[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


is 10mm better than 45 acp?
>>
i bet they LOVE to discuss 90 day fiancee
>>
>>62523265
10mm is better at being metric
45 is better at being created by John Moses Browning and winning two world wars
fucking nerd
>>
File: 1711929729534705.png (569 KB, 1280x720)
569 KB
569 KB PNG
>>
>>62523265
I'm getting more .380 vs .45 vibes from your pic. Would both
>>
>>62523265
Right is overall hotter, left has sexier feet, but both are built for BBC.
/thread.
>>
>is 10mm better than 45 acp?
what makes a handgun cartridge good or bad?
>>
>smiling-thru-the-envy

1. The BigTitsSmallTits and BreastEnvy boards would be instantly improved by an autojanny rule that only keeps new posts if they have a title like

>[breastenvy]
>[bigtitssmalltits]

with nothing else in them.
99% of the titles are heinous cringe.
The cringe multiplies, like a virus, via superspreader OPs like OP.

2. A real one would've used a pic from samespecies. Or at least would have taken 1 second to auto-brighten that dingy-ass shitpic.
>>
>>62523265
cant we all just... get along?
>>
File: simple.jpg (126 KB, 800x600)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
>>
>>62523300
Gokubro btw
>>
File: 1726157811534.webm (1.72 MB, 576x1024)
1.72 MB
1.72 MB WEBM
>>62523477
>samespecies
Banned
>>
File: 1726159365586.webm (2.97 MB, 576x1024)
2.97 MB
2.97 MB WEBM
>>
>>62523265
the one on the left takes less effort to deep dick
>>
>>62523295
I know right? Thank God.
>>
File: 1725756979492.webm (2.12 MB, 1080x1452)
2.12 MB
2.12 MB WEBM
>>
I hate women so much it’s unreal
>>
>>62523708
Not my problem.
>>
>>62523719
More than a handful is literally a waste and should be spanked for being wasteful. Alot.
>>
File: 9mm_kid.png (1.16 MB, 1053x2048)
1.16 MB
1.16 MB PNG
>>62523265
10mm is better on paper, but that's only if you're counting standard 45 ACP. When you go up to 45 Super or 460 Rowland, you can equal 10mm or even surpass it. The caveat aside from reduced capacity is that 460 requires a compensator to operate. 10mm with a compensator is much more tame.
>>
>>62523265
a footfag's dream, christ
>>
>>62523886
Whats so particular about them feet?
>>
>>62523679
>>62523690
>>62523719
You failed them
>>
>>62523265
Stock for stock, 10mm>45acp. However 45 Super is better than 10mm.
>>
Erm… they’re over 18 right?
>>
>>62523265
>10mm has more energy/velocity
>Not enough to make holes bigger than projectile sized
>These higher velocity loads typically aren't very reliable, people who claim they are have usually only fired dozens of rounds to make the claim
>Higher velocity loads almost always use projectiles intended for .40 s&w velocities, many times resulting in over expansion or even bullet failure and lower penetration
Over the years I've come to the conclusion that .45 is legitimately better than 10mm if you believe in the meme of maximizing handgun per shot performance. Plus .45 super is a thing if you want more FPE for whatever reason.
>>
>>62523796
>only if you're counting standard 45 ACP.
>When you go up to 45 Super or 460 Rowland
45 Super and 460 Roland aren't 45 ACP Anon. 460 was intentionally designed so you couldn't load it in 45 ACP guns. 45 Super can be, but that's a bad idea in guns not rated for it and its not the same brass anyways.
>>
>>62523740
based homo
>>
>>62525499
>45 super
>.460 rowland
>9x25 dillon
10mm sisters...i dont feel so good...
>>
>185 grain 45acp
>1100fps

>180 grain 10mm
>1200fps

What's the fucking point of 10mm?
>>
File: 1656906994055.jpg (174 KB, 730x853)
174 KB
174 KB JPG
>>
>>62527007
357 mag chads where we at?
>>
>>62525157
why is there always a faggot like this? if it makes your dick hard, she's clearly old enough
>>
>>62527097
I regret going 357 Mag over 45colt. But 357 Mag is the best all around cartridge for the US.
>>
>>62525730
You can use the same brass but you need a fully supported chamber
>>
>>62523265
>ND provoking image
>irrelevant ammo wasting question
>>
>>62528128
kek
>>
>>62523265
Both are hot
>>
I prefer 9mm for price and being able to be used in a variety of guns but there is something very satisfying about shooing a fat 230 grain ball round of .45 out of a USP or 1911
>>
>>62523300
Go away wimp
>>
File: 1725769021453951.jpg (168 KB, 1125x1126)
168 KB
168 KB JPG
>>62523265
BRVTAL
>>
>>62523265
>45 SUPER laughs
>>
>>62523265

