Most male art ref packs are either regular Joes or ENORMOUS BEEFCAKES, hard to find packs with a variety of body types. Also not much "artistic" stuff out there with big ol' salami swords.
This guy looks like he has a nice meat tomahawk.
male models are fucking cowards, they all use underwear. i wanna see bare asses and cock veins, otherwise there's no point, same with women models desu.
I realize one can find male nudes with great big members pretty much anywhere else, but I'm wondering if there are art models, actual artistic poses. But if anyone feels like sharing any kind of anything here that's fine too, there isn't another pose ref thread at the moment.
>>7195722where can I get porno sex ref pack with various angles and uncensored genitalia???
>>7195734No kidding, Grafit has an avalanche of references, male and female, but half the male models wear undies.
>>7195736>with great big membersWhy? It makes no difference when drawing.
>>7195740I wanna draw big aesthetic thunderschlongs. Big, I can find. Artistically interesting, that's more difficult.
>>7195723not good enough, its not hanging down to the floor and thicker than his forearm
>>7195750You're right. We need "Well-Endowed Man Balancing on His Dick" reference pack. Cock yoga.
>>7195722where is the link to this
>>7195723>>7195727>>7195734>>7195736>>7195738>>7195740>>7195747>>7195752KYS SAGE AND HIDE
>>7195789Satine Zillah website
>>7195824Nah fuck you im going to draw these tonight.
>>7195722>>7195734>>7195736You are not wrong. I wish there was more long and slender men to fit men in general doing artistic posts and what not, you would think it would be everywhere but I stand correctly sadly.
>>7195722Search for solo gay porn
>>7195722Can someone upload that pack? Its hard to find male modes. I wrote a script that deleted every second female ref and they are still 80% of my folder.
The light in these shoots is always so awful, it's not useful for artists, it's not made by artists either. Even old photos of Arnie are better.
>>7197189true. the crux of the issue is that most male nude models are made for porn so they just don't give a shit. Women models at least get nice lighting because they're meant to be drawn and referenced. It's way more academic. You'd have more luck finding a muscular female model pack than an academic nude male model.
>>7197189How can you tell if lighting is good or not?
>>7197938If you're working to do some gestural stuff or get the gist of a figure, then lighting isn't too important. But if you're filling in the shadows and highlights and all that jazz, it's important to have lighting that accentuates all the funky dips and rises of muscle and flesh. If the lighting leaves everything all grey and flat, it might not be so helpful.
>>7195747how big we talking anon-kun?
>>7197938I can't tell any muscle definition in these artstation ref packs, the images are always so dark.
>>7195722Looks like he got his ass kicked and flattened
>>7198004The lights are shit, I mean you can see that the guy has muscles but not the shadows, for my ArtStation it became an OnlyFans camouflage with these packages, especially the female models.
>>7198004> Owns an art program> Doesn't know how to tweak valuesAsk yourself what the fuck you're even doing with your life
>>7198415Not the same thing, that's resorting to polishing a turd. You want hard shadows like the vintage black and white photos.
Even muscle shows on youtube are better than anything on Artstation.
>>7198004Here I leave you this is a book by Arnold with many black and white photos of bodybuilders.>https://gofile.io/d/eF77Is
>>7198546Nice, thanks! This is the stuff the old masters referenced, you can bet Ryoichi Ikegami and Richard Corben copied this.
>>7198415The problem is that studio photographers are used to setting up these 4+ direction lighting setups to blast the models from every direction which makes it impossble to read a legible shadow from the reference.>>7198004 is fucking awful, if you try to sketch such a confusing lighting setup (a flourescent tube on the floor?) it will look like nonsense unless you nail it perfectly and also render the environment so the viewer understands there is a light source on the floor and you aren't just randomly making the leg super bright because you are a retard.
lack of appreciation for the male form is why modern art will never reach the old masters height btw
>>7195736sauceill buy idc just post sauce
>>7195736sauce pls
>>7199504>>7199890Satine Zillah
>>7199893thank you
>New Masters Academy reference images (4.14 GB)aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWdhLm56L2ZvbGRlci81MzhWMllaYSNHajlnMVR3SWdhUjNRV3pKWHFHSHZn
>>7200286Marvelous collection, thank you for sharing!
