>>7435666
that one doesn't look remotely ai though. how mindbroken are xitter artists

Is this the latest Twitter cheat for artist?
It does look like ai even if it isn't. The unfinished drawing on the bottom looks so much better.

You better record yourself drawing at the computer because AI can fake and train on timelapses
>>7435697
>>7435689
If it's digital it might as well be AI
Return to traditional

>>7435689
mostly non-artist are claiming things are ai, though.

>>7435705
I'm scared of not having the lasso and transform tool irl

>>7435666
If you’re gonna do a traced photo with an anime character drawn in you might as well just use AI since you obviously fucking ran out of ideas

>>7435666
>>7435697
Heavily rendered anime characters look like AI now. And frankly that's good they're being stigmatized, they never actually were visually appealing. Anime (all cartooning) is at its essence is simplification, adding all kinds of effects and rendering detracts from it.

>>7435666
Rendering = AI apparently.
Time to return to cel shading.

The reason these false accusations are so effective is because like it or not animeslop is generic, no shit the AI can catch up and pass tardos who consider the height of expression to be yet another Default MC from some FOTM anime or yet another generic anime slut floating on a void. Can we finally just admit that anime fanart is a completely void medium? And this is coming from someone who has spent thousands collecting manga and anime on DVD and Blu-ray ffs. We just don't need more flavorless oatmeal art.

>>7435986
Before people would just say you photobashed. Now they say you used AI. Jealous beginners will always be jealous beginners that need cope our they would off themselves.

>>7435666
Sus. I don't even have to prove it because he will seppuku his account just like every other guy who attempted to use AI to larp as a Jap

>>7435666
It looks good. It also doesn't look like AI. You'd think the AI schizofoilers would actually spend some time looking at AI gens to learn how to discern it but nope.

>>7435982
>>7435990
>>7435964
Pyw

I for one am glad anime shit is finally torpedoing out of fashion. It's overstayed its welcome about 2 fucking decades now.

File: Yoyi magic of lines.png (2.07 MB, 1503x1782)

2.07 MB PNG

>>7435990
>The reason these false accusations are so effective is because like it or not animeslop is generic,
It became way too accessible for any third world retard with a tablet. Cartooning went from the art of showing the world through ink and line to the ''''art'''' of tracing over templates in Clip Studio Paint.

The slop AIpajeets are shoveling out is pathetic on its face to anybody with even a bit of taste, but if your 'artistic output' consisted of shonen fanart featuring an anime trace-over of a 3D model with a blurred photo as a background, then sure enough stable diffusion probably seems apocalyptic.

>>7436049
Post your shriveled dick and balls once it finally sunk in that teaching over pics of Luffy and Deku was made obsolete by a fucking algorithm you nodraw cuck

>>7436062
Sorry your art is bad. Maybe work on it.

>>7436064
Pyw

>>7436069
I asked first big dog

>>7436075
And I'm telling you to fuck yourself, faggot. Let's see that busted anime art you fucking retard. Or are you too chicken shit, you nodraw tard?

>>7436078
Toning it down will get you more (you)s fyi.

>>7436079
Yeah and drawing might get you out of your embarrassing 7th grade shit scribbles that need to be pre chewed in the form of manga panels but you're not drawing, now are you? You deserve all the pain AI brings your stupid ass.

File: 010287.png (2.53 MB, 1432x1840)

2.53 MB PNG

>distinguish real from fake
desu it's all pixels on a screen

Noo if a painting is rendered flawlessly with great color schemes, composition, and interesting lighting it must be AI and soulless. How will you ever cope that people are better than you? Everyone else's art has no appeal except for the art that you're personally into.

This is how at works. This is how is always worked. Everyone is a hack fraud and everything is AI now.

>>7435666
I don't give a shit if retards think something I drew is ai. I've been accused of it and just ignored them.

>>7435666
Nah, just turn on and off your layers. And then you make fun of them by copying and transform/skew your characters around with some shitpost background music

>you have to draw good so that the normies like it because it's LE realistic but LE animu
>no not like that or it's AI! record your process! and no you cannot draw less than the """"appealing"""" quality or else you suck and no one going to like&subscribe
So i can't draw good and i can't draw bad
>inb4 epic witty reply how i can't draw anyway lol lmao
Maybe i should just do trad and go into politics.

>>7435666
I will keep telling all digital artists are ai users until all of you commit suicide and go mop my floors and take my garbage. Don't care. AI is the future.

