Hi /ic/,Reddit here.Considering buying some affordable art, and need some honest feedback on how shit my taste is. Some have already sold, but generally speaking, how bad is it?5 paintings/drawings, and one photograph print.If it's really shit, tell me why it's shit.
>>7220634
>>72206343
>>72206344
>>72206345
>>72206346
>>72206347 and done. What say you?
>>7220634COOL THREAD anon. To be honest, I don't like any of the ones you posted. I guess it is a matter of personal taste.I also have a dream to collect real art some day. I would like to have a collection of just graphite drawings from my favorite artists. Imagine having a Claire Wendling original. Stuff like that. It's a fucking tragedy that I could not have the chance to get a signed book from Kim Jun Gi.
>posts 7 AI imagesGo back.
>>7220673google them all they link back to where they are for sale
>>7220636>>7220639>>7220643These are bad. The rest are good.>>7220641This one is amazing
>>7220712interesting you liked the others but not >>7220639
>>7220635>>7220638>>7220639These are beg tier trash.>>7220636>>7220641>>7220643These are quite nice.
>>7220821fair enough
>>7220634>>7220635>>7220636>>7220638>>7220639>>7220643Explain to me as if I'm a retard why someone likes, let alone would want to buy art like this. There's zero obvious appeal to it>>7220641This one is kinda sick, but I wouldn't pay for it.
>>7221052I think I asked in the wrong place. It seems like everyone just likes the doomer shit which is exactly to be expected.
>>7221233nah people here are just retarded and think if you can't draw a perfect figure from imagination then you should stick to grinding exercises rather than doing anything else. personally anon I think you should get what you find appealing, analyzing art that you like on a technical level is a fruitless endeavor imo.
>>7221233Yes you did. Ic is an insane hospital.
>>7220634 really badto me, this isn't really art. there's two colors and very little effort here. I don't feel any emotion when seeing this shit. consider, by contrast, a Rothko image; sometimes just two colors - but much more dramatic and emotional. there is nothing here>>7220635goodthis has some interesting figure mutation, but there isn't much here. I would say this doesn't go with the other pieces you've selected.>>7220636really badI simply don't enjoy looking at this and don't understand why you think you do, but whatever - if you like it then good for you. I hope you find meaning in it because it's unlikely it was made with any>>7220638goodthis one is fun and interesting. I think the composition is poor, but it's still quite good. this artist has a good understanding of color, depth, and focal points imo>>7220639amazingly badthis is pretty weak. this is a very sloppy watercolor? not sure if this is supposed to just be some dreamscape but this looks like a /beg/ made it>>7220641greatthis one is great, really showing your inconsistent taste though. this also doesn't fit with anything else youve shown here>>7220643goodphotography is a very different art to fully crafted mediums. I am a photographer myself, and I will say this is a great shot - except for the red dot on the top of the image? and I wish the image had lighter lights to provide greater contrast. Anyway it will indeed be weird to hang a photo next to a bunch of paintings
>>7220634kys faggot
every Dead Rising Le Terminal is getting deleted