>>7198004>dutch angle>3 light sources>1/3 of the picture is dead spacecant wait to draw this ref
>>7195722Funny timing. Just a few days ago I was looking for ref packs and getting annoyed that it was all women. I wish there were Super Pose Books for men or something. >>7198546>>7200286Based, thanks for these.
>>7195723>>7195722Is there a link for these? I really like the poses he's doing. Also, you can see almost everything on him!
>>7195862god I can't fuckin find it, she has so many. Someone pls spoonfeed link to this one.>>7195824fag>>7199504>>7199890I think this is it: https://www.artstation.com/marketplace/p/pkqoG/couple-vol-3-photo-reference-pack-for-artists-496-jpegs>>7198004>>7198410>>7198723>The problem is that studio photographers are used to setting up these 4+ direction lighting setups to blast the models from every direction which makes it impossble to read a legible shadow from the reference.Yeah, Posespace is better for this, but holy fuck it's expensive. The artstation packs aren't terrible if you're trying to do a constructive approach though, picrel is from an artstation pack.
>>7200286>>7200354where do I use that with? is it mega?
>>7204392Base64
>>7204396thank you anon
Some random muscle head on youtube provides better light than a professional Artstation studio.
>>7204504the traveling pharmacy
>>7195722Study gay porn like the dr stone mangaka did
>>7204504Hmm why does it seem like everything from rando youtube videos to old ass magazines to porn has better lighting than professional art studios
>>7204504god i'd hate to be this veiny disgusting mess of a teenager
>>7204504*heavy breathing intensifies
>>7198723Gonna draw Ubel from this reference. Thank you anon
>>7198546Yooooooo
>>7205292Juicing, dude is wheezing all over his vids. Poor kids gonna die soon if he doesn’t stop fucking his body up.
>>7204504You're retarded if you use this abomination as reference.
>>7205319I did for the torso and it turned out great.
are there any packs of men with 360 turn-arounds? seems like all the men packs are just "BIG HERO FIGHT FIGHT POSES XTREEM CAMERA ANGLE".I'm about to drop $50 on a couple posespace packs but I would much rather get an artstation pack if one like that exists.
>Male Anatomy for Artists (3D.SK) (17.7 GB)aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWdhLm56L2ZvbGRlci9ZN0Z5blJJQSM2WHd1TnF5OUdzVHpWa3J5WWlVZnZR>Female Anatomy for Artists (3D.SK) (17.15 GB)aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWdhLm56L2ZvbGRlci92WkVGRmJJQSNxaTBObnpGT2JSQjVEM3Q3eEFONVZB
>>7205264Yeah, I'm sure you're much happier with whatever dead end path your life has taken.
>>7198723>>7205278
Ayone have this?
REference, jap bond edition?
>>7206860
>>7206861
>>7206860dd
>>7206864
>>7206866
>>7207068No matter how broken ur heart is it will still be miles healthier than the one this moron has.
>>7207065I don't give two fucks about the guy. He's doing what he wants and you think anyone cares that you think he looks stupid. Get over yourself.
>>7207059probably the dildo up her censored puss
>>7207440
>>7207463
>>7197938the subject in that photo gives you the impression of the basic 3D shade ball.the shadow and highlight is what giving your 2D flat drawing the 3D effect, regardless on how you render it. Correct lighting for study is necessary as a beginner to understand before you can be creative about it.
>>7207061MEGA Desktop App (requires an account).Log in -> Right click -> Transfer Manager -> Open links -> Download to my computer (uncheck Import to my Cloud drive) -> OKThe download keeps the file structure and some of the filenames are quite long so keep the path of the download folder short.