>>7436192
wow anon i am offended to death i will now cut my wrists
shit mang you got us
artsisters we losets
bettter quit life while we're ahead

fuck man how can one epic anon be so epically ruthless
fuck man this is brutal
we have been mogged and owned

>>7435697
>This artwork is so good... It must be AI!
>Every AI pics looks like this therefore it must be AI!
>W-what do you mean it's just your artstyle. You can just go grab a different artstyle from Walmart you doofus!

>>7436192
Sounds like you're the one more likely to commit suicide based on your little tantrum.

>>7436191
mah asshole itchy

>>7436047
>You photobashed! Therefore it doesn't count!
>You used vegetation / decal brushes! It doesn't count! You should've drawn each of those intricate details by hand!
>You used 3D! This entire finished artwork doesn't count!
>Y-you traced over AI! This entire finished artwork doesn't count! (provides no proof)
>You used color picker! All of these colors doesn't count since you dont pick your own color!
What's so annoying is that you could ask the same beglets to go ahead and try everything above that they considered cheating but I'm sure none of them are able to replicate anything near what established / experienced artists are capable of making. They're mad at pajeets but they 100% cannot achieve whatever the artists they tried to cancel even with those 'cheating' methods.

>>7436192
I remember there's this one AI schizo in some discordtranny server who'd just call out everything as AI. So he got tagged as the resident schizo.

>>7435705
>Return to traditional
I see trad artists being accused of tracing over AI all the time

File: 2r4fztv4bl481.jpg (196 KB, 2000x900)

196 KB JPG

>>7435666
you can just use AI drawing generated in the second monitor and claim it's original. it's not that hard to pull it off, even with screen recording and face cam. are zoomers this stupid?

>>7435705
Nah. They'll just accuse you of tracing over a generated picture. There's no way of appeasing witchhunt faggots

File: Mimicry - When Animals Co(...).gif (1.98 MB, 640x360)

1.98 MB GIF

>>7435705
the fact people are willing to take timelapses reminds me of animal mimicry in nature.

File: naga run.png (295 KB, 382x332)

295 KB PNG

>>7435986
I for one welcome this. 90s style needs to make a comeback

>>7436209
Notice how it's never really skilled/successful artists who go on these crusades against AI, it's always nodraws and beg-tiers with tiny followings

>>7435697
you people are so fucking retarded
it was never about art or targeted artists
they're chasing after the ragebait reaction money
what better way to get Twitter royalty than to tell everyone "this is an AI drawn picture"
these other fucking retards get instant dopamine and forever chase lightning after finding 5 dollars in their account

>>7436326
Sexo with naga

At least he handled it well instead of committing seppuku. From what I seen this is the usual artist response though. Actual AI users will cry they're being attacked and hide the comments without posting sufficient proof

>>7435986
based

>>7436361
I said so in my post, nigger.

>>7435666
2 screen fags will just have a version on another screen and record the remake as they do in most other digital fields like computer music making, coding, 3d and so on.

File: 1000049716.png (1.35 MB, 1216x832)

1.35 MB PNG

>>7435986
>Don't worry, artsisters! AI only generates semi-realism slop it will never get ahold of styles from 90s Anim-ACK!

File: file.png (3.61 MB, 2500x1650)

3.61 MB PNG

>>7436326
>slayer
Funny you bring that one up considering the artist used AI for his art book

>>7437532
how do you guys have histrionic reactions so bad that you make up something to get angry at

>>7437645
>types anime screencap into his prooompt
>"HAHA! ITS OVER ALL OF YOU FAGS!"
It must've been the onions.

>>7435666
By proving the art is not AI, will it make it not look like AI?

File: file.png (671 KB, 711x950)

671 KB PNG

>>7437542

>>7437542
>>7438070
based
you know AI is the inevitable future when industry legends are already on it

>>7438070
I don't get it. I don't ee anything wrong with the things you pointed out.

File: -hnmjnz.jpg (193 KB, 1080x1080)

193 KB JPG

>>7436326
I love seeing people mention Slayers. May it never die

>>7438079
If you are a good artist and using this it would just look embarrassing for you, getting people to think your older work was also done with AI.

>>7438126
retard

>>7438126
You said this because you saw that video, but that video doesn't prove he wasn't tracing.

File: 20250109_172912.jpg (26 KB, 317x317)

26 KB JPG

>>7438140
Don't be mean to me

>>7438070
I can tell without even opening the preview image.

File: never change ''''nona'''''.png (311 KB, 1000x636)

311 KB PNG

>>7437532
>artsisters
>le owo kawaii anime picture

>people constantly trying to pull "gotchas" on real artists with claims their work is AI, even when it's just a for fun/free post
>actual AIsloppers just spam their shit constantly, open patreons, sell shit, etc and nobody gives a fuck about complaining
Why?

