[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: norf.jpg (471 KB, 1003x1060)
471 KB
471 KB JPG
Ngl I kinda like some modern northern architecture
>>
>>200124661
looks garbage and soulless
>>
>>200124661
It's fine when it mixes both traditional and contemporary. Unfortunately we mostly get soulless white and grey cubes.
>>
>>200125967
This
>>
>>200124661
Shits ass
>>
>>200125941
Perfect for a German
>>
File: gdansk.jpg (2.08 MB, 1920x1440)
2.08 MB
2.08 MB JPG
>>200124661
love it too
>>
>>200124661
I would accept bottom left.
>>
>>200124661
>>200126407
Nice!
>>
>>200124661
Yeah this style looks pretty nice
>>
>>200124661
Agreed. Just approaching the old silhouettes does so much to increase the aesthetic quality of a building.
>>
>>200124661
>Ngl I kinda like some modern northern architecture
Words that can be said only by German.
>>
>>200129446
People who live in dilapidated shacks shouldn't throw stones
>>
>>200128808
Red sandstone makes me cum, piss and smile
>>
>>200124661
>>200126407
>>200128808
These buildings are better than brutalist or functionalist concrete blocks. But they're still not beautiful.
>>
They’re alright. Something about them seems soulless though and I can’t put my finger on it
>>
File: 1N6A6294_HIMMEL.jpg (3.32 MB, 5555x3703)
3.32 MB
3.32 MB JPG
>>200124661
I like the mixed zoning buildings that's becoming more and more common. Really gives some life to what would otherwise have been dead streets with nothing happening
>>
>>200129975
Might just be that they're new
>>
>>200130085
Not that mixed zoning was a new thing, our old brutalist blocks had businesses on ground floor
>>
>>200129892
True there are many styles more beautiful but those buildings are a good mixture between being aesthetic and being producable on a large scale.
>>200129975
They are brand new. They didn't have the built up patina of older buildings.
>>
>>200126392
>>200129446
>>200125941
>>200129892
>>200129975
>I neeeed slopp and gold
People who talk about "soul" are 10 outa 10 times heavily gay, perfumed bottom fags.
>>
>>200130136
They were in a small minority here. Picrel is newly constructed as well and follows the old formula. You would at most have a corner shop in a neighbourhood of 20 houses and 1000 people
>>
>>200130265
I like even our concrete commie-blocks more than what in your OP-pic.
>>
>>200130319
Yeah a lot more of them now
>>
>>200130265
They're zesty
>>
>>200130265
It doesn't have to be gilded, but I would prefer something like this.
>>
File: s11.jpg (479 KB, 1920x1280)
479 KB
479 KB JPG
Living here would be very pleasant.
>>
File: Abb.-1_kl-1.jpg (197 KB, 1000x754)
197 KB
197 KB JPG
>>200130552
I mean it's cool to preserve that... but do you still dress like this?
>>
>>200130085
Nice
>>
>>200130741
What are those ugly towers
>>
File: Sankt-Eriksområdet.jpg (399 KB, 1250x833)
399 KB
399 KB JPG
>>200130819
I wouldn't want to. But I would want to live in a neighborhood like this.
>>
>>200124661
one of the SHIT attributes of those styles is the flat facades. they're basically geometric shapes with windows painted on them. that is how they design them. it's architecture for skillless hacks.
>>
>>200128808
ground level: nice
upper levels: FLAT with a bit of trim
>>200130085
and more flat facades. tolerable, I guess. the balconies give it some depth.
>>200130319
THAT is worse than commie block. it's commie block with lip stick.
>>
>>200131510
But, I don't want fake flowers an pissing boys on my building.
You like women just with bolted on tits and makeup?
>>
>>200131610
no, I like boys pissing on the passersby
>>
>>200130878
Sweden Trade Center
>>
>>200130819
Honestly, I *wish* we still did, at least a modified version of it.
Vests on men look good, so do proper dress shoes, jackets, etc. It's a shame to be so limited by our current simplified fashions.
>>
>>200131510
Protruding decorative elements will increase the costs. But if you are the Bauherr (owner of the building) you can pay for it.
>>200131597
>upper levels: FLAT with a bit of trim
See above.
>>
>>200132086
It has to be really hot in that building, white is better for cooling
>>
>>200132054
>at least a modified version of it.
This. Due to my job I wear suits quite often and they aren't uncomfortable at all (a common disadvantage ascribed to them) but they are pretty standardized fashionwise. Even "quirky" suits quickly become very similar.
>>
>>200132134
Slate is love; slate is live
>>
File: 43242.jpg (217 KB, 1210x911)
217 KB
217 KB JPG
>>200124661
they build that here too, I must say I like it, Hansa heritage should never be forgotten
>>
File: Rostock_Plattenbauten.jpg (415 KB, 1024x768)
415 KB
415 KB JPG
>>200133179
Fun fact: in the city of Rostock the local GDR urban planers built the prefabricated buildings with a hanseatic theme.
>>
>>200133179
Nice
>>200133607
Kek, yeah they started to do that in the 80s... in Berlin they made some Plattenbau-Classizism
>>
>>200133607
based, I heard that Rostock had to be quickly expanded after WW2 as after losing Stettin, DDR was actually left without any big port city
>>
>>200133179
First thing that came to my mind when it comes to modern northern architecture.

