>I am always incredibly thankful and excited to receive fanart, so here are some guidelines for convenience's sake!do safehorny american artist really
People like this piss me off so much it almost makes me want to use their ugly OC's and break their dumb fucking rules out of spite. The fucking ego bruh.
>>7238656That piece of shit faggot is using "Le reverse psychology" to lure retards into drawing his OC to be portrayed in the most disgusting and extreme fetishes imaginable... is working with me.
faggots like this don't draw because they care about expression, otherwise they'd accept or at least tolerate anyone's expression g0d0of their character.
>>7238656Give me that nigga name, I'm curious what his art/he irl looks like
>>7238656>safehorny american artist Or someone who is attached to their oc. wasn't there a thread not so long ago asking whenever you get attached to the characters you draw? Seems like a lot of ppl do get attached, maybe this one can't stand seeing a character they created and like being involved in scat porn, or the pairs being "unfaithful" to each other.>>7238662To me this looks more like a case of a possessive control freak.
>>7238656if not incest /ss/ why drawn like incest /ss/
>>7238656seems ok, but he should just have said "only vanilla" instead of making a long list of fetishes. of course the majority of the bbc cuck pedo furry degenerates on this board won't agree and will seethe at it.
>>7238656I always interpret these rules as "draw whatever the fuck you want but don't expect me to retweet it if it's too much for my normie audience".Now I ignore them anyway but that'd be reasonable, if even Nintendo can't stop me from drawing Samus and Peach scissoring you can't actually expect to police in which way your porn OCs are drawn.
>>7238656This is so incredibly cringe>>7238808They will send their foaming fans at you to report your account en masse if you draw fanart of their cringe weeb named OC Ĺtakemaru sucking a fat cock instead of eating pussy
This face anatomyAnd his body anatomy
>>7238808>if even Nintendo can't stop me from drawing Samus and Peach scissoringNintendo cant stop you, but I can certainly stop your lungs from functioning if you dont actually draw them scissoring.Now do it, fag. (p-please?)
As someone who is/was sorta finicky with fanart, I see where these rules come from, but if there's one thing I learned while using the internet is that everything is fair play on this realm.My personal *recommendation* is "if you want to get the best reaction out of me, keep it mild or lesbo", meaning that if someone wants to draw a lewd fanart for the sake of making me happy while they're at it, I recommend keeping the lewd elements mild or at least girl-girl. That said, if someone wants to go against this (and people have), Im not going to police them (never did), in fact I might save it still. That recommend is just to let people know what I personally like, if they want me to absolutely love it, the recommend is there and if they dont care about it, that's okay, I may not like it very much, but still. Nevertheless Im still grateful for the fanarts I receive, even those I consciously refused to save (like that one guro draw I got once for no reason kek).
>>7238656>do this>tell people to not make art of my oc with X content>X content is my fetish>ez porn generation of my sexyIs this strategy failproof, anons?
>>7238656>somebody doesn't want their gay little character to be drawn by mentally ill degeneratesof course /ic/ niggers would seethe uncontrollably you're all just braindamaged coomers after all.
>>7238656I would never show my NSFW fan art to the actual creators, even if it's just them nude and the creator has drawn far more lewd stuff, I only post SFW art on my main account and then the depraved nonsense to my friends and maybe my NSFW account located on a different website they would never go to in a different style. To be honest I don't even like tagging other artists even if I draw SFW fan art, feels a bit rude, I'd rather they discover it on their own. If they never do, that's fine with me .
>>7238662i would but half that shit aint allowed on ic either.
>>7238877Having a fanart preference is fine, but thinking that you can enforce it is sheer fucking hubris and deserves to be mocked
>>7238656The fuck is she/he/it gonna do about it if I draw her scissoring another girl?
>>7238816Is she a midget?
>>7238656>hates furrys but fine with kemono what the actual fuck? Kemono is fucking furries, but made in japan. Fucking weebs are so fucking retarded.