>>7439364
Actually why dont the witchhunters just go to these actual pajeetposters

>>7439364
Because most of the artist 'community' are shitty, scummy, toxic crabs

>>7439373
Because they know AIjeets can't be shamed, they literally do not give a fuck. So they punch down and pick on artists instead. See >>7439375

>>7439375
Unironically this. It's worth mentioning, though, that most 'artists' are either angsty teens or people who still think they're angsty teens. It's not exactly a hobby that attracts friendly well-adjusted people.

>>7439379
Truth

>>7439375
I also wonder if it's a situation where nobody is jealous of AIfags, but despite claims to the contrary, a lot of people are still jealous of actual artists. Calling out an artist's work as being AI "knocks the artist down a peg" and pulls the mask off their supposed skill to expose it as a sham.

File: 1716871554637077.jpg (3.42 MB, 2480x3543)

3.42 MB JPG

>>7439417
since i got a computer almost 20 years ago i've seen people shitting on artists but no one hate artists more than artists
non artists always go as
>this is good but i wont pay for it
>i can do something better... if i try
>i know someone that draws really good
>imagine if you had the same talent for (career)
>as long as you keep it as a hobby
but artists?
>this is traced
>meh, you are copying (artist)
>you probably practice like a robot
>your art is sooo technical, i prefer more soul
>you take style too serious, try to apply more fundies
>i know more art than you, it dosnt matter if i can apply what im talking about, im better
>oh that is so simple even i can do that, i don get why they are so popular (this one is the funniest to me, they are never able to replicate simple styles)
>they dont deserve their following, is not special
>this person probably is a bad person
>did you hear what (artist) did? oh boy get ready for the gossip
>this looks like AI to me

>>7439417
Which wouldn't be a problem, people passing off AI as their own deserve to be exposed. The trouble is, for some reason, militant anti-AI faggots seem to be fucking terrible at actually spotting it

>>7439425
Don't take it seriously. Lots of people just love to shitpost for (You)s and artists seem to be a good target.

>ignore the retards screeching on twitter
>go back to drawing
>post your art for your followers
>ignore the retards screeching on twitter
>go back to drawing
>post your art for your followers
>ignore the retards screeching on twitter

>>7439456
Until the screeching retards come for (you).

>>7439467
In that case

>ignore the retards screeching on twitter
>go back to drawing
>post your art for your followers
>ignore the retards screeching on twitter
...

The future is taking your shit and smearing it on canvas. AI could never and as a bonus, it's a commentary on the absolute state of contemporary art.

File: GhNDF3IbgAEvzKY.jpg (522 KB, 1543x2048)

522 KB JPG

AI is better than 99% of artists at this point
By the end of 2025 its going to be better than 99.9% of them

>>7439364
>people constantly trying to pull "gotchas" on real artists with claims their work is AI, even when it's just a for fun/free post
>actual AIsloppers just spam their shit constantly, open patreons, sell shit, etc and nobody gives a fuck about complaining.
Because they openly say they use AI, you see Twitter artists screeching at AI when a particular AI piece becomes popular. Most anti-AI people will just block/mute and go on with their day. AI consumers will still pay to consume AI; it is an "I consent, I consent, I don't" situation. What these artists seething about is AI prompters stealing their potential art clients.

File: 8765432.jpg (62 KB, 1142x884)

62 KB JPG

>>7435666
If people accuse me of using ai I will simply ignore them and keep drawing.

>>7439559
>Because they openly say they use AI
There's plenty that don't and when someone calls them out for it in the comments they just hide it.

>What these artists seething about is AI prompters stealing their potential art clients.
Not only that but in their own exact style, who wouldn't seethe over that?

File: 1730291763745730.png (787 KB, 803x1200)

787 KB PNG

>>7439364
Because we are having fun. Simple as.
This is a new tech and we are spending our time with it instead of going around trying to accuse people of using whatever tool they are using for their stuff.
It's literally that easy.

>>7439584
Did you prompt this?

File: 1720038243517772.jpg (221 KB, 1080x1344)

221 KB JPG

>>7439586
No but here is something I genned. Mind you I had to use photoshop to touch up on a few things.
But the thing is: AI artists are on their lane and enjoying themselves too much to fight in pointless wars.

>>7439592
tranny

File: 8DAEA272-E75C-4C99-9DF3-8(...).jpg (10 KB, 198x255)

10 KB JPG

>>7439383
>It's not exactly a hobby that attracts friendly well-adjusted people.

>>7439605
And a lot of artists absolutely despise him.

To them ai is the perfect tool to scam people with and nothing more. You can't blame them. They are from India afterall.

