Time to strut our stuff in front of carrierlets
The russian “carrier” if you can even call it that is out of commission and most likely permanently.
>>198984216Shut the fuck up, you are small fly compared to them
>SwitzerlandWhat
>>198984216>making your entire class of ship irrelevant since 1958heh nothing personal kid
why R.I.P.?
>>198985003Already turned into scrap.
>>198984216>ramp and LHA fagdisgusting>>198985003You sent the Foch to a scrapyard.
>>198984216Our carrier burn and out of order so remove us from picture.
>>198984238>>198985164I'm just going to update it.
>>198985214Nice.
>>198985214You can remove all of those who aren't CATOBARs.
>>198984216>finlandWhat are they doing here? Leading an air attack an ocean away from home? Do they even have enough aircraft for a carrier?
>>198985434Hello smarty.
>>198985434>doesn't know the hyper war
>>198984281switzerlake memes
>>198985301Then I would have to add the new Chinese one and I'm not ready to do that yet.
>>198985434
>>198985214Add Iran's nigger rigged drone carrier converted from an oil tanker.
>>198984216>rampsAbsolutely embarrassing
>>198986185They can still operate F-35Bs.
Can someone post the russian carrier insides they're like a Warhammer space hulk with living walls and shit it's crazy kino.
>>198986271Nothing like that. I see some photo from kuznetsov they seems normal.
>>198986271>>198986369Admiral Kuznetsov vs. Chinese carrier of the same class.
>>198986271
>>198986443And?!
>>198986581Your shit is old and busted. The Chinese are far better at basic maintenance and don't let their ships rot down to the waterline.
>>198984238This "carrier" is bigger than your country.
>>198986791the baltics are an unsinkable HATO death carrier and are as close to moscow as pookraine that you seem to care so much about
>>198986765And?
>>198986864Give them time, it takes a great deal to liberate as much land as NATO occupies
I don't like carriers that much, I prefer destroyers packed full of missiles
>>198986791ThisRussia. Carrier can carry 9000000 AC 130 nuclear missiles that can't be shot down and runs on super secret super fuel Russian navy has never lost a battle in history
>>198986369Normal for you
>>198987119Not only.
>>198987136Are there African carriers?
>>198986369Ivan.. I...
>>198987156No idea.
>The ship has been out of service and in repairs since 2018. The repair process has been hampered by accidents, embezzlement of funds, and other setbacks.[10] After the floating drydock PD-50 sank in Kola Bay (Murmansk) in an accident that killed one worker in October 2018, the ship was towed to Sevmorput Yard No 35.[11] In another mishap in December 2019, a major fire killed at least one worker and injured ten others.[12] In June 2022, the ship was transferred to a drydock at the 35th Ship Repair Plant in Murmansk,[10] where it remained until February 2023. The current projection is that repairs will be completed and the ship will be transferred back to the Russian Navy sometime in 2024, however this may be pushed back to 2025 if issues arise during overhaul and testing.[13][14]
>>198987211put it out of its misery ffs
>>198987309this would be sensible, but Russia can't do that for propaganda reasons, because they wouldn't be on the official 'countries with carriers' list anymore (even tho factually they haven't been for a while)
>>198987211Main purpose of any military expenses all around globe is stole tax payers money. Nothing strange.
Danish government be like:>"We should have a supercarrier too for our new F-35 fighter jets"The navy replies:>"What the fuck why? Just give us cruisers and destroyers so we can stop submarines"And the government goes:>"But carriers look really cool and project strength. We'll commission one as soon as budget allows"And the army goes>"Who's going to build it?"Government goes:>"We'll just reopen all the Danish shipyards we decommissioned in the 80's and make shipbuilding a preference course for the technical schools"And everyone who knows how expensive and difficult shipbuilding is goes:>"That's completely insane, how long would all of this take, realistically?"Government:>"Probably 20-40 years"
>>198984216It ain't ww2 anymore. Carriers are boring
>>198987389cope>>198987391a carrier would be a huge waste of money for Denmark, you should get submarines first
>>198987344the mysterious russian sovl
>>198987430Yes but the government is retarded.That's what happens when you let the socialists lead. Their idea of an army is that is just need to look good (preferably on paper where it doesn't actually cost anything), but the actual plan is that it'll never be used. It's the exact same thing they did in 1940. Same government, by the way.
>>198987552Stealth carrier
>>198987573kinda same here, but it's getting a but better lately
>>198984216We are developing an aircraft carrier that works both as an airport out at sea and as a mobile airport on the ground. We are currently in initial testing and development stageshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_FNVndayq8#t=945
>>198986962True. Two more weeks.
>>198988142>The pentagon refuses to comment on Ukraine's shelling of Belgorod... might take two and a half weeks, actually
Hi
>>198984216we are coming for your fleets. fear the undefeated swiss aircraft carrier
>>198985164Was the Admiral Korahdus only one you had? :O Yanks have eleven.
>>198986982That's because you are forbid to build carriers and nuclear subs.
>>198988891no we aren't, stop talking out of your ass.
>>198987197No, there is not. Rusty, stinky, shitty and sinky is normal only in Ryssiän ships.
Carriers? are you guys posting from the 20th century?It's all about Manta Rays nowhttps://www.google.com/maps/place/34%C2%B009'13.0%22N+119%C2%B012'31.1%22W/@34.1536111,-119.2086389,723m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m4!3m3!8m2!3d34.1536111!4d-119.2086389?entry=ttu
>>198987389It would be, if globe didn't include Ryssiä. Why don't you just keep your tax money out of Putler's pocket? What makes you so eager to give your money to oligharks?
>>198987391You should order your carrier from Finnish shipyards.
>>198989070Looks like a wrecked trimaran.
>>198987552That makes more pollution than whole Finland combined. Why don't ecoterrorists sink that ship, instead of sitting in road creating traffic jams?
>>198987430True. War most useless spend of efforts.
>>198989506It looks cool, though
>>198989383
>>198984216Italian ships are always the best>>198988201Hi
>>198988945Yes you are. You performed so weak at last war, that they took your toys away.
>>198989597Imagine seeing this. Submechanophobia
>>198989772no we aren't. There are restrictions on the number of soldiers we can have (370k iirc) and we signed a treaty not to have nuclear weapons, but no such limitation exists for cariers or nuclear-propelled subs.
>>198988142"Celebratory porridge" gets me every time
