Like paintings depicting people fucking. There are some old drawings and stuff and paintings of nude people, but never of them fucking. why is that?
how come you are a stupid gorilla nigger
>>7408624NO ANSWER......i wonder WHO is stupid
>>7408618they are in private collections
>>7408618I have to assume it's because most people don't want to hang porn on their wall. If you're going to make or buy porn, you'll probably want it to be something that's easy to store discreetly, like a paper, magazine, or digital file. What would you do with a big pornographic painting on a canvas? Put it up and take it down every time you jack off?
>>7408649This, museums won't take them and randos won't buy them off of the original owners
>>7408618That's because you are being lied to about history700 false years have been added to our timeline. And the next 1000 years was the millennial reign of Christ. People did not paint porn during that time.Today, we are in Satan's little season, to be deceived until the Great White Throne JudgementDo your research.https://youtu.be/xHcvznRMNVk
>>7408676>700 false years have been addedi call bs, there's no evidence that there were 700 years added, only that there was a time when there was little being written down.that "700 years added" is a lie of satan to make christians lose focus, to throw us off.since Jesus defeated satan, we've been on a continual victory tour.time for us has no bearing, we won.
>>7408618for commercial purposes that would've been concentrated in brothels where sex acts were depicted like burger king menus.
also are you an autistic
>>7408618
>>7408676the millefiori patterns look typically Phoenician, don't they?
>>7409022this painting again...
>>7409022she's gonna fall and he's gonna have a fractured dick
>>7408618try google, retardhttps://www.saatchiart.com/en-pl/battistahttps://www.saatchiart.com/en-pl/jsfaerber
Because people are hypocrites and put you in jail for depicting the truth. Humans are animals who constantly act like they are not.
>>7408676This lecturer's understanding that there was a connection between the Hellenistic world and that of the later Vandals and so on is worth remembering, but maybe not quite as surprising as it sounds. Why wouldn't naval powers retain some skills throughout history that existed outside of local traditions? And with respect to OP's question about Painting, it's possible that many explicit sculptures or bas reliefs were painted.>When asked by one of his generals why he welcomed this group, Alexander replied: "I did not adore him, but that God who hath honoured him with his high priesthood; for I saw this very person in a dream, in this very habit [garment], when I was at Dios in Macedonia, who, when I was considering with myself how I might obtain the dominion of Asia, exhorted me to make no delay, but boldly to pass over the sea thither, for that he would conduct my army, and would give me the dominion over the Persians; whence it is, that having seen no other in that habit, and now seeing this person in it, and remembering that vision, and the exhortation which I had in my dream, I believe that I bring this army under the divine conduct, and shall therewith conquer Darius, and destroy the power of the Persians, and that all things will succeed according to what is in my own mind" (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, Book 11, chap. 8, sec. 5, William Whiston translation, 1981).>Josephus records that Alexander then accompanied the priest into Jerusalem and the temple, where he "offered sacrifice to God, according to the high priest's direction, and magnificently treated both the high priest and the priests."
>>7408618back then people found sexual satisfaction in sex, not in a bunch of drawings lmao
>>7408649tpbp
>>7408649Probably this, as an example there are A LOT of Sargent paintings in private collections without a single photo of them online. If I were to guess pornographic paintings started around mid XX century, with pornography appearing in cinemas and some people making a lot of money from those movies to afford to pay for this kinda of art. And let's not forget that child pornography was a thing back then, no actual penetration because that was illegal, but everything else was game until the late 70s with most films "accidentally" being destroyed in fires and you can bet someone somewhere made paintings of that stuff for someones
>>7408618Coomers are low minded animals, and cannot produce high art. Simple as.
>>7409415>everything else was game until the late 70s with most films "accidentally" being destroyed in firesand that's a good thing
>>7409510>he doesnt know
>>7409415wasn't denmark or sweden or one of those countries known for being a legal cp factory around 60s or 70s? iirc everything was legal for porn
>>7409510It was a very lucrative industry, still is on an individual level
>>7409510did you type this to convince us or to convince yourself?
>>7409927I'm not dirt like you scumbag.
O rly
>>7408618Supposedly by Pál Szinyei Merse, 1867 (Can't remember if I've been able to verify that)
>>7408618Arthur Fischer, 1900 (Again, not sure if that's accurate info)
>>7408618Supposedly from the 19th century
>>7408618Also, plenty of pornographic wall paintings in Pompeiihttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erotic_art_in_Pompeii_and_Herculaneum
