Any time I want to draw, I come up with something and think "this is going to take me hours of pure pain and torture to construct" and I just don't want to subject myself to that. Its like realizing one day that your job sucks and you just walk out. I just lost all desire to draw because I I'm tired. I'm tired of constructing and learning.
>>7130045I’m gone and I’m finishedAnd I ain’t seen my friends in a
>>7080258It's baffling that someone could do this without 3D models
>>7131448Yeah well…
>>7131448It’s crazy.
Still can’t be refuted
>>7136529true
>>7103288Click the little arrow next to the post number;image search >> saucenao
>>7080160Humans dont look like they are made of pop up balls
>>7080052the visual clarity here sucks ass
>>7139255You must be fun at parties
>>7080160It looks like that hatching on dollar bills.What's the name of this style?