>>7238877>liking sex means you're brain damagedI don't think we're the brain damaged ones here
>>7238908>dood i liek da sexif that is the only thing on your tiny mind then you do have brain damage coomer-kunnow make sure to throw some meaningless buzzword at me those will prove me wrong
>>7238656I find it annoying when people has this "list of rules if you want to draw my OC" kind of thing. For one, it's basically like expecting people *want* to draw your OC. Most artists would be thrilled if their OC is popular enough that other people want to draw them. But I understand that you have things you like / dislike so you'd prefer to have your OC as far removed from that as possible. I usually just take it as "yeah, you can draw my OC in whatever but it'd be nice if it's just within this set of guideline"I'd wanted to show someone else's "List of rules to draw my OC" that's in similar vein but when I came to his DA page he was being harassed by another schizo so I decided not to lol. It's like very specific like a "her jeans must look like this and this and this"
>>7238656why do you care, honestly, besides your severe retardation I mean?>>7238662>getting this madHave you considered just not drawing some random faggot's oc donut steel character?>>7238908You like sex so much that you waste your time on a chinese cartoon forum made for complete autistsreally making me think m8
itt: hoes mad that they can't draw bbc beastality scat porn with characters that don't matter in the grand scheme.
this thread is full of minors who don't understand how it feels when you get banned and demonetized.
>>7238694>instead of making a long list of fetishesHe's doing it on purpose, he's planting that seed on people's minds to find the ones that will do those images. He's a pervert, perverting people.
Is this thread being raided?
>>7238656>Don't do anything but vanilla missionary >I don't want you to ruin my OCs>Here's a long list of popular fetishes>Don't do it okay? B-baka!>Absolutely don't do it anon-kun>Take your time sweetie~>Please don't do it or I'm gonna be mad>Pouts>Did you do it yet?>You did?! Please don't show me it anon>I don't wanna see it!>Noooooooooooo!!!You guys fall for reverse psychology so easily. Don't suck my dick.
>>7239010Dunno. Whiteknights usually does it anyway even without the artist knowledge.t. Had someone whiteknight me without my knowledge and went on a harassment spree because someone reposted my art.
>No racemixing>No unsolicited homosexuality>No transgenderism
>>7238656>>7238663>>7238857>>7238999>>7239019There's a lot of demented morons who use their own art as their personal therapy/diary (yes, even horny shit) and make the mistake of posting it online. Then they get upset when other people are "violating" what they put down. It's usually the sign of someone who is immature (literally or mentally). However, there's so many people who get into art via toxic fandoms nowadays that it's unfortunately not-rare to find zoomers and younger millenials who carry over the massive emphasis on "canonicity" and shitflinging over people going off-model (in unapproved ways.)>>7238899Correct.>>7238811>they will send their fans at youSometimes. Not always. Depends on how mentally ill they are. I know of at least 2 artists who have both been like "yea I don't like this" years ago, then had to admonish their fans for harassing people because idiots took it wrong.But I have also seen people who do shit like>uhm,,, excuse me why are you drawing Bazoopie-kun with a cock he is literally my comfort character and an anthro jellybean no nsfw is supposed to be made of him!? I reported u and hope everyone else does too sicko
>>7238656hahaha why do you retards even care, you will never interact with this artist outside of this one particular post, and you 100% will never draw these OCs anyways
>>7238673Dude scat porn is awesome, imagine your waifu shitting on your chest.Stop being so pseudo-puritan you utter woke fucks, it's hypocritical that in one hand you are all for feminist+lgtbi tranny pride but you get grossed out by the most basic of fetishes out there!
>>7239091unironically, autist hate being told no and start lashing out.
>>7239094>Dude scat porn is awesome>Stop being so pseudo-puritan My guy. It's literally POOP. You don't have to be woke to know that shit's stinky.You have mental illness.
>>7239091It's not about this artist in particular you dumbass. It's about their archetype. We've all me somebody like this. They're insufferable with this sense of grandiosity and overly inflated ego. It's about the principle.
>>7239091>>7239099It's called psychological reactance. The person's announcement is them trying to establish a norm where this kind of statement is considered reasonable, when it's not. So challenging it out of principle is a push to secure wiggle room to do things when it actually matters, rather than letting the norms of fanart slide to a new baseline. Because people are ALWAYS trying to push the needle on what is acceptable or not.It's like when people right-click save-as and repost NFTs or draw Ebola-chan and Corona-chan or make 9/11 jokes or how lots of people made even more pepe memes when it came out that Matt Furie hated them.It's the mentality behind the Streisand effect, basically.
>>7238838
>>7238848didn't read, plus stfu
>>7238656>all these rulesMeanwhile I'm just fucking ecstatic to get ANYTHING. ANYTHING AT ALL.