Gdansk is full of this and it's actually pretty looking desu.
>>
File: Screenshot_4.jpg (367 KB, 1519x746)
367 KB
367 KB JPG
>>200133607
our gommies did that too, maybe not as fancy tho
>>
Can someone tell finnish architects its okay now to build something else than boxes.
>>
>>200134159
boxes are already a Finnish tradition, instead of hating it, start appreciating it and make it your trademark

if Italians could make a badly planned leaning tower their most recognizable attraction then everything is possible
>>
>>200134191
Maybe early functionalism is style that defined our nation but those buildings had round shapes atleast.
>>
>>200133816
Yeah socialist classicism is often pretty nice.
>>200134059
It's very interesting that on one hand communism has the internationl approach but also tries to elevate local styles (when they play nice with the Party).
>>
>>200130819
Problem is that modern architects threw away everything that we learned pre the 20th century. You don't have to build exact copies of older buildings but you should incorporate things we learned. There's a reason why people like older buildings so much; they follow conventions that humans instinctively like when it comes to proportions, colour, textures, and street layouts. Architects should build buildings and cities that people want to live in. Beautiful buildings and cities makes people's lives better and we also want to preserve and take better care of those buildings and cities, which is also better for the environment long-term.

But many modern architects don't care about that. They care more about being "innovative" and getting attention, when they should see themselves more as craftspeople.
>>
>>200134059
Thats pretty well done desu
>>
>>200134667
>>200134592
we had more of that, pic rel is also from the 1980s
>>
>>200134744
I don't know how it worked in DDR but here in the communist era most commieblocks weren't built by the state, but by "housing cooperatives" which were associations of people who raised money for construction of a building with apartments for themselves, so they also had pretty wide autonomy in terms of architecture of the houses. In 99% of cases they just built regular rectangular grey commieblocks because they were the cheapest and demand for new housing was huge but in few cases they went for something more peculiar.
>>
>>200134666
Checked but architects mainly just follow the instructions of their clients. There are only a few that can design a building and have it realized entirely on their own.
>>200134744
Nice
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (135 KB, 960x620)
135 KB
135 KB JPG
>>200124661
Top needs more trim detail, like on the edges of the corners and between buildings, maybe between each floor, something around the windows would be nice too.

>>200130552
This looks much better. The problem modern architecture has is throwing out all the knowledge of what makes a building look good and just being cheap as hell and trying to put a marketing spin on it of being sleek or new or stylish.

>>200132086
Senseless shapes added to the wall just looks ugly. It's not like there's even a consistent design between the floors.
>>
>>200134870
>Checked but architects mainly just follow the instructions of their clients
No they don't. I'm an engineer working in construction and most clients have no idea what they want and don't really care. They might give some loose guidelines but most of it is up to the architects because that's what they're paid to do.

