milk its demo for all it's worth

>>7377470
I can look past the elephantiasis but why the elf ears
>>7377471
mouthwashing demographic is genderblob gurofujos you gotta start drawing the bandaged amputee dude getting his cuntboy pussy destroyed if you want to milk these types

>>7377484
i played the game but I dont understand what about it attracted these kind of people

>>7377499
its indie horrorshit + "big evil hot guy abusing weak injured helpless guy"
these sorts of women always go for a certain type of media with certain types of characters in it

>>7377499
what this guy mostly what this guy said >>7377503 and some youtuber talking about it/playing it in a way that got people interested, but more than half of the fans don't even play the games, they just like the "vibe" to it. Happens a lot online

>>7377504
mostly what this guy said* need sleep

>>7377484
>why the elf ears
from his profile, it's a feature he likes

>”omg guys new indie game”
>wait 1 months
>old game hype obliterated
>new indie game now popular
>last indie game forgotten
fotm saṃsāra
do not draw
escape cycle

>>7377624
yep draw eternally popular characters like Miku or Evangelion or Hololive or something instead

>>7377630
no

>>7377484
>why the elf ears
elf ears are cute

>>7377499
What "game"?

>>7377484
>mouthwashing demographic is genderblob gurofujos you gotta start drawing the bandaged amputee dude getting his cuntboy pussy destroyed if you want to milk these types
I understood like 20% of that sentence

>>7377630
maybe just don't post anything on the internet unless you want a personal virtual gallery

File: 1648572175709.gif (276 KB, 240x287)

276 KB GIF

>>7377470
>What to do if your art post reaches its targeted demographic
Unite all waifufags, make them rise in arms and march with them towards the horizon as their flag, rejoicing and chanting about our revered fictional women until my last breath.

>>7377630
One of these is not like the others

>>7377470
Generic coomslop, the ability to draw is wasted on guys like this. What is it about the coomer male mind that just slaps the same features (ooga booga big tits and thighs) on barely distinguishable characters

File: 1720611742576182.png (720 KB, 1920x1080)

720 KB PNG

>>7377470
ehhh when it comes to porn or lewds of fictional characters i'm always split between "who cares, r34 ftw" and "everything has its place". mouthwashing isn't life-changing to anyone who regularly consumes media beyond gacha/marvel-slop but it is a solid, moving story, and it feels pretty cheap to see one of its characters (anya) ran through the gooner grinder. especially since she's a rape victim.

then again i check op's post and he apparently didn't even play the game kek, coomers gonna coom

>>7378014
I have a problem with the total lack of… I don't know if artistry is the right word, but the idea of just seeing a hot fictional character and immediately giving her massive tits and thighs makes the artist seem like a mindless coomer. It's like nothing matters but the combination of hot face + hot features the guy drew on her

>especially since she's a rape victim.
I guess but no one would give a fuck if someone drew Guts from Berserk getting fucked in the ass and he's a rape victim

File: 236b946e7c83f00a7f279c16c(...).png (53 KB, 240x414)

53 KB PNG

>>7378014
>when it comes to porn or lewds of fictional characters i'm always split between "who cares, r34 ftw" and "everything has its place".
>it feels pretty cheap to see one of its characters (anya) ran through the gooner grinder. especially since she's a rape victim.
I think I know why that split happens, because you respect a character's integrity and if said integrity doesnt make them lewd material unless you go out of you way to break it or go way too out of character, then its wrong. I have a similar sentiment with Samus Aran, she is undoubtedly hot and based on looks alone, she is peak coom material... but when you take the time to understand her character (the little there is) you realize she is not good for coom unless you break her character, then every coom art of her becomes wrong or cheap.
There are certain characters you can bargain your way around to make them coom material alright, but some of them are just not. Then again this whole thing is pretty subjective sometimes.

>>7377470
rejoice? put your fingers on the sides of your mouth and try to form it into the shape of a smile

File: All the same.jpg (53 KB, 554x554)

53 KB JPG

>>7377952
>What is it about the coomer male mind that just slaps the same features (ooga booga big tits and thighs)
It's something biological, big tits send a signal to the male brain that the woman will provide plenty of milk to his baby, but all of that is in back of the mind, unconscious stuff so in the front they're just attracted to them because their brain say so.
It's the same reason why wide hips are so attractive, they're a symbol of giving birth to healthy babies.
The equivalent to coomer female mind would be a man being tall and rich (protection) and handsome (good genes)
Most femoids like the same features too.

>>7378510
Female coomers want low set strong eyebrows, hunter eyes, high cheekbones, strong jaw, long neck, broad shoulders, veiny arms, large hands, long legs, massive cock.

>>7377470
I'm so glad I don't keep up with whatever stupid drama this is about

>>7377778
That means you're still human and should get out before it's too late

>>7377470
Draw more

File: d0d3243f515173be79047e3f7(...).jpg (60 KB, 735x686)

60 KB JPG

>>7377770
mouthwashing

>>7378521
i do too though.

>>7377499
people trick themselves into thinking indie games are good and that garbage happens to be the hot new indie

>>7377499
Bad luck?

>>7379843
This is supposed to be the same character?

>>7379857
Yes. That is what she officially is while OP is so off model it may as well be a different character.

