[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 25g0zz33o2z61.png (257 KB, 1716x810)
257 KB
257 KB PNG
How genetically homogenous is your country?
>>
>>200184939
The world shall be light yellow
>>
>>200184939
Idk
>>
>>200184939
>inbred areas contain cradles of civilization while the most genetically diverse area are oogabooga tier
I have always found my female cousins attractive and fap to them
>>
>>200184939
Blue areas should be nuked for general chuddery
>>
>>200185028
sort of
>>
>>200185028
It's because Sub-Saharan Africa for the longest time consisted of small inbred tribes while Europe and Asia already consisted of larger mixed nation states.
>>
File: pygmy.jpg (76 KB, 640x480)
76 KB
76 KB JPG
>>200184939
africa has shortest and tallest people
>>
File: dinka.jpg (263 KB, 962x590)
263 KB
263 KB JPG
tallest people
>>
>>200184939
since humans first arrived in Peru some 20-15k years ago there hasn't been a genetic displacement on the scale of the one that is happening right now with triracial venezuelans (3 million in a country of 30 million) so this isn't gonna remain true for long
>>
>>200185313
>Sub-Saharan Africa for the longest time consisted of small inbred tribes
Hasn't been for ages. You think everyone stayed in one place?
>>
>>200186011
Doesn't matter. There's still more genetic diversity in sub saharan Africa than on all the other continents combined. And greater genetic variation exists within the populations typically labeled black and white than between these populations. That's why the idea of a black race falls apart.

African populations such as the Khoe-San and the Pygmies spent tens of thousands of years separated from one another even before humans left Africa.
>>
>>200184939
We're very diverse. It's just that our race is based off of racemixing.

You can see mexicans with african traits and whote features in the same room sometimes
>>
>>200185573
Well, biggest difference of height between populations. Not sure if Masais are taller than dutches,
>>
>>200186163
Caucasus folk are taller then both. They fill out their frame better too.
>>
>>200186159
some mexicans even look like manny pacquiao
>>
>>200186061
Ethnicity is more accurate than race in medicine. Genetic predisposition is usually along the lines of ethnicity and geographic location. There are Papuans who look like any black person but they don’t have the same risk of sarcoidosis as someone with actual African ancestry.
>>
File: Cradles2.jpg (170 KB, 1140x760)
170 KB
170 KB JPG
>>200185313
Sub Saharan Africa isn't a cradle of civilization
>>
>>200186551
The idea of race has always been constructed as a sociocultural phenomenon. Benjamin Franklin considered the French, Germans, Russians, and Swedes among the swarthy. The only whites to his mind were the English and the Saxons. The Irish weren't considered white until the late 1800s in America. Italians in America weren't considered white until the early 20th century.

In colonial Hispanic America, it was possible for a person, regardless of phenotype (physical appearance), to become “white” by purchasing a royal certificate of “whiteness.” Some prospering individuals of African or Indian (feather not red dot) descent in colonial Spanish-America bought these certificates to be considered white.
>>
File: 288.jpg (71 KB, 995x1134)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
>>200186736
>In colonial Hispanic America, it was possible for a person, regardless of phenotype (physical appearance), to become “white” by purchasing a royal certificate of “whiteness.” Some prospering individuals of African or Indian (feather not red dot) descent in colonial Spanish-America bought these certificates to be considered white.
>>
>>200186797
Yeah, categories are fluid and/or based of arbitrary logic.
>>
File: 519057235.jpg (36 KB, 398x600)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>200186797
It's true and well documented by historians. It was an institutionalized the purchase of whiteness through a process called the "gracias al sacar. "
>>
>>200186905
>gracias al saar
lmao
>>
>>200186905
>It's true and well documented by historians
Sounds like you just learned what the Spanish Caste system was. That's not the same as what you're saying you dumb fuck.
>>
>>200186948
It's exactly what I'm saying. People were able to buy certificate of whiteness in colonial hispanic America, even if their phenotype was dark like a Haitian.
>>
File: 1685835499520142.gif (3.33 MB, 640x400)
3.33 MB
3.33 MB GIF
>>200186985
>People were able to buy certificate of whiteness in colonial hispanic
>>
>>200186985
And in the last Spanish census of Cuba, Mexican Indians and Chinese were classified as “white”, but in 1907 the first United States census there classed these groups as “colored.”
>>
>>200187033
Or In 1890, a Portuguese emigrant settling in Guyana (British Guiana) would learn that he/she was not “white.” But a sibling of that same person arriving in the United States in that same year would learn that by a sea-change he/she had become “white.” The idea of being "white" changes from nation to nation.
>>
File: 178554464.png (129 KB, 304x297)
129 KB
129 KB PNG
>>200185656
>tfw



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.