>>7439592
>ai artists are on their lane and enjoying themselves too much to fight in pointless wars
AI is to art what gacha are for games

>>7439554
Pose this exact same character with the exact same outfit doing something else. You can’t.

As long as AI remains a prompt gacha its useless even for slop since even the trashiest of slop demands a minimum level of consistency from point to point.

>>7439554
That AI art is better than 99.9% of AI art. People can make decent shit with AI, but to say that's anywhere near common is laughable. Hell, even if you look at the rest of that dude's gens, almost all of them are complete dogshit. You picked the single good one.

File: 1715052816504680.jpg (112 KB, 850x1271)

112 KB JPG

>>7439627
You definitely can and should use AI if it helps you achieve your vision

Fuck off to /g/
You don't draw. You are typing prompts into a text field. Ai is probably doing that for you as well.
It's cool if that makes you happy but I can prompt my own slop. I don't want to see yours.

It's going to get so much worse at the end of the month

>>7439364
>>7439375
>>7439383
Kill yourself
>>7439417
This. We just hate evil bastards that claim to be righteous gods for doing fucking nothing but taking advantage of other's hard work and claiming they did it all. The techbros aren't been credited for inventing AI, the shitty grifting promptnigger is, or is forcing everyone to believe they are gods for making a sloppa image exist.

>>7439554
The cave painting of a bear 20000 years ago is objectively better than noise.

>>7439835
You realize the guy you agreed with is disagreeing with you, right?

>>7439841
Wrong post, didn't care enough to repost.

>>7439758
why is that?

>>7439867
Probably referring to the NAI update

File: 2502.jpg (217 KB, 1500x2000)

217 KB JPG

>>7439554
If a human said he drew that i would still call it trash
And I don't even blindly hate anime shit, that image just looks like overproduced digital trash; it's something you'd see on a fucking nightcore """""music"""" video on youtube

>>7439658
Ok smartass. How do I get my Waifu to look like this then? Convince an idiot.

File: 2498.png (3.03 MB, 1024x1536)

3.03 MB PNG

>>7439554
Right hand isn't even close to holding the gun correctly + it looks like shit
Honestly these models have only gotten worse as fidelity has gone up; some of the old shit they used to make when they were barley functional was more interesting

>>7439841
I'm the one who made the comment about knocking down a peg. I'm not saying it's the right mindset, but the fact that artists have an actual skill and have actual fans who appreciate that skill makes the average AIfag seethe to no end.

>>7435666
/trad/ artist immune to all of these bullshit accusation it seems

>>7439928
Here is a quick guide
https://rentry.org/stuffyai

File: IMG_0987.jpg (63 KB, 463x501)

63 KB JPG

>>7439939
I always hated 95.75% of digital art, especially stuff that obviously was never physically sketched in the first place
Now this AI shit, while obviously detrimental to to the craft as a whole, does make me feel somewhat vindicated for despising digital art all these years and finally seeing them meltdown
Am i cruel and petty for thinking this way? Yeah, but it still gives me satisfaction

>>7439939
>overproduced digital slop, traced with a tablet over a 3D model by a SEAnigger, result = badly drawn anime girl in void
>overproduced digital slop, randomly shat out by a machine after a prompt typed out by a pajeet on his feces-stained keyboard, result = badly drawn anime girl in void

It wasn't art then and it isn't art now.

>>7439951
larp

>>7439658
Yo can you gen those titties in my mouth? tyvm

>>7439951
If anything digital art are the one who fueled thesr entire AI shit. Besides, like you said, 95% of digital art are not qualified to be called as art.
Imagine drawing fotm character pinup based on some cosplayer foreshortening pose, slap a value layer and dropping overlay layers and call it an art.

>>7439867
GPU circulation

>>7439968
This problem is entirely fueled b the consumer i.e. the almighty demand, and artists who do not not care for art, lack any sort of integrity but are simply "hustling".
We get fotm pinups because that's what makes the most likes, gets the most attention and money.
If the most successful type of art was gore or child porn you would see everyone just do that.

And you will have this in any genre, whether digital or trad, because a content creator is a mind slave to the consumers.

>>7439964
As a pig ? Maybe

>>7439985
Nah, as someone who can actually draw

File: IMG_1317.jpg (69 KB, 688x742)

69 KB JPG

>>7439990
O rly?

>>7440026
Hee hee

>>7439984
>AI slop learn about pinup porn
>AI slop generating pinup porn for free
>gooners lean more towards AI because gooners gonna goon
>pinup porn artists got replaced and forced to either create actual art and become actual artists or work on mcdonalds drive thru window
Wait does this mean AI is good because it filter fake artists?