>>7195722I hope the dick is intact, not cut. https://www.satinezillah.com/photoreferences/p/maleact
>>7207488They already uploaded that homosexual in other threads
>>7207488
>>7208007Do you have any of the packs anon? Can you upload them?
I can't stop laughing, you guys masturbate with these kinds of micro dicks
>>7209196You love them big dicks, ain't ya?... heh
>>7209218I understand that homosexuals like big cocks, you don't have to be one to know that, anyway, anon, I understand your insinuation, but I'm not interested.
>>7209196>masturbateOnly loser like (You) jerk of to art material.
>>7209287>Only loser like (You) jerk of to art materialI hurt your vagina??? I don't care
>>7209196damn it, so many steroids literally castrated him
>>7200286Women are so much more beautiful than men it's embarrassing. Nudity should be left to them.>inb4 fattynah
>>7206860sauce?
>caring that much about other peoplewhy are you on this board?
>>7209893nah bro that's natty, you are just a DYEL fr
>>7211574They cut off his cock and you say he's elegant? cuckold!!!
>>7211212Women are designed to sell beauty. Men are designed to go out and procure so they can buy it. You're comparing apples and an apple cart
>>7208003which thread? I can't find it on archive
>>7211212>women>more beautiful than menkek. women needs makeup to make them resembles human on daily basis but men? just be himself and work out to FLESH OUT the potential in him. it's in nature
>>7208007P-POST PACKS...N-NOW!
>>7195722Any kinda twinky packs available?
>>7212765I think you may just be a faggot
>>7206860Kek. Female pose packs are just straight up porn/onlyfans
>nobody posting packs
>>7213721It's over...
>>7213580Nope, I can tolerate little girls and absolutely hate women after the age of 13.
>>7213832Pedo or not you still a fag.
>>7211229JApan obviously
Anyways to bring this thread back on track here is a pack of this guy >>7208007https://wetransfer.com/downloads/93d59b2c09397165b0b32c78a5560f4820240627195114/743cb6
Does anyone have a reference pack of mostly nude men and women wearing underwear? So shorts/briefs on men and panties/bras on women. I don't want to look at penis or pussy or tits, thank you very much.
>>7214029Blerrggh why w*men are so ugly? No wonder they're considered the things that are non-human.
>>7214067>https://wetransfer.com/downloads/93d59b2c09397165b0b32c78a5560f4820240627195114/743cb6w-whew I can't stop touching myse-- I mean, drawing his figures!. Thanks anon!
mm
Bros I'm looking for fat female models
does anyone have this pack?https://grafitschool.gumroad.com/l/xKXIF
bump
>>7214067reup please
I need pose packs of beautiful men. Any recommendations?
>>7215838https://gofile.io/d/ImsZ1f
>>7218073Thank you!
I bought these two last night, anyone want them.Also do I need to scrub any digital watermarks for art station packs or can I just upload.
any recommendations for drapery packs? preferably shirts/hoodies/pants
>>7204392If you're using firefox you can also use this addon to decode base 64 on page:https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/base64-decoder/
>>7219216yes plz
>>7219216I don't think Grafit Studio itself puts watermarks on their releases. Bizarrely it's the Telegram group that rips some of Pose reference that puts his name and Address (he lives in India) in some pictures.
>>7219775>>7219782Give me a few days, vacation soon I can get to it.
>>7208007>>7209196Anyone got these packs?
>>7195740The artist is gay or female
>>7195722So does anybody have the pack in the OP or is everyone too busy acting gay?
Any of these will be appreciated. :DDhttps://www.satinezillah.com/photoreferences/p/maleacthttps://www.satinezillah.com/photoreferences/p/anatomyofamanhttps://www.satinezillah.com/photoreferences/p/musclestudyhttps://www.satinezillah.com/photoreferences/p/figurestudyhttps://www.satinezillah.com/photoreferences/p/adonis
>>7220254nah
>>7220254it's on cgp
>>7220254this is not on CGP
>>7220782I don't have an account.
>>7195736Bump for more like this.
>>7220786yes it is