>>7377470
The trannies trying to dox this guy deserve the worst cancer possible, even though the original artist is a sensitive faggot as well.

>>7378014
>>7378037
>BUT MUH CANON STOP TRYING TO DRAW PORN OF MY COMFORT CHARACTER
No one fucking cares, cancel trannies deserve the rope always. Fuck censorship.

File: 1732558794733.jpg (322 KB, 594x843)

322 KB JPG

This artist draws one thing

>>7380331
off model fotm coom?

>>7380348
that would explain why they break down at the slightest drama. all of their output is validation seeking

>>7380331
Yes, welcome to
>how to make it 101

File: Untitled.png (133 KB, 788x718)

133 KB PNG

>>7377470
people on twitter are seething over this drawing type like its an actual person
i will never understand these people

>>7380425
Just say you're a rape survivor too

>>7380425
I thought most of these people already left to bluesky

>>7380425
I know interacting with these types in any way is pointless but I don't get why someone being a rape survivor precludes them from ever being seen in a sexual light again, if anything that seems kind of dehumanizing. But ultimately it's a video game character who has no rights of her own so it's not like she can post her own nudes with #fuckmen or something.
In any case it's still pretty clear OP just saw her design and thought it was coomworthy without really paying attention to the game or the character.

>>7378521
where do I show myself off to those female coomers

>>7380331
and he does it well, he's on my master study backlog

>>7380510
>why someone being a rape survivor precludes them from ever being seen in a sexual light again
It's pretty common for people in the porn industry to be prior victims of rape or sa
There is a correlation

File: b43b8356d4200d4d0b3e6862a(...).png (281 KB, 500x375)

281 KB PNG

>>7380322
Anon, neither of us is making a case on what you can or cant draw. Make Samus a space slut for all I care. Why the fuck are you being so confrontational? Calm the fuck down.
>B-BUT I DONT CA-
You obviously do, otherwise you wouldnt be throwing a needless hissy fit here.
>trannies out of nowhere
I used to think people who called "trannies live rent free in your head" were retarded... but then I find people like you proving them right, so what fucking gives...

>>7380583
>master
lmao

>>7380583
Aim higher

>>7380322
>BUT MUH CANON STOP TRYING TO DRAW PORN OF MY COMFORT CHARACTER
not what i'm saying. i'm not saying DON'T draw that i'm saying it's cringe and weak. you can't go
>m-muh censorship!! d-don't tell anyone what to do!!!
while trying to censor and tell people what to do, now eat shit nigger

>>7380767
there's no higher when you're aiming for impressions

>>7377470
Can we please kill this guy and anyone who fetishizes SA victims and children? With hammers?

>>7380331
Half of these are children. Gross. No wonder lolicucks defend this degenerate.

>>7380929
Dude late Gen Z/early Alpha is so based. Chillz.

>>7380425
Green with flies?

File: GdHaWPoWkAAHXQD.jpg (541 KB, 2209x1461)

541 KB JPG

>>7380510
>me when I'm illiterate and don't understand how fiction affects reality
Also you say shit like this when you have artists masking their shock art like "IT'S CCONSENSUAL SHE'S REEXPLORING SEX"

>>7380931
Millennial and having morals and ethics is incredibased, actually

>>7380331
how do I draw in this style, unironically
>just exaggerate bro
literally thousands of other arists do this, some in /ic/ even, yet practically none reach this level of aesthetic appeal and uniqueness

>>7380943
Just draw an hourglass shaped blob and put a face on top, then make it cosplay the Sexy Whatever version of the current fotm waifu. There. That's your standard coom artist formula.

File: 1710210887690694.jpg (84 KB, 1885x1057)

84 KB JPG

I have the strange hunch that whatever is happening between this thread and >>7375727 is the work of a singular schizo larping as an outraged twitter user...
I can only expect this kind of lunatic behavior on this hellsite of a board.

>>7380949
Struck a nerve so much that you need to whine to this thread, too? You lolicucks and gooners really are a bunch of snowflakes

>>7380949
Sometimes, x schizos find their way here to try to virtue signal and piss channers off. It could be that cris impersonator got bored though.

>>7380969
Or it could just be people are getting tired of you corny ass pornsick losers

>>7380972
Nah. You're the one that doesn't belong here. You should go back to your containment zone.

>>7380975
And if I don't?

>>7380959
yawn

>>7380989
I accept your concession

Anya does not deserve the kind of "fans" Casca has that fetishize her as a rape victim and even make jokes about it

>UHM ACKTUYALL AS A VICTIM OF SA I HOLE THE AUTHORITAH OF ALL SA VICTIMS WHEN I SAY RAPE CULTURE AND CHILD PORN ARE A-OK IF IT'S FICTION
-every fucking "sa victim" defending shit like this

>>7381021
why are you bringing kids into this

>>7381022
Why does USA draw "aged up" children >>7380331

M1das (and by extension every libtard) are the most annoying, whining retards on the internet. And every person wasting their lives creating meaningless drama are also the biggest pieces of retarded shitheads that should have their heads blown to pieces.
Why can't people just focus on shit that matters and ignore shit they hate? Why does OP have to make another garbage xwitter thread like its reddit? Where's the fucking jannies? I hate it here.

