Fine art is superior. Post your "fine art" pieces using any medium you desire, digital or trad, just keep the anime coomer shit at the door.
>>7236890heres your fine art coomer slop anon
>>7236938This is fine. It's not faggot anime or faggot furry shit.
>digital fine artYou will never be a painter, digitranny.
>>7236946By fine art I simply mean more traditional subjects. We already have a /trad/ thread, but that one allows whatever subject, this one allows digital, but no anime coomer furry faggot shit.
yet another useless nodraw permabeg thread LOLpyw niggeroh wait you won't, just like the countless times this midwit thread had been shat out before
>>7236890Not a good idea to start a general without posting work first, especially if you're going to insult half the board. Just asking for trouble that way. >>7236950Should've made /conserv/ instead. "Fine art" is way too broad and still covers a lot of the subjects you want to exclude. At least /conserv/ would be something like, "A conservative thread for conservative art. No furries, anime, or cartoons." Maybe also specifying whether you accept abstract art or not would also be helpful, but do note that the more quantifyers you add the more dead the thread will be.
none of you know what fine arts is, dont pretend you do, fucking dilettante losers
What is Fine Art?
Bump goddamnit
>>7239648No goddammit, just let this thread die. Just use the studies, figure, nature, and trad threads.
>>7239668On the contrary, we ought disband those slow threads and merge them into here.