Until I define the literal propagation of the biforms I’ll be stuck with these kinds of drawings: not arbitrary, but not highly persuasive.Still, I’m not too worried—once it’s defined, progress will be exponential.
>>7369865uoooh
>>7369868Please don't be so cryptic, it's annoying......
>>7369865Didactically speaking, seminal evidence seems to explicate the fact that your repudiation of entropy supports my theory of space-time synthesis. Of this, I am irrefutably confident.
>>7369904:sob: :sob: :sob:
>>7370072I only use certain distant words for precision and communicative economy. The 'peculiar flavor' is due to the fact that certain concepts are not solidified in the current canon, so I must stretch the semantics a little to represent/evoke my concepts without extending too much. Unnecessary ornamentation is just a waste of energy, and I'm too lazy for that.If you think that this is just an immature schizoopost to attract attention, then I can define each of the terms used in this thread to clear up doubts: 'TC' is 'theoretical creativity', which is the hypothetical axiomatic study of the aesthetic-psychological phenomenon; 'Biform' is the psychological structure used to format/label the visual stimulus received by appealing to local historical conditioning; 'Literal propagation' is the mathematical definition of the 'flow/journey' of the biform from its complex-simple extremes. The latter is of great importance in TC since the nature of the propagation determines the aesthetic pleasure. You can see this in trypophobic images or in the neotenous faces of anime. In fact, the Japanese have instinctively come closer to this truth, which is why their popular art is extremely influential.
>>7370173relax dude I just copy pasted text from Earthbound for a lol
>>7370193The extrapersonal origin of the text isn't necessarily a problem; in fact, it can inspire the development of ideas.
>>7370173You're gonna have to dumb it down even further