>>7381028
Then go back, pedo

>>7381024
because he has good taste.
by your logic, if I draw porn of an aged down adult it should be completely fine, because the actual depiction doesn't matter.
good news loli chads, you can draw adults as 3 year olds with this loophole!

>>7381030
>because he has good taste.
Anon, he draws the same tired shit over and over
Also
>>7381030
>by your logic, if I draw porn of an aged down adult it should be completely fine, because the actual depiction doesn't matter.
So I can draw a picture of you getting the death sentence, right? After all, it's just a drawing.

>>7381032
well yeah, it would just be a drawing

>>7381032
Yeah, I wouldn't give a shit. Go for it.
So you're okay with aged down adults? If aged up children isn't okay because the character is originally a child, an aged down adult is fine because the character was originally an adult.

>>7381034
That's not ok either? Also why do you want to draw an adult as a child? Are you some kind of degenerate?
Oh, right, you're a "loli chad"

>>7381032
>Anon, he draws the same tired shit over and over
I est the same delicious burger over and over. I watch the same good movies and play the same good games over and over. Doing the same thing repeatedly doesn't suddenly make it bad.

>>7381042
>That's not ok either?
Give an actual reason. It's an adult character, so it shouldn't matter what age they're depicted as by your logic.

>>7381044
We get it, you're a mindless consoomer who likes repetition and hates depth
>>7381046
So I can draw you as a child getting mpregged?

>>7381049
>So I can draw you as a child getting mpregged?
Yes, absolutely. Do it. Draw me getting murdered. Draw me as a fetus getting aborted. I do not care.
Now give an actual argument.

>>7381051
How about morals and human decency?

>>7381059
Nope, give an actual argument you intellectually dishonest cunt.
Your stance is that it's sick and wrong to draw an adult depiction of a character that was originally a child because they were originally child.
Now explain how the opposite of that isn't fine using your same logic.

>>7381061
>give me an argument
>NOOOOOO NOT THAT ONE!!!!!
Like I said. You pedos and coomers are snowflakes.

>>7381065
You haven't given a single argument. I'll take that as your concession because you don't actually believe the bullshit you spout and just want to virtue signal.
You've never actually put an ounce of thought into any viewpoint you hold, you just hold those views because someone told you to and you never questioned anything.
If that's not the case, go ahead and answer the question with an explanation. Just fill in the blank with something that won't be destroyed by the inverse scenario.

An adult depiction of a character that was originally a child is bad because ___.

>>7381069
I have. You just dismissed it because it doesn't go against your headcanon.

>>7381076
>Fill in the blank with something that won't be destroyed by the inverse scenario.
>An adult depiction of a character that was originally a child is bad because ___.

Stop deflecting. I'm making this as simple as humanly possible for you. You can't just say
>w-well it's morally wrong and indexent!
Without explaining how. It's bad because it's bad isn't an argument. Give reasoning why it's immoral or indecent.

>>7381077
>"bruh how is sexualizing a child bad"

>>7381081
Okay, so sexualizing an adult depicted as any age is fine by you. Thanks for playing.

>>7381083
You're still sexualizing a child, retard. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.

>>7381096
How?
If sexualizing an adult is bad because in their source material they're a kid, sexualizing a child should be totally fine as long as they started out as an adult

>>7380932
its a zoomer thing but they misused it
like if someone says they have aura you could reply yeah green aura with flies (implying they dont have aura and are in fact stinky)

>>7380501
they have extensive blocklists there so they can't interact with the people they'd normally harass at all

>>7381049
>So I can draw you as a child getting mpregged?
You niggers can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy.
This is a big problem in American society, where people live in illusions, imagining they are women when they are not, believing that an image can be any age.
A fictional character can't have any age at all. Age is a property of a living organism and even age exists exclusively within human society, nature doesn't care how many turns of the earth around the sun you have experienced.

>>7381032
>So I can draw a picture of you getting the death sentence, right? After all, it's just a drawing.
anon did you really think this was a gotcha? did you really think anyone wouldn’t just say “yes of course”?

>>7381106
>>7381147
>>7381151
I'm not the one defending the fetishization of rape victims and sexualization of children

>>7381156
>anon prefers to be on the offense when it comes to rape and abuse
metal

Clearly this person is just a couple more good points and gotchas away from completely changing their mind. Keep up the good work everybody, it's time well-spent.

>>7379843
>>7379857
What is the game about? Is it worth playing? My entire family is dead. Will this fill the void?

>>7380988
You'll eventually get so triggered you'll have an irl breakdown like everyone else who's tried to "raid" 4chan.
It looks like you're already halfway there from this thread alone.

>>7378521

Can confirm

>>7381163
>>7381190
Oh dear. Samefagging this hard? Over "just a drawing"?

File: ab.jpg (130 KB, 904x1280)

130 KB JPG

>>7381156
You're just plain stupid. If someone commits a crime like raping a woman, all the responsibility lies with the person who did it. What does that have to do with artists or writers? If some unhinged person decides to go on a killing spree after reading your post here, does that make you guilty? Of course not. People are responsible for their own actions. If a drawing is enough to push someone to act, the problem is with them, not with the creator of the content.

