This could be useful in Ukraine war, or its performances look similar to the turtle tanks?
>>61974051Why not just trebuchet dead Russian corpses into their water supply like we did with dead bodies in war when raiding castles?
>>61974051>This could be useful in Ukraine warWhat makes you think that? It is worse than a tank in every way, except its ability to push dirt, which doesn't seem very useful.
>>61974051It's worthless.>Slow>Big>No real gun (pistol ports don't count)>At best only as armored as any of the vast array of lightly armored vehicles already availableKilldozer-schizo, just admit your obsession is dumb and stupid already.
>>61974051Something like this could genuinely be useful as a mine clearing vehicle.
>>61974087If it worked they would had done it. Ukrainian industry might almost non-existent, but they do have the ability to weld some dozer blades to a tank.
>>61974072>bury vatniks alive in the trenches>not useful
>>61974170A tank with a blade can do that much faster than a bulldozer can. Not to mention it's better armored.
>>61974051No, they would blow the treads and set it on fire.
The killdozer is always gonna be cool as fuck but the forward and drive sprockets were the weak part of the design, had someone on site known this, it could have been disabled sooner.
>>61974051>Killdozer>Didn't kill anyonepottery
>>61974062it's a defensive war. the ukrainians would essentially be tossing corpses into their own water.
>>61974051It would be great for burying vatnigs alive but it would never make it across no-mans-land with the amount of AT getting around the front.
>>61974106We've done it before like in Iraq, it's just the ground is so fucking muddy and upturned that it's useless. Not to mention the fact it'd be hit by a missile almost immediately.
>>61975001>Ukraine rigs up Soviet-era light transport aircraft into drones capable of depositing pre-slurried mobik cubes into open reservoirs up to 300km within Russian territory