Better question is why is Ruger not making this in 9mm, and why the fuck does the 45 version not have a 30 rounder like the 10mm
>>
It's a pistol, don't over think it.
>>
File: 1713812354459653.jpg (240 KB, 1000x1500)
240 KB
240 KB JPG
>>62527007
>.440 Cor-bon
>>
File: 1715390449412877.jpg (414 KB, 800x533)
414 KB
414 KB JPG
>>62527097
>>
>>62523679
first time I've been more attracted to "the uglier one" in one of these
>>
Is 45 Super really more effective than 10mm? Would the doublestack RIA 1911 work well with it?
>>
>>62528845
They need to make an 8” pistol version since 10mm shines in barrel lengths less than 10” where it has more muzzle energy than 223.
>>62529515
Depends on the weight and velocity of the projectile of course. You could probably get it to run 45 Super without wearing out the gun if you install heavier recoil springs. I’d be careful though. Do your research so you won’t end up cracking the slide if your 1911.
>>
>>62523719
Any info of the one on the right?
>>
File: weak doge.png (69 KB, 250x249)
69 KB
69 KB PNG
>>62528918
>.429de
>>
>>62529515
It can send a heavier bullet around the same speeds as a 10mm, though the hottest loads of 10mm can bridge the gap .460 rowland also exists which blows both out of the water
>>
>>62529670
I have been here almost two decades and did not know that was a thing.
Or I did but only learned about it while piss drunk and forgot.
Either way; Thanks, anon.
>>
>>62529656
Yeah, she's a slut.
>>
>>62523796
If your gonna do that then why not consider 10mm magnum?
>>
>>62526548
Oh come the fuck on. If your gonna compare underwood’s +p 185 grain 45 acp then at least compare it to hot 10mm… for example underwood has 200 gn 10mm at 1250 fps. Or a buffalo bore has a 220 gn hardcast at 1200 fps.
>>
>>62523265
>is 10mm better than 45 acp
No.

10mm is a hunting cartridge for handloaders.
Handguns chambered for it require barrel lengthd of 5 inches or greater to be worthwhile.

.45 ACP and .40 S&W are human-combat self defense cartridges.

the webms and pics are plebbit tier
>>
>>62523265
yes, if you reload, because most commercial 10mm offerings are just .40sw seconds which are sold to ignorant buyers
so in practicality, it's not
>>
>>62525730
.45 super is basically identical to .45acp, only reason it's named so is because it's SUPER hot ammo and will explode most fudd's crapola guns, which is why they had to denote it as such
>>
>>62530538
10mm is ineffective against people? Or ineffective in a 4 inch bbl?
I agree, if you go full centi go full 5" or even longer but it is still a more effective man stopper out of same length bbl.
>>
>>62523762
no, you want just over a handful.
>>
>>62530637
>>62530637
This.
Buffalo Bore or Underwood. Most 10mm is shit because of Colt's issues back in the day and them pressuring domestic ammo manufacturers.
>>
>>62523762
>Not long enough to tit fuck and still make her gag.
I don't hate you. You didn't choose it unless you are fat as fuck and had control over your diet as a child. I am grateful for mine.
But don't shit on something you cannot have.
>>
>>62530657
>ineffective
Didi I use that word in my post?
(tl/dr : No, it was (You) who introduced that notion and word.)

is .505 Gibbs "ineffective" against people?
how about .338 Win Mag? .460 Rowland?
>>
>>62530538
>10mm is a hunting cartridge
It was designed by Jeff Cooper to hunt jiggaboos specifically.
>>
>>62530648
>only reason it's named so is because it's SUPER hot ammo
It is super hot but it gets its name because its 45acp thats supersonic. Which makes it very similar to 10mm. They run similar weight bullets.
>>
>>62530509
So hot vs hot is only 100fps difference? Still don't see the point.
>>
>>62530667
Blazer brass 180 grain 10mm is going 1200fps. That's as hot as 10mm gets. Underwood might get 50fps more at best. I can't believe people still parrot this bull shit today.
>>
File: Heavy10mm.jpg (75 KB, 924x511)
75 KB
75 KB JPG
>>62532451
>That's as hot as 10mm gets
>180 grain 10mm is going 1200fps.
Anon....
>>
File: 1613350572495.jpg (82 KB, 490x427)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>62532451
>That's as hot as 10mm gets
>>
>>62532479
That will pull 1300 on a chrono at best with a 5 inch barrel. BB have been busted lying many times over the years and even kb.
>>
>>62533042
>baseless claims
>moving the goalposts
>still more than 1200fps
Just take the L
>>
File: underwood.jpg (100 KB, 1170x736)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
>>62532451
LMAO
>>
>>62533061
Baseless claims? Your source is buffalo bore. Keep buying it like the chump you are. Blazer brass is delivering the same performance.
>>
>>62533099
Yes baseless. Show me where they've been caught lying about performance.
>Blazer brass is delivering the same performance
What about Underwood. Are they lying too? What about Sig elite V-crown? That's 1250fps. Or Hornady XTP? That's 1275. I find it hard to believe everyone is lying. You're just full of shit and a massive faggot.
>>
>>62533042
Ballistics By the Inch got 1375 fps out of a Colt Delta Elite with a 5" barrel, 1399 fps out of a Contender with a 5" barrel.
http://ballisticsbytheinch.com/10mm.html
>>
>>62532427
With a 15 or 35 gn difference in the round.
>>
>>62533342
So not only are they wrong about buffalo bore lying but they actually exceed their claimed performance.
>>
>>62533474
Ballistics by the inch is all made up bull shit. What's with all these newfags that believe everything they read and never used a chrono before? I bet you use jhp too lmao
>>
>>62533552
>used a Chrono before
Like this guy, who measured an average of 1314fps out of a Glock with a 4.6" barrel?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHWzjFUCaZE
>>
>>62533609
They're clearly a troll bud.
>>
File: 1911.jpg (80 KB, 720x371)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
I bought a doublestack 10mm. My end goal is a 7" barrel, cobra skin grips, and some sort of inscription. I may have to get a 45 and akimbo.
>>
>>62523265
I'm more of a fan of .22 short if you know what I mean.
>>
>>62532351
I shoot 250g at 1070 fps 45 supers. I have some 260g but I haven't tried to load those yet
>>
>>62535414
Well sure you can do really heavy loads like that but the original point and the logic behind the name was pushing 45 to supersonic.
>>
>>62533694
You're embarrassing yourself.
>>
>>62524078
The ones on the left are pretty much perfect.
>>62533740
That's a lot more than 7", bro



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.