So, try to distinguish between reality and fiction. If I draw your friends suffering in agony, will that affect them in the real world? Obviously not. Can you call it a terrible thing to draw? Sure, you can. But so what?

>>7381160
based

File: mouthwashing-2024-11.jpg (54 KB, 1200x675)

54 KB JPG

>>7381173
You're part of a small crew ferrying cargo between two star systems. (think Alien)
It's the last manned mission of its kind. All future cargo ferries will use automated vessels with no human pilots.

Something goes wrong, and the ship is damaged. The crypods are all broken, with years left of the journey.
Out of desperation, the crew open the cargo hold. They hope to find usable supplies among the vast expanse of shelves that stretch far beyond what the eye can see.
They start opening the boxes, and find that every single one is filled with cheap mouthwash.

The game is pretty good, and only 2-3 hours long. It's not surprising that some people became attached to the characters.
If it interests you, I'd recommend not reading anything else about it.

>>7381278
>have cargo capacity that stretches beyond visible range
>don't have a few drums of flour per crewman
risible

>>7381282
They're also sealed off from much of the ship. They have to make do with what they can still access.
Anyway, such concerns about wasting cargo capacity to account for unlikely events is why squishy human crewman are being phased out.

>>7381106
I like how they just never had any counter to this kek

>>7381030
>>7381034
I think you should stop entertaining this retarded faggot

>>7380988
You'll become one of us eventually. It's already started. Can you feel it? You're here forever.

>>7381301
I don't blame him, it's hard to have a counter for "sexualizing a child should be totally fine".

>>7381315
Why would that be hard anon?

>>7381318
Give it a try

>>7381318
It's hard to prevent somebody from shooting on his own goal.

>>7381301
there are no counters besides brick

File: 200.gif (334 KB, 343x200)

334 KB GIF

>>7381325
Don't do it anon, he's trying the oldest trick in the book.

>>7381318
I mean, it gets me hard.

>>7381315
>>7381325
Huh, that is pretty hard, actually. I guess there's no reason why it wouldn't be fine.

>>7381106
De-age bros...we won the moral high ground.

It's always sad to think about how the world would be different if these people could rally against genuinely real human rights issues instead of the rights of fictional cartoon characters or imaginary gender issues.

Like, say social media was rallied against human and sex trafficking. Women murdered for showing their faces in middle eastern countries. Going after actual pedophiles who hide amongst their numbers.

I wonder if we'd actual see some positive, worthwhile changes in our world... but nope, it's all about killing babies, the rights to cut off children's body parts, and the sexual representation of fictional characters.

>>7381370
>Going after actual pedophiles who hide amongst their numbers.
Well they wouldn't go after themselves

>>7381370
>instead of the rights of fictional cartoon characters
it's all just about taking the easiest path because they don't actually give a shit about anything they're championing.

>>7381243
Reading your post made me realize the person you're replying to is the kind of person to project own lack of resolve to take responsibility for own actions

Lolicons are very impressive, they're literally all ace detective profiling mindreaders that know what you really meant when you ask them to account for their hentai selections.

It's impressive when out of the million horrible things in the world to care about that hurt people every day, and a trillion other weird creepy fetishes to wonder about, you choose to spend your time demanding strangers on the internet answer to some perceived crime they committed in your head because they shared drawings of a small body type in their own little corner of the internet.

>>7381450
You know what happens when you question haglovers about their weird ass taste? They post more hags and call you a faggot.

>>7381370
Driving people from attacking Epstein and P Diddy associates to attacking random internet artists is very easy if you have money and an interest on it. Art has always been the escapegoat historically. And an actual drawing of a child is a lot more striking than words, after all.

>>7381450
>of a small body type
>>7380331
these are all grown ass adults

>>7381443
Fill in the blank with something that won't be destroyed by the inverse scenario.
>An adult depiction of a character that was originally a child is bad because ___.

>>7381460
Keep at it Columbo

>>7381468
Fill in the blank with something that won't be destroyed by the inverse scenario.
>An adult depiction of a character that was originally a child is bad because ___.

>>7381460
because it implies you want to have sex with a child

>>7381483
Oh, just one more thing, why did you reply to a post about lolicons if you're only interested in adult women?

>>7380331
Something tells me this thigger was still underaged just before the Covid panic started.

>>7381486
by the same logic, an aged down adult implies you want to have sex with an adult.
try again.

>>7381492
>what's the difference between being a child mentally or physically
you're a pedo in both cases

>>7381496
>what's the difference between being an adult mentally or physically

>>7381500
>I'm not a pedo if I want to have sex with someone that is mentally a child because ___.

>>7381492
>give girl a dick
gay
>feminize guy
gay
>age up child
pedo
>age down adult
pedo
Very complicated stuff I know.

>>7381505
>>I'm a pedo if I want to have sex with someone that is mentally an adult because ___.

try again.

File: LeThinkOfTheChildrenFace,jpeg.png (600 KB, 1559x2792)

600 KB PNG

>>7381147
>This is a big problem in American society
Because their choice is either making-up fake scenarios about literal nothingburgers to get offended by even further or just straight-up killing at least 95% of their ruling class who are way too rich and powerfull to ever stop raping real "vulnerable persons" on their own volition.

