Was it really that bad of a plane?
>>61975781It was good for the 1936 to 1938 period. But they should have been replaced by 1940.
>>61975781These threads suck dick, OPPut at least a LITTLE effort in
>>61975781Bad design, useless torpedoes. The B5N, B5M were far better.
>>61975781Diamondhead and prewar torp squadrons are the most aesthetic framing possible but I wonder why you are continuing to push this trend without just making a old school naval aviation general or something.
>>61975781no for when it was introduced, yes for when it saw combat
>>61975811>a plane that first flew in 1937 is more advanced than a plane that first flew in 1935you're telling me this for the first time
