[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 47s.png (221 KB, 1165x1200)
221 KB
221 KB PNG
cold war be like:
>uuuh guys I don't think giving our biggest enemy Russia control over half of europe was a good idea
retarded westernoids
>>
What other options did they even have?
>>
>>200160834
>retarded westernoids
blame angloids for supporting soviets
>>
>>200160872
>What other options did they even have?
Supporting germans and push soviets beyond urals?
>>
>>200160915
Why not occupy the Germans first and then launch Operation Unthinkable?
>>
>>200160962
That would also been better option than the current timeline.
>>
>>200160962
that's the true good ending
>>
>>200160872
could have just let us destroy the Soviets and then nuke us
>>
>>200160834
>>200160872
We should have nuked Moscow during the brief time when we were the only ones with nuclear weapons
>>
>>200160834
stalin's fault for stopping at berlin to win the war only for everyone else to take the credit
>>
>>200161047
This is still bitter sweet ending because soviet union collapsed and almost all occupied lands are now back in core europe.
>>
>>200161129
almost all occupied lands are still being occupied, but it's by westoids so it's ok apparently
>>
>>200160834
norway?
>>
>>200161582
Im so tired of this meme, they are independent nations now, ask baltics do they feel being occupied by west. During soviet times they even had goverment in exile.
>>
File: emirusmile.jpg (132 KB, 960x720)
132 KB
132 KB JPG
>>200160834
>Yaý! Derrotamos a Hitler!
>No es así...
>>
>>200161582
If you ally with east, your country will have russian troops
If you ally with west, your country will have american troops
If you ally with no one, your country will have russian troops
>>
>>200161637
ask hungary and ukraine how sovreignty is going
>>200161705
i'd rather side with the chinks than spend another day with nato murican occupation
>>
>>200161705
nuh uh, eso no nos pasó, aprender a luchar
>>
>>200161777
???
>>
>>200161705
kek
>>
>>200161622
You rang. You realize Norway was a NATO founder unlike turkey and greece which joined later
>>
>>200160834
cold war didn't exist. it was not a war, but time of peace. the time of normal competition between countries
>>
>>200162087
Sweden would had joined too but since finland wasnt allowed, sweden stayed out because there wouldnt been any credibility after that for finnish "neutrality".
>>
>>200162087
>Norway was a NATO founder
not something to be proud of
>>
>>200162216
Can you explain your geo politics, why you prefer east over west?
>>
>>200162087
oh I mixed you with sweden sorry
>>
>>200162246
he’s a brownoid, or worse, a Russian
>>
>>200162246
eastern europe isn't good, it didn't really have much of a chance
i think any country with vassal states is bad, and right now the west is vassalizing half the planet
putin bad too
>>
>>200160834
we are peripherial countries, this region was never that important and its foolish to expect otherwise
>>
>>200161937
You still got russian troops in karelia, worst of all, those will never leave
>>
>>200162397
Eastern europe is now much richer than russia and they are catching up southern europe...
>>
>>200161582
people who got captured by americans during the war returned with a bag of candies, people who got captured by russian troops ended up being tortured, its a clear choice

the problem with americans is that they are ignorant at shit, they have advantages no one else has, the locations, waters, rivers, soil, natural resources, etc
their society is fairly dysfunctional, thats why americans suck at national building and their interventions fail everywhere
but its still a much better choice than russia
>>
>>200162847
not pro-russia
what if imperialism bad when both sides do it? does that make me a centrist?
>>
>>200162929
if both sides do it anyway then you choose the side that benefits you more its easy
>>
>>200163062
this is bold coming from a country that swapped a dictatorship for another
>>
>>200162847
How did russians torture people ? Did they cut their ears or something ?
>>
>>200163136
look i dont care about any of these buzzwords, muh imperialism, muh dictatorship, it means nothing to me
>>
>>200163196
wrong board then buddy
>>
>>200163241
wrong site bunker tranny
>>
when the cold war thread is about geopolitics
>>
> giving

The russians lost a lot of lives expelling the nazis from eastern europe. They could of just expell them from USSR and make a peace deal to avoid millons of further deaths.


Also, it wasnt a gift, the conditions were that the USSR would stop supporting proletariat revolutions abroad (thus the closing up of the comintern)

In retrospective, the leadership of the USSR changed world revolution for a few backward countries in eastern europe who would eventually become the most ardent and reactionary supporters of NATO and american hegemony
>>
>>200161093
You should have did it baka



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.