File: 1694018288227562.jpg (32 KB, 550x653)

32 KB JPG

Getting pulled in for a DUI, insisting that I didn't have any alcohol to drink because i added orange juice to vodka, not vodka to orange juice.

>>7381512
>I'm not a pedo if I want to have sex with someone that is physically a child because ___.

try again.

>>7381515
>I'm a pedo if I want to have sex with someone that is physically an adult because ___.

So you literally have no actual logical reason why an aged up child is bad that wouldn't then make an aged down adult good.
Good job, retard.

>>7381520
because they're mentally a child

>>7381522
and aged down adults are mentally adults.

>>7381524
and physically children

>>7381522
and physically adults

>>7381525
looks like we're done here, and by your own reasoning, it's now fine to draw pedophelia as long as you only draw characters that were originally depicted as adults.

>>7381486
Well actually I project myself into the child instead of their rapist, so what now troonie-chan?

>>7381528
way to out yourself, no one said anything about projection

>>7381533
I already knew you're a guy who cut-off his dick though

>>7381527
no, by my own reasoning, both scenarios make you a pedophile

>>7377484
>mouthwashing demographic is genderblob gurofujos you gotta start drawing the bandaged amputee dude getting his cuntboy pussy destroyed if you want to milk these types
This sentence reads like it came out of a Markov chain.

>>7381536
are you projecting as the dick or the tranny?

>>7381527
to be clear, my stance is as follows:
It's pedophilic to draw any character depicted as a child in a sexual way, though its still your right to do so and I just won't consume that media.
Likewise, I find it completely normal to depict any character as an adult in a sexual way. There's absolutely nothing morally reprehensible about drawing a character that originated as a child grown up, because there's nothing about that drawing that implies there's anything childlike about them anymore.
Ultimately, draw whatever the fuck you like, because it's all just art.

>>7381537
Nope, that's not how your reasoning works at all.
Is an adult an adult because they have the body of an adult? If so, an aged up character with the body of an adult is no longer a child.
Is a child a child because they have the mentality of a child? If so, an aged down character with the mentality of an adult is still an adult.
Either way you can't remain intellectually consistent because it makes the inverse of the thing you're complaining about okay.

Do lolicons act like cornered rats because the accustations make them feel shame?
Or are they just naturally shameful and ratlike around their peers and that's why they turned out this way?

>>7381556
When you're called a faggot and ignored you just seethe in the open and spam reports all day until some tired wagecuck mod logs in at the start of the day to 9000 hits on a drawing and just wants to see seeing your incessant whining go away

>>7381556
>get witchunted more that criminals and pedophiles in the government and powerful organisations
>"why are you so scared or getting torn apart by a mindless raging mob, chud? got something to hide, since you want to stay alive?"

As always with retarded women, they can't actually defend their views with logic and reasoning so they resort to name calling and personal attacks to attempt to get the moral highground in a hope it will make their indefensible position seem correct.

>>7381570
your position was dismantled by a gigachad shitpost, did anything else need to be said?

>>7381579
Where was it dismantled?

>>7381546
No, I'm your stepdad who raped your bussy when you were only 6

>>7381373
>>7381374
>>7381456
It's just really sad when you think about it. You have all these people focused on crap that doesn't matter in the slightest, meanwhile you have nightmarish stuff happening in first world countries. After I had the human trafficking thing hit pretty close to home it made me realize just how sickeningly shallow and useless the various "social justice" campaigns are. You have lol-cow celebrities crying about women's "reproductive rights" all the while actual women are being kidnapped, taken from their families, and thrust into a nightmarish trade. People go around championing the rights of cartoon characters while there are actual rights being violated but nobody covers them because they open up some uncomfortable questions.

It's just aggravating.

>>7377470
The crashout people had over this drawing was so bad that the creator of the game themselves had to come out and tell the fandom "If you don't like it, just block it and move on. Don't harrass people."

And they just got mad at the creator instead.

>>7381556

Considering how easy it is to fuck someone's life up just by accusing them of messing with real kids, of course people are going to react negatively when you slap them with that shit over fictional drawings.

>>7377503
this
don't look up omegaverse
exact same mental illness in all its autistic glory
and you thought train and lego autists were bad ...

>>7381623
>And they just got mad at the creator instead.
Who cares what the perpetually offended get mad at?
Cancel culture only works if you subscribe to its ideology

>>7380331
This is the type of 'artist' ai will replace

>>7381641
No it's not.

>>7381641
You word that like it's a good thing, yet having consistent subjects and styles are exactly the variables that allow artists to exist somewhat comfortably in this world.

>>7381667
it's so weird to me that these retards think having a consistent style and subject is somehow a bad thing.

>>7381683
Anybody who thinks it's bad hasn't actually grown an audience let alone had many commissions. It's like they don't understand that having an established brand is one of the most if not most important things of freelancing. You only break the mold if it stops selling. It's not rocket science.

>>7380331
Fucking based honestly

>>7381542
Done right Markov chains are actually very accurate
They're used in DNA analysis and the original Google algorithm before it was made gay and retarded
So you're right

>>7381278
Thanks for the analysis anon

>>7381628
There's a very easy solution to that problem.

