do you believe in the pope in your country?
>>203789123Depends, what did he say?
>>203789123Fictitious catholoid nonsense to justify having a pedo enclave in the heart of rome, no one has actually seen the pope in person for real
>>203789123No I'm convinced he's AI generated
>>203789123fuck this russian shill
Yes, I do. :)
I'm a tradcath sedevacantist and no I don't.
He's a leftist so I don't. I'm thinking of converting to Evangelical Christianism which is more wholesome since it doesn't attack capitalism and conservative values.
>>203789123I'm seriously convinced about his existence.I really am.Just a few doubts at certain times.
>>203789123I do, he's a Vicar of Christ and of the one true Faith :)
>>203789123Yes, as in I do believe there is someone called the pope and no because it's based on scriptural teachings.some nuance:"Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them." - Acts 20:30"Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;4Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.5Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?6And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.7For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.8And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming" - 2 Thessalonians 2:3-8
>>203793111It's not* based on scriptural teachings
nokatta hitori wa eiyu to natta
When will they get a black or mestizo pope? They will need to eventually. Current guy is from Argentina but he's of pure Italian ancestry so he doesn't count.
>>203789123Yes. Most people online who disagrees with him are dumb tradlarpers
>>203793266>When will they get a blackCardinal Sarah has been a solid contender for a while now but he's far too based for the modern Church.
>>203789123As an orthodox, I believe that the patriarch of Rome is merely an equal among his peers
>>203789123President Nelson gives us qt blondes from Utah. What does the pope give us?
the vatican got btfo'd by biology
>>203794511>What does the pope give us?A better eucharist
>>203789123Yep
>>203789123He exists also Catholicism is devil worship along Protestanism,Orthodox,and whatever kind of Christianity they came up with in America.True Followers of Jesus christ reject the system
>>203789123This fag lover hippie pedophile sold off his fellow priests to the dictatorship and then made bank with all of our corrupt governments lmao
THEN MAY THE CHRISTIAN LORD GUIDE MY HAND AGAINST YOUR ROMAN POPERY.
>>203789123fake pope
>>203789123Bergoglio proposed 6 African popes and 3 latinx He's dying so maybe we will get those
>>203789123https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_church_of_the_Roman_Empire>On the contrary, "in the East Roman or Byzantine view, when the Roman Empire became Christian, the perfect world order willed by God had been achieved: one universal empire was sovereign, and coterminous with it was the one universal church";[18] and the church came, by the time of the demise of the Byzantine Empire in 1453, to merge psychologically with it to the extent that its bishops had difficulty in thinking of Nicene Christianity without an emperor.[b][21]Also >The obliteration of the empire's boundaries by Germanic peoples and an outburst of missionary activity among these peoples, who had no direct links with the empire, and among Pictic and Celtic peoples who had never been part of the Roman Empire, fostered the idea of a universal church free from association with a particular stateSo what happened to 'real' Catholicism? Seems like that ultramontane spook in the 17th century was actually a callback.
>>203789123Not a fan, we haven't had a based pope in decades.