The problem is with the universities because architecture has basically become an arts degree and the students spend most of uni "experimenting" and "finding their voice". I know because I dropped out of the architecture program after year 1 and got a degree in construction engineering instead.
>>
>>200135171
>The problem is with the universities because architecture has basically become an arts degree
it's okay, but why they just cannot follow art guidelines people like, so baroque, rennaissance, historicism, and not fucking boring modernism all the time?
>>
>>200124661
2 and 3 are kinda kino 1 is really ugly
>>
File: 1690990683716144.png (52 KB, 1231x665)
52 KB
52 KB PNG
>>200131510
Makes building and maintenance a lot cheaper and less places that could cause issues. It's one of the reasons plain buildings were really popular
>>200132009
>oh shit mr. Swed Trade Center get down, it's a Danish plane
>>
>>200134833
That's interesting. Could be nice to have such housing cooperatives today.
>>
>>200135674
they still exist here though they work more like corporations that do both managing already existing buildings and building new ones, but selling apartments in the free market. There are also cooperatives that work in the "old" way (so the buyer only contributes a small part of the overall price of the apartment, like 20% at once and the rest is paid in installments for 10-20 years but without interests so it's much cheaper than mortgage in bank) but they're rare because they lose competition for building plots with real estate developers
>>
>>200135114
>maybe between each floor, something around the windows
so senseless shapes
>Senseless shapes added to the wall
"Noooooo not like this"

Fellings driven fags should kys
>>
File: enköpings stadshotell.jpg (688 KB, 1025x1200)
688 KB
688 KB JPG
i hate it
>>
>>200135935
kek at the EU flag, chuds will have someone to blame at least
>>
>>200135875
>they're rare because they lose competition for building plots with real estate developers
That sucks. I guess one solution would be to make a political decision to set aside some of the land for such projects. But dunno how zoning works over there and if it would be possible even if there was political will to do such a thing.
>>
>>200135935
The bottom one looks pretty nice
>>200135968
Seems to be a hotel, not that that'd stop chuds kek
>>
>>200124661
I actually like drab, grey commieblocks but that is because I'm from the balkans and it's always kinda warm there with short winters. Since there is a lot of greenery and parks around the buildings you kinda get a comfy urban jungle anime feel.
Living here in the north I definitely understand why locals dread such architecture. It's not suitable to the climate
>>
>>200136250
That's what I would tell the finn above.
Sunshine or nice nature work wonder with simple grand modernism
>>
>>200124661
Looks fine. It solves many of the problems of contemporary designs (lack of good materials like wood, stone, brick, bronze, etc; overuse of glass, steel and conrete; colorless or heavily desaturated design; trying to eliminate shadows by making everything white, shiny and/or reflective, generally cold, lifeless, industrial designs; tendency to approach the extremes of traditionalism or avant garde architecture; lack of regional identity or integration with surrounding neighborhood)
>>
File: c.jpg (1.39 MB, 3606x1625)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB JPG
>>200131597
>it's commie block with lip stick.
No, that would be this from here, lol

That building looks like a proper brick apartment
>>
>>200135270
expensive and requires use of specialized craftsmen (basically gommunism DDDDDD:)
>>
File: tokyo-danchi-demise13.jpg (1.01 MB, 2400x1600)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB JPG
commie block :/
commie block, Japan :O
>>
>>200137514
Japanese cities are not necessary pretty but they have a distinct look which counter-balances the ugliness
Certainly beats the grey blocks here anyway
>>
>>200137833
>they have a distinct look which counter-balances the ugliness
it's called "maintenance"
>>
>>200124661
looks very soulless but its better than the CUUUUBES shit, I give you that
>>
>>200137833
>>200137986
And that's an old abandoned building about to be demolished.
About as dilapidated as it gets in Japan.
>>
File: Gbg_Vasa_15_17.jpg (1.33 MB, 2848x1896)
1.33 MB
1.33 MB JPG
>>200131610
Pic rel has no real artistic elements, only simple geometry composed in an aesthetic way.
>>
>>200137986
It is not just maintenance, Japanese cities (at least the largest ones) look nothing like the well maintained European counterparts
They are much more densely populated with different architecture styles all over often within a single street
Very chaotic and I dont think pretty is a good way to describe it but it is very distinct and definitely has its own character
>>
>>200138181
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKUBYGwoW3A
>>
>>200134744
>>200133607
these are kino
>>
File: preview.jpg (90 KB, 563x375)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>200124661
>Flag
>Likes nu-hansa style
Of course
>>
>>200132009
>make twin towers
>call them a trade center

What did they mean by that?
>>
File: im-61317439.jpg (169 KB, 1299x867)
169 KB
169 KB JPG
>>200130207
>producable on a large scale
19th century buildings were also mass produced.
>>
>>200124661
Bottom left looks cool
>>
>>200138857
Yes and mass produced buildings back then had a better character than the "luxury" stuff these days



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.