>>7377484
Thats insane, this already exists. https://x.com/R_Haare

>>7377470
this case is honestly kinda hilarious
the artist clearly has absolutely no clue about the game and must have just seen this character being popular on twitter and going "oh shit, gotta cash in on this trend", then churning out some quick coomer drawing thinking it's gonna do numbers, only to learn that the game and fandom are sort of very much not that kind of game and fandom

>>7377484
>you gotta start drawing the bandaged amputee dude getting his cuntboy pussy destroyed
that sounds hot af actually

>>7381556
Both. If they really didn't care about being pedophiles ( by Japan own definition of what a lolicon is no less) they wouldn't melt down and bloviate about muh real child molesters like whiny bitches all of the time. Shame works. Always remind them that they are pathetic losers.

>>7382880
>Always remind them that they are pathetic losers
I find the fake justice warrior faggot more of a pathetic loser personally.

>>7382829
his exact words were
>I was listening to a live video of this game while I was drawing, and the moment I saw Anya, I thought she was cute, so I drew her.

>>7380331
these feel very dynamic, i like them a lot.

The only immoral act in art is plagiarism.
There are many tasteless acts in art, though.

>>7377470
I love women that look like overfed squidward...

File: GYaR2-kbwAAJsDx.png (16 KB, 1430x686)

16 KB PNG

>>7377470
Anya sexo...

>>7381282
Cheapskate corpo pls understand

>>7383623
This is basically what the actual game devs had to come out and say

File: 1716375105822558.png (2.62 MB, 3574x4742)

2.62 MB PNG

I came to /ic/ to look exactly for this thread

fake and gay and astroturfed

>>7384027
This image implies my little pony wasn't and isn't still a successful ip with little girls

>>7384032
yes, nigger, i hate toast.

>>7384033
>>7384027
the fuck is going on? what does this have to do with anything?

File: 1708052613025227.png (27 KB, 545x289)

27 KB PNG

>>7377470
>>7380331
>>7380425
The dev had to step in and tell you faggots to stop harassing this bitch nigga japanese artist, and you still won't get it through your thick skulls.

File: tegaki_2024_05_22_11_18_38.png (15 KB, 400x400)

15 KB PNG

>>7384027
dont forget to add the companion post anon-sama

File: 1732832824937739.png (554 KB, 1224x688)

554 KB PNG

I find it funny how porn addi-- i mean, based nsfw content enjoyers because porn is epic, go to the rescue and start blaming minors and trannies, when in fact the main active target demographic for coomslop are minors and trannies.
And if it's not that it's the puritans.
And if it's still not that it must be antis.
And if it still doesn't stop people from daring to criticize porn, they must be jealous.
And if anyone says anything it's "but it's le fictional pic and women aren't inherently sexual"

Nigger, that image was purposefully made to arouse, it didn't just come into existence by itself. Everything in a picture is a conscious choice by the artist.
Hate the fujopuritantrannyantichatholicalbinojewpolnazis all you want, because how dare anyone dare to dare daring to not go awooga and furiously jerk off whenever they see porn, but they got a point, whatever that might be.

Also you fags still don't get that they're making you seethe on purpose to farm content because much like lolishitters getting called pedophiles, you can't help yourselves trying to justify your no sex having coping mechanism that you NEED others to validate it for you.

Imagine that you need others to validate what you like or else they're "antis".
It's exactly like trannies calling you a bigot because you don't want to let them touch kids.

>>7384402
>you can't help yourselves trying to justify your no sex having coping mechanism
extreme projection

>>7384427
>overt attachment to and consumption of pornographic material is not a coping mechanics with a lack of sexual activity
if you're heavy into porn, you aren't getting laid.
If you're getting laid and into porn, you're mentally ill and addicted to porn.

>>7377484
it's his "thing"

File: 1723172467590030.jpg (456 KB, 2000x1038)

456 KB JPG

>>7380331
literally this meme
holy lmao

File: 1481921068714.jpg (169 KB, 590x597)

169 KB JPG

Came here from the frontpage.
This shit is cringe.
>rape victim
Into the trash with the other used goods.

File: 1731032350505255.png (233 KB, 768x900)

233 KB PNG

>>7384402
>And if it still doesn't stop people from daring to criticize porn, they must be jealous.

>>7380331
People follow him for Thing, and he puts out more of Thing
"hey, there's a new post by Thing artist!"
They know exactly what to expect, and are pleased when he does more of the same
Arguably better than when you gain followers, draw something different, and lose them

>>7384402
Who colored this drawing

>>7386418
that is not art then
it's a product, the anti thesis to art
and the ones enjoying it are not art enjoyers, they're just your average consumers indulging in nothing but shallow primal urges.

You don't call a square on a canvas art either, because that's called avoiding paying taxes.

>>7386453
Shut up retard

>>7386474
coomslop will never be art

>>7386476
Shut up retard
It's human creative expression that evokes an emotion and is therefore art.

>>7386489
pp getting hard is not an emotion

File: 162133931318.jpg (18 KB, 275x268)

18 KB JPG

>>7386514

>>7386514
Excitement is absolutely an emotion. Holy fuck, you're stupid.