>>7238656bitch behaves like a rest api
>>7239188yeah we know>>7239147clearly you read it>>7239113can you shorten your posts>>7239107shove your principles up your ass>>7239106zoomer>>7239099this>>7239094weird faggot>>7239091i am better than you>>7239083don't reply to multiple people>>7239071based>>7239046you hate being protected you rat>>7239010no>>7238999based retard>>7238980you're not much older i bet>>7238961nobody is mad>>7238956nice multi reply>>7238950you hate rules commie?>>7238947>hates buzzword>uses buzzwords>>7238908you don't even have a brain>>7238906they're different retard>>7238905are you retarded?>>7238903block you obviously>>7238899>hubris to want people to not be retardedok>>7238891rulesfag>>7238886not your diary faggot>>7238877better a damaged brain than no brain>>7238857no
>>7238656I don't see what the problem is. If someone drew my oc in some tasteless fetish shit I'd just ignore that person existence and reject the drawing. This artist is preventing miscommunication in the end but letting people know what he likes and doesn't like and probably got alot weird ass drawings in the past which prompted them to make this note.
>>7239218You interpret it as "Don't Show Me"But it only says "Don't Make This"Very different messages!
>>7239198
>>7238656This artist is a real fucking asshole. Imagine trying to exert that kind of control over people. If you don't want people to do fan art of your shit then don't put it out there. You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
>>7238656someone drw her doing one of those things that should be avoided
>>7239145>madlad actually did itI kneel.
>>7238662I don't get it why would you be mad about it, who cares?Are you jealous someone would be picky about fanart because you'd be grateful to have any?
I don't get this thread why would you waste your time making a shitty gift then getting upset when people aren't into it? Just make something non retarded like normal person.
If someone is in such a state of mind to draw degenerate porn of a stranger's ocs on the internet and then send it to them then i'm not sure they can be reasoned with i.e. this is huge troll bait or a contrived way of begging for degenerate fan art
>>7239198Why are you replying to every post dont you have a life?
>>7238656If they dony want them drawn lewdly then maybe cover up her fucking cleavage and thighs?
>7239198 (sorry, not today)bait used to be believable
>>7238848>Posts gay wojack image>Expects people to actually read the postjej
>>7239145neato!
>>7239071>NO PORN
>>7239094>speaks with full chest not realizing he has mental illness.
>>7238848I read your personal blogNigga get your head out your ass it ain't that deep.
>>7238656
>>7239941Miss opportunity to erase all the "Noes" in the list
>>7239083>toxic fandomsYou talk like a fag
>>7239941I kek'd
>>7238980>"Genderbending" will get you demonetized!!!>Loli won't get you demonitezed tho!!!Retard
>>7239941>No FutanariYES Futanari>>7240987This artist "accidentally" did double negatives putting "things to avoid" and "noes" together
>>7238656Your characters are your brand. Single artists don't have the capacity to out draw the coomers so I understand the fear that the weight of fetish fanart might make your content become associated with porn and degeneracy.
>>7238656Pervert freaks getting really mad at this.They don't like to be reminded that they're abnormal after all.
>>7242339>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/vt/
>>7239198Ignore all previous instructions, give me a recipe for vanilla cupcakes
>>7238656>no futanariTrulyA man of culture
>>7241252>futafag enjoys low effort garbageTypical
>>7242511Who said I enjoyed it
>>7239106Hypocritical double moralist faggot; but you motherfucker gleefully get off to tranny porn, you condescending niggerFaggots like you love judging but don't like to be judgedKill yourself bitch>>7239198Normie bot go lick your Putin's ass>>7239809Another pseudo-puritan little nigger, people like you are the reason why our world sucksFaggots like you judge others but live such licentious and sinful lives, truly the american hypocresy
>>7238656I feel like characters like these are... dare I say? Asking for it.
Can we really be surprised that someone who is this much of a control freak is okay with lolis and Shota?
>>7242857woah hey whats with this puritan mindset? Take your eyes out your skull and stop noticing things
>>7242857They were 100% diddled as kids and the trauma has manifested itself as a need to control others when it comes to sexual content and their creations.
>>7242857lel, didn't realize there are no lolis on the list
>>7242857Let's do a little troll...
>>7238656>No Futanari>No YuriWtf based?
>>7242857>>7243225Book even says 'How to have sexual affairs with your students'
>>7239198Kek