You aren't replacing popular artists. You are helping them to get even bigger.
The artist that you use a style LORA of gets all the credit. I doubt there are many people left that don't know about ai. Nobody thinks that's your work and the retards that do, deserve to get scammed.
There are people that made bank with ai images and there are artists that are having meltdowns over it. Those pinup artists on Twitter have been in it for years while you spam on a fresh account with 5 followers.

>>7439984
You realize that's why there was so much religious art and portraiture art of nobility back in the day, right? Even most of these FOTM artists have their own studies and personal works which aren't said FOTM art.

>>7440026
this is a good drawing lol

>>7440032
>is AI good?
Not really. It's like giving guns to kids.
>does it filter fake artists?
Ye.
>>7440128
Sure, but you should also realize the scale of artists of today compared to back then and how fast art circulates.

>>7439635
>As long as AI remains a prompt gacha its useless even for slop since even the trashiest of slop demands a minimum level of consistency from point to point.
This. Literally all you have to do is just draw your character in the exact same outfit in a few different angles/poses/backgrounds, and you're AI-proof

>>7439951
pyw tho

>>7439613
They would, anyone that content and positive about life is bound to arouse hatred among inadequates

>>7439835
>We just hate evil bastards that claim to be righteous gods for doing fucking nothing but taking advantage of other's hard work and claiming they did it all. The techbros aren't been credited for inventing AI, the shitty grifting promptnigger is, or is forcing everyone to believe they are gods for making a sloppa image exist.
this but porn niggers also

>>7436323
Programs timelapse automatically if you click the thing when creating a new project.

File: Screenshot 2025-01-16 195931.png (1.12 MB, 671x934)

1.12 MB PNG

Do you make better art than the schizos over at Local Diffusion General on /g/?

>>7440824
What artists did he use in his dataset to get that result? The lowest /ic/ beg is better than the guys on /g/ because they don't draw at all.

File: Screenshot 2025-01-16 195912.png (2.03 MB, 1505x936)

2.03 MB PNG

>>7440916
>He didn't draw it himself!!!
So? Nobody outside of this places cares. Normies dont care, they want to see pretty/cool pictures. If you can't provide pictures that are better than what AI can put out there's literally no merit to your work.

File: 1669717051846668.png (27 KB, 400x400)

27 KB PNG

>>7440929
you didn't cheat the audience you cheated yourself
come rain come shine i remain happy doing my silly doodles
while you grind trillion prompts producing soulless slop for the normoid masses
you've lost before you even started
sad!

>>7440929
>Normies dont care
Neither do I care about them and they don't care about you.
Back to /g/ with you. Where do you think you are?

>>7440960
A board where nobody actually draws and is only here to complain

>>7440989
>*answers the rhetorical question*

>>7440960
>Neither do I care about them
There are constant self-promo and shilling threads on /ic/. Saying that artists dont care about the people that view their art is pure cope.

Go ahead and become a millionaire with your ai images. Money seems to be all you care about. Why come here to seethe?

>>7435666
>Better start recording your process at this point
lmao recordings can be faked and people have already been caught doing it. The only viable proofs is drawing live, which I've done for years on picarto because I'm not a hack that needs to "gather references".

Nobody really cares if you use ai. What pisses people off are :
>artists that dont admit they are using ai
>no-draw prompters that pretend to draw
>people that use style LORAs to mimic popular artists

File: seed86561.png (387 KB, 512x512)

387 KB PNG

>>7440929
>>7441036
You're completely right.
But why incessantly post here in an attempt to try and make people mad by spamming AI slop and try to insult people?
For the usual 20 faggots who shill their shit on here and are starved for recognition and imaginary numbers to farm ego, there are countless others who are having fun drawing and want to pursue the act of drawing, talk about drawing and actual art and not simply consume pretty pictures.

Objectively, the only "normies" who appreciate AI slop are 3rd world brownoids taking it so they can sell it on merchandise since that's already what they do with real art.

The real skill is making technically unappealing art (art that doesn't appeal to the average normies for being "pretty") and it still be appreciated by an audience, because of what it represents and not for being a piece of consumable media.

If we go by
>but normies only want to consume pretty pictures
that statement is instantly beaten by porn.
So, no amount of cool and pretty AI pictures will ever stand a chance against the sloppiest, most diffused, anatomical nightmare of an anime girl with her tits out floating in a sloppy void.
Or just a stickman with rendered titties.

i dont even know why is called "AI" when this tech is incapable of learning like the people who use it. wich is more funny is that normies use AI to generate "beautiful astronaut women on space" while the giga/begs/ that gave up on art are the ones that went schizo about it are the ones generating anime slop