>>7386567
Arousal is not an emotion, it's an absolute physical response.
If you get excited by any and all nude pictures, you shouldn't try to mimic human speech.

>>7386574
You backed yourself into a corner. It's unbelievably pathetic seeing the mental gymnastics you're attempting to perform to get out of it.

File: 1712249375208796.png (26 KB, 1378x948)

26 KB PNG

>>7386577
i accept your concession, monkey.

>>7378521
women into fantasy webtoons with highly censored smut (not even porn, just smut) are not coomers kek. women are too mentally cucked to ever get there

>>7378020
>I guess but no one would give a fuck if someone drew Guts from Berserk getting fucked in the ass and he's a rape victim

he’s also a man with a giant sword who could easily kill or harm anyone who came for him. moreover he was raped as a *child*. if someone drew child guts being raped then yes there would be outrage and callouts.

>>7386514
>>7386574
Not only is sexual desire universally considered an emotion, the physiological concept of arousal is core to how we analyze and categorize all emotions.
Your brain is never separate from your body and its senses. You mind is not an island apart from the physical.
You are a meat golem, and to pretend otherwise is silly cope.

>>7381639
I care because it's fucking funny

>>7388288
>Not only is sexual desire universally considered an emotion
Yes
>the physiological concept of arousal is core to how we analyze and categorize all emotions.
Freudtardation got thoroughly refuted by Jung
>Your brain is never separate from your body and its senses.
Yes
>You mind is not an island apart from the physical.
>You are a meat golem, and to pretend otherwise is silly cope.
Acting like a bitter, undereducated midwit won't make wrong arguments work, lil bro

Why is this usa guy constantly in the spotlight for stupid shit like this?
I don't know if I've ever seen someone as popular act like such a whiny little bitch

>>7389162
that's typical for coom artist.

>>7380943
>style
nigger it's just anime, fuck you "style" kids are annoying.
>>7380583
>master
lol

File: 1720897554363278.jpg (56 KB, 619x320)

56 KB JPG

>dude le ps2 retro graphics horror game
fuck off
also kek at dbztrannies being one of the first reviews of this kusoge, like flies to shit

>>7389169
seethe, bitter fossil

>>7389151
It's ok if you just don't know.
The rest of us do know what emotions are because we can read and we're not autistic.

>>7389191
Keep telling that to yourself

File: 1731752532991819.gif (2.58 MB, 320x240)

2.58 MB GIF

>>7388288
>he isn't able to observe himself from a third objective perspective
>"like lol arousal is like how we think everything because sex is heckin epic and we're just LE meat golems"
Ye, you are a golem.

>>7389182
I will cause it's a dumb fucking question that gets asked repeatedly by retards like you.

File: smug retard.png (205 KB, 656x679)

205 KB PNG

>>7386338
based

>>7380331
>coomer fan art of --current thing-- is the only thing that gets you any traction these days
Creativity is truly dead

>>7390530
it dont matter since the average consumer base lacks any semblance of a human soul as well

>>7390530
The current thing is not coomer fan art of itself, but gained enough traction to be the current thing.
What now chud?

>>7381282
corporations are bad mkay?

>>7390537
Did i have a stroke trying to understand your post or did you have one?

File: PeHmdeth.jpg (46 KB, 1024x860)

46 KB JPG

>>7390574
The original game/cartoon is creative art in it's own right, and if people are making coomer fan art of it then it managed to gain traction and become popular.
Anon's position is self-refuting.

>>7390591
Ah, i get it now, you're just illiterate.

>>7390619
You've just got peasant mindset and think the only thing you can do is post single images on social media.

>>7390629
Sure, you can also reupload memes to get traction on social media.
Maybe even buy bots.
Heck, maybe just straight up upload porn.
Better yet, farm drama or rage bait.
Wow, so many options.

>>7390591
>hmmm? what should I draw today...
>something that will get a lot of likes and interactions...
>ah yes! someone else's creation!
>but what should the drawing be about? hmmm...
>porn! everyone knows that sex sells!
>I am a very creative person full of original ideas!!!

>>7377484
Prease, Engrish.

>>7380331
and people say AI is repetative and generic, good style nontheless

>>7384402
lmao, didn't expect to see my gen here, small world
>>7386422
that was a quick and dirty img2img of a the original painted over in krita to force a bit of colour into it

>>7390756
this but unironically

>>7377484
>genderblob gurofujos

The fact that women are revealing the kind of shit they're truly into, while bitching about men drawing big boobies is utterly hilarious to me.

>>7390713
>the only options in life are to be free-range content cattle for twit tok
Do zoomers just not know things outside of social media exist?

>>7395368
twatter is an easier option than joining the industry though the amount of success from it is involatile , breaking in the industry is extremely hard and requires a mass amount of connections, there's no other place to farm that other than going to art schools OR using social media to talk with industry vets that you bought there courses from/taking private lessons. Even if you do break in the industry, you'll be cattle making marvel or isekai slop. Doesn't help that industry vets rathe be social media/twitter/porn artist.

>>7395388
volatile*

>>7394805
>women are hypocritical assholes that constantly portray themselves as victims while doing/perpetuating the same exact shit
In other news, what is wet.

