In terms of pure aesthetics,PL-01 mogs.
>>62087580Nah.
>>62087628I wonder who's behind this post?
>>62087580cybertruck of tanks
>>62087646The warrior sucks balls I just think the challenger looks neat.
>>62087580>>62087628>>62087667
>>62087679Fat fuck
>>62087679Challenger 3 looks sexy from front viewbut a little mid from side view
>>62087580It's pretty neat I'll give you that, but I honest to god think that just about every tank that has been made in the last 50 isn't a Leopard or Leclerc fucking thrashes it in the looks department.
>>62087693Fuck you bloody it's absolute Cinema from side view
>>62087691If you knew the nightmarish horrors involved in British military procurement and budgeting you'd comfort eat too.
>>62087580Abrams MerkavaLeopard II.Those are the holy trinity of tank aesthetic and I WILL fight a motherfucker IRL if they disagree.
>>62087580about as functional as the T-14
>>62087935>doesn't know Russian mindset Ooooooooooof
>>62087580Give it some atgm's, better/more aps (that can target drones) and order 2000 instead of K-2.
>>62087926>Merkava>aestheticBait used to be believable
>>62087935>about as functional as the T-14as absurd as it may sound it's probably more functional than the T-14 since the mockup was basically a Swedish light tank with a bodykit
Its design is unironically too good - it got normies hyped while it's actually just a CV90 body kit.It's been over a decade but you can still see fresh comments written by retards convinced that we had super high tech tank ready for production but German/US MIC/leftie conspiracy killed the project.t. Pole
>>62087580Why the giant sheath on the barrel? It looks silly
>>62087580This looks like it belongs in a Flash game.
>>62087580Only if it was hovering