>>7377470
I'll never understand why so many retards that draw fanart do it so off model. Like its basically just drawing your idealized version of a beautiful women in cosplay.

>>7395610
these types usually fall into it, and their niche audience expects it. half of them are victims of a popularity explosion that occurred earlier that's prevented the from branching out, and the other half have egos and libidos so high it would give any normal person a stroke.

>>7395610
Almost like the reason is in the name. Or, should all artist ever use the same style when make art of a character?

>>7380930
"Children"
Shut the fuck up, dipshit

File: 638E7E74-68F9-4610-9BF7-F(...).jpg (67 KB, 612x642)

67 KB JPG

>>7395663
There's a difference between drawing a character in your style and drawing something so off model that people can't tell who the character is supposed to be. Asking someone to try to loosely stick to established proportions and not tac on elf ears isn't some puritanical stifling of creativity you inbred troglodyte.

>>7384027
saw some bitches seething about bronies taking over mlp a while ago. all I could do was laugh.

>>7395368
>the """real""" option is to be caged content cattle for some publisher
I tried just going inside a publisher, asking for the manager, firmly shake his hand but then i got the police called on me because i misgendered him and called a racist for being white

On social media i can pretend to be anything i want so that the mentally ill will pay me.

>>7395704
NTA, No one said any of that. I get you, but with fanart, if it hits - it hits, Who gives a fuck?

>>7395704
You have a point, but they don't care nor respect anything.
The "fanart" is just an excuse to make their shit appear in the current trend.

One could argue that the copypasted proportions and elf ears are this guy's style.

File: Screenshot_20241210-07250(...).png (664 KB, 1079x926)

664 KB PNG

>>7396195
>this guy's style
Yeah all of his art looks like this, elephantiasis everywhere.
Just be sure to DM him if you use his style

>>7395614
>egos and libidos so high it would give any normal person a stroke.
that's me!

File: 1716775800252912.png (85 KB, 581x582)

85 KB PNG

>>7397273
Wow this shit looks the same

File: 1612309409030.jpg (67 KB, 323x640)

67 KB JPG

>>7397273
"elephantitis" is a lazy way to criticize someone's work, but all his pictures do seriously look like it's the same picture simply with a few detail changes.

I doubt his design is also original and unique enough that it gives him some sort of ownership over anything that might be similar or that no one is allowed to replicate the proportions or the hair style.
What's "his style" even according to him? You can't own body proportions or the genre of pin-up or the generic poses and the same with elf ears and hair styles.
His way of coloring also doesn't strike me as unique or expressive enough; it's purely functional as in serving the purpose of adding color to the picture since he has no real rendering or unique way of portraying colors, shadows, light or else.
All together, sure, maybe it can be considered the semblance of a style purely through repetition and attaching his alias with it, but it can be considered almost arrogant and tasteless to claiming to own something as bland and unrefined as the copypasted pin-ups in poses already drawn to death by every single anime women artist in existence.

The only thing he can intellectually own is his exact subject matter (the big titty girl he draws) and his illustrations, as per doctrine.

To avoid "stealing his style", you'd just need to make the head bigger or regular sized.

>>7389460
and you still couldn't invent a proper answer? pathetic old fart

>>7397684
>What's "his style" even according to him
Hell if I know, his style isn't unique and doesn't exactly pop out as anything special.

>>7397622
thats the lore on this guy?

>>7396191
just put on some lipstick retard.

>>7377499
>le ps1 graphics (overdone at this point)
>le edgy edginess
>le alt notlikeothers girl
>le mental problems

ps1 graphics are actually an excuse to not put effort into the art direction and animation, a true artist appreciates the time it takes to create

>>7380936
>it's consensual
so what's the problem chief?

>>7400999
used goods belong in the dump

>>7381106
i felt bad for the twitter zoomer who never had a good response so here:
sexualizing an aged up child is bad because you're sexualizing a child by proxy, and the result makes the viewer think of the child version
sexualizing an aged down adult is bad too because you're sexualizing a child directly, it's right there on the image

there, it's that easy
(i don't actually believe this though. i think only the actual depiction matters, not some canon shit. otherwise a stickman with text that says "15 y. o." would be child porn)

>>7401035
It ain't even that complex, it's just mixing kid elements into porn in both cases. >>7381514

>>7380936
This is somehow wholesome. I like that.

damn, i really can't wait for porn to be banned so i can pull out a big, fat, juicy, throbbing "i told you so years ago"

>>7395704
I honestly had no idea what character it was until I looked through the thread and it took me a second lol.

>>7401035
>sexualizing an aged up child is bad because you're sexualizing a child by proxy
so sexualized an aged down adult is fine because you're sexualizing an adult by proxy.

>>7401158
no, any possible way a man can sexualize something is bad

>>7401035
Not your zoomer boogeyman, but that's exactly what we're all trying to say. The fact you felt the need to sexualize a canonically underage character at all but mask it as "it's ok she's legal now" is fucking creepy because you just admitted to liking kids. Sadly pornbrained retards like this >>7401158 >>7404022 will never understand.

inb4 "teenagers have sex" or "muh 17 and 18 year old dating" or "adults are aged up children" yesh bro you slapped zz cups on a child

>>7405654